These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32417500)

  • 1. The necessity and risk factors of subsequent fusion after decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5 years follow-up in two different large populations.
    Urakawa H; Jones T; Samuel A; Vaishnav AS; Othman Y; Virk S; Katsuura Y; Iyer S; McAnany S; Albert T; Gang CH; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2020 Oct; 20(10):1566-1572. PubMed ID: 32417500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up.
    Salimi H; Toyoda H; Terai H; Yamada K; Hoshino M; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Hori Y; Yabu A; Nakamura H
    Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):819-826. PubMed ID: 34813957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system.
    Mohanty S; Barchick S; Kadiyala M; Lad M; Rouhi AD; Vadali C; Albayar A; Ozturk AK; Khalsa A; Saifi C; Casper DS
    Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 36064091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Försth P; Ólafsson G; Carlsson T; Frost A; Borgström F; Fritzell P; Öhagen P; Michaëlsson K; Sandén B
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1413-23. PubMed ID: 27074066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The outcome of decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Ahmad S; Hamad A; Bhalla A; Turner S; Balain B; Jaffray D
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):414-419. PubMed ID: 27272494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study.
    Kim CH; Chung CK; Park CS; Choi B; Hahn S; Kim MJ; Lee KS; Park BJ
    Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1230-7. PubMed ID: 24017959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decompression Surgery Alone Versus Decompression Plus Fusion in Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Swiss Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study With 3 Years of Follow-up.
    Ulrich NH; Burgstaller JM; Pichierri G; Wertli MM; Farshad M; Porchet F; Steurer J; Held U;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Sep; 42(18):E1077-E1086. PubMed ID: 28092340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.
    Schöller K; Alimi M; Cong GT; Christos P; Härtl R
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):355-367. PubMed ID: 28362963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bae HW; Rajaee SS; Kanim LE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):916-26. PubMed ID: 23324922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Ghogawala Z; Dziura J; Butler WE; Dai F; Terrin N; Magge SN; Coumans JV; Harrington JF; Amin-Hanjani S; Schwartz JS; Sonntag VK; Barker FG; Benzel EC
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1424-34. PubMed ID: 27074067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decompression alone versus decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gadjradj PS; Basilious M; Goldberg JL; Sommer F; Navarro-Ramirez R; Mykolajtchuk C; Ng AZ; Medary B; Hussain I; Härtl R
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Mar; 32(3):1054-1067. PubMed ID: 36609887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decompression alone vs. decompression plus fusion for claudication secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Thomas K; Faris P; McIntosh G; Manners S; Abraham E; Bailey CS; Paquet J; Cadotte D; Jacobs WB; Rampersaud YR; Manson NA; Hall H; Fisher CG
    Spine J; 2019 Oct; 19(10):1633-1639. PubMed ID: 31195133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decompression alone or with fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Nordsten-DS): five year follow-up of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.
    Kgomotso EL; Hellum C; Fagerland MW; Solberg T; Brox JI; Storheim K; Hermansen E; Franssen E; Weber C; Brisby H; Algaard KRH; Furunes H; Banitalebi H; Ljøstad I; Indrekvam K; Austevoll IM;
    BMJ; 2024 Aug; 386():e079771. PubMed ID: 39111800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does fusion improve the outcome after decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis?: A two-year follow-up study involving 5390 patients.
    Försth P; Michaëlsson K; Sandén B
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Jul; 95-B(7):960-5. PubMed ID: 23814250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distraction Laminoplasty With Interlaminar Lumbar Instrumented Fusion (ILIF) for Lumbar Stenosis With or Without Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis: Technique and 2-Year Outcomes.
    Cuéllar JM; Field JS; Bae HW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S97-S105. PubMed ID: 26839990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective versus multi-segmental decompression and fusion for multi-segment lumbar spinal stenosis with single-segment degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Sun W; Xue C; Tang XY; Feng H; Yuan F; Guo KJ; Zhao J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 30755227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbar spine surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA): what affects the outcomes?
    Seki S; Hirano N; Matsushita I; Kawaguchi Y; Nakano M; Yasuda T; Motomura H; Suzuki K; Yahara Y; Watanabe K; Makino H; Kimura T
    Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 28673829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of decompression, decompression plus fusion, and decompression plus stabilization: a long-term follow-up of a prospective, randomized study.
    Inose H; Kato T; Sasaki M; Matsukura Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Kawabata S; Hirakawa A; Okawa A
    Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):747-755. PubMed ID: 34963630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reoperation Rate After Microsurgical Uni- or Bilateral Laminotomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With and Without Low-grade Spondylolisthesis: What do Preoperative Radiographic Parameters Tell Us?
    Schär RT; Kiebach S; Raabe A; Ulrich CT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Feb; 44(4):E245-E251. PubMed ID: 30015718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of Decompression Alone in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.
    Ha DH; Kim TK; Oh SK; Cho HG; Kim KR; Shim DM
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2020 Jun; 12(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 32489540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.