These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32416329)

  • 1. Implicit attentional biases in a changing environment.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 May; 206():103064. PubMed ID: 32416329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical regularities bias overt attention.
    Wang B; Samara I; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1813-1821. PubMed ID: 30919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical regularities across trials bias attentional selection.
    Li AS; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Aug; 46(8):860-870. PubMed ID: 32324032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention.
    Gao Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3895-3906. PubMed ID: 32909086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial enhancement due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.
    Zhang Y; Yang Y; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1077-1086. PubMed ID: 35426029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):860-870. PubMed ID: 29476331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical learning in the absence of explicit top-down attention.
    Duncan D; Theeuwes J
    Cortex; 2020 Oct; 131():54-65. PubMed ID: 32801075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feature intertrial priming biases attentional priority: Evidence from the capture-probe paradigm.
    Wirth BE; Ramgir A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1145-1157. PubMed ID: 37338430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation.
    Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Counter-regulation in affective attentional biases: Evidence in the additional singleton paradigm.
    Wentura D; Müller P; Rothermund K; Voss A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1209-1218. PubMed ID: 28376664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impaired selection of a previously ignored singleton: Evidence for salience map plastic changes.
    Turatto M; Valsecchi M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jun; 75(6):1114-1120. PubMed ID: 34498985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of individual differences in distractor suppression driven by statistical learning.
    Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J; Bogaerts L
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2437-2451. PubMed ID: 37491558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial suppression due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.
    Lin R; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33078381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trial-to-trial carryover effects on spatial attentional bias.
    Gladwin TE; Figner B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():51-55. PubMed ID: 30986566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The persistence of the attentional bias to regularities in a changing environment.
    Yu RQ; Zhao J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2217-28. PubMed ID: 26037211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relevance drives attention: Attentional bias for gain- and loss-related stimuli is driven by delayed disengagement.
    Müller S; Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(4):752-63. PubMed ID: 25980956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention is spontaneously biased toward regularities.
    Zhao J; Al-Aidroos N; Turk-Browne NB
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):667-77. PubMed ID: 23558552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proactive enhancement and suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Donk M; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 May; 48(5):443-457. PubMed ID: 35324244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.