212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32417337)
21. Cost-effectiveness of functional cardiac testing in the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease: a randomised controlled trial. The CECaT trial.
Sharples L; Hughes V; Crean A; Dyer M; Buxton M; Goldsmith K; Stone D
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Dec; 11(49):iii-iv, ix-115. PubMed ID: 18021576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Global Coronary Flow Reserve Measured During Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is an Independent Predictor of Adverse Cardiovascular Events.
Indorkar R; Kwong RY; Romano S; White BE; Chia RC; Trybula M; Evans K; Shenoy C; Farzaneh-Far A
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Aug; 12(8 Pt 2):1686-1695. PubMed ID: 30409558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sixty-four-slice computed tomography of the coronary arteries: cost-effectiveness analysis of patients presenting to the emergency department with low-risk chest pain.
Khare RK; Courtney DM; Powell ES; Venkatesh AK; Lee TA
Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Jul; 15(7):623-32. PubMed ID: 19086322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-effectiveness of substituting dual-energy CT for SPECT in the assessment of myocardial perfusion for the workup of coronary artery disease.
Meyer M; Nance JW; Schoepf UJ; Moscariello A; Weininger M; Rowe GW; Ruzsics B; Kang DK; Chiaramida SA; Schoenberg SO; Fink C; Henzler T
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3719-25. PubMed ID: 21277132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evidence-based cardiovascular magnetic resonance cost-effectiveness calculator for the detection of significant coronary artery disease.
Pandya A; Yu YJ; Ge Y; Nagel E; Kwong RY; Bakar RA; Grizzard JD; Merkler AE; Ntusi N; Petersen SE; Rashedi N; Schwitter J; Selvanayagam JB; White JA; Carr J; Raman SV; Simonetti OP; Bucciarelli-Ducci C; Sierra-Galan LM; Ferrari VA; Bhatia M; Kelle S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2022 Jan; 24(1):1. PubMed ID: 34986851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in emergency patients with multivessel disease or unobstructed coronary arteries: a cost-effectiveness analysis in the UK.
Stokes EA; Doble B; Pufulete M; Reeves BC; Bucciarelli-Ducci C; Dorman S; Greenwood JP; Anderson RA; Wordsworth S
BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e025700. PubMed ID: 31300495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Combined Assessment of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Flow Measurement in the Coronary Sinus Improves Prediction of Functionally Significant Coronary Stenosis Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve in Multivessel Disease.
Nakamori S; Sakuma H; Dohi K; Ishida M; Tanigawa T; Yamada A; Takase S; Nakajima H; Sawai T; Masuda J; Nagata M; Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Fujii E; Yamada N; Ito M
J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Jan; 7(3):. PubMed ID: 29432130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve.
Manka R; Wissmann L; Gebker R; Jogiya R; Motwani M; Frick M; Reinartz S; Schnackenburg B; Niemann M; Gotschy A; Kuhl C; Nagel E; Fleck E; Marx N; Luescher TF; Plein S; Kozerke S
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25901043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost-effectiveness of stress CTP versus CTA in detecting obstructive CAD or in-stent restenosis in stented patients.
Kim SH; Rübenthaler J; Nörenberg D; Huber T; Kunz WG; Sommer WH; Schoenberg SO; Janssen S; Overhoff D; Froelich MF
Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1443-1450. PubMed ID: 32885295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Stress Perfusion Coronary Flow Reserve Versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Known or Suspected CAD.
Kato S; Saito N; Nakachi T; Fukui K; Iwasawa T; Taguri M; Kosuge M; Kimura K
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Aug; 70(7):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease.
Bettencourt N; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Ferreira N; Sampaio F; Pires-Morais G; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Azevedo L; Teixeira M; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 61(10):1099-107. PubMed ID: 23375929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements.
Ebersberger U; Makowski MR; Schoepf UJ; Platz U; Schmidtler F; Rose J; Kessel A; Roth P; Antoni D; Schnackenburg B; Helmberger T; Rieber J; Hoffmann E; Leber AW
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1174-80. PubMed ID: 23907345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of patients with chest pain.
Ladapo JA; Jaffer FA; Hoffmann U; Thomson CC; Bamberg F; Dec W; Cutler DM; Weinstein MC; Gazelle GS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 54(25):2409-22. PubMed ID: 20082932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cost evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus coronary angiography for the diagnostic work-up of coronary artery disease: application of the European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance registry data to the German, United Kingdom, Swiss, and United States health care systems.
Moschetti K; Muzzarelli S; Pinget C; Wagner A; Pilz G; Wasserfallen JB; Schulz-Menger J; Nothnagel D; Dill T; Frank H; Lombardi M; Bruder O; Mahrholdt H; Schwitter J
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jun; 14(1):35. PubMed ID: 22697303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Stress-Only Adenosine CMR Improves Diagnostic Yield in Stable Symptomatic Patients With Coronary Artery Calcium.
Rijlaarsdam-Hermsen D; Lo-Kioeng-Shioe M; van Domburg RT; Deckers JW; Kuijpers D; van Dijkman PRM
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 May; 13(5):1152-1160. PubMed ID: 31954641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Optimal imaging strategies to assess coronary blood flow and risk for patients with coronary artery disease.
Jerosch-Herold M; Kwong RY
Curr Opin Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 23(6):599-606. PubMed ID: 18830076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Combined single-session cardiovascular magnetic resonance: stress perfusion and three-dimensional pulmonary vein angiography for stratification of atrial fibrillation patients with chest pain syndromes prior to catheter ablation.
Oebel S; Paetsch I; Stegmann C; Kircher S; Sommer P; Arya A; Lindemann F; Bollmann A; Hindricks G; Jahnke C
Europace; 2019 Dec; 21(12):1809-1816. PubMed ID: 31513245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic performance of non-invasive imaging for stable coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis.
Pontone G; Guaricci AI; Palmer SC; Andreini D; Verdecchia M; Fusini L; Lorenzoni V; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Baggiano A; Rabbat MG; Cademartiri F; Strippoli GF
Int J Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 300():276-281. PubMed ID: 31748186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnosing coronary artery disease after a positive coronary computed tomography angiography: the Dan-NICAD open label, parallel, head to head, randomized controlled diagnostic accuracy trial of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
Nissen L; Winther S; Westra J; Ejlersen JA; Isaksen C; Rossi A; Holm NR; Urbonaviciene G; Gormsen LC; Madsen LH; Christiansen EH; Maeng M; Knudsen LL; Frost L; Brix L; Bøtker HE; Petersen SE; Bøttcher M
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 19(4):369-377. PubMed ID: 29447342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
