These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32416329)

  • 21. Attentional bias during emotional processing: evidence from an emotional flanker task using IAPS.
    Parra MA; Sánchez MG; Valencia S; Trujillo N
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):275-285. PubMed ID: 28288533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Brief time course of trait anxiety-related attentional bias to fear-conditioned stimuli: Evidence from the dual-RSVP task.
    Booth RW
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Mar; 54():71-76. PubMed ID: 27393891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preferential attentional engagement drives attentional bias to snakes in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Masataka N; Koda H; Atsumi T; Satoh M; Lipp OV
    Sci Rep; 2018 Dec; 8(1):17773. PubMed ID: 30538271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electrophysiological evidence of an attentional bias in crossmodal inhibition of return.
    Pierce AM; McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jun; 114():11-18. PubMed ID: 29630915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities.
    Damsma A; Taatgen N; de Jong R; van Rijn H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1136-1149. PubMed ID: 31485992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial selective attention biases are shaped by long-term musical experience and short-term exposure to tones.
    Cruse A; Offen K; Markant J
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Aug; 125():106-117. PubMed ID: 29990700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attentional suppression is in place before display onset.
    Huang C; Donk M; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 37024729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention II: Evidence from within-domain additivity.
    Ogden A; Kim H; Anderson BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 36536205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Proactively location-based suppression elicited by statistical learning.
    Kong S; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0233544. PubMed ID: 32479531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Learned prioritization yields attentional biases through selection history.
    Munneke J; E Corbett J; van der Burg E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2244-2256. PubMed ID: 31974938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attentional bias towards angry faces is moderated by the activation of a social processing mode in the general population.
    Wirth BE; Wentura D
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Nov; 33(7):1317-1329. PubMed ID: 30587095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation.
    Ferrante O; Chelazzi L; Santandrea E
    Cortex; 2023 Dec; 169():95-117. PubMed ID: 37866062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Beer? Over here! Examining attentional bias towards alcoholic and appetitive stimuli in a visual search eye-tracking task.
    Pennington CR; Qureshi AW; Monk RL; Greenwood K; Heim D
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Dec; 236(12):3465-3476. PubMed ID: 31286155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attentional bias to threat in the general population is contingent on target competition, not on attentional control settings.
    Wirth BE; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):975-988. PubMed ID: 28303742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Flexible weighting of target features based on distractor context.
    Lee J; Geng JJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):739-751. PubMed ID: 31741317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatiotemporal brain dynamics underlying attentional bias modifications.
    Sallard E; Hartmann L; Ptak R; Spierer L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Aug; 130():29-39. PubMed ID: 29883677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Investigating the role of exogenous cueing on selection history formation.
    Grubb MA; Christensen G; Albanese J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1282-1288. PubMed ID: 30924059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Which search are you on? Adapting to color while searching for shape.
    Bergmann N; Tünnermann J; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):457-477. PubMed ID: 31741316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.