164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32417603)
1. Comparison of effects of four interbody fusion approaches on the fused and adjacent segments under vibration.
Guo LX; Wang QD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jun; 76():105023. PubMed ID: 32417603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Finite Element Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of Fused Lumbar Spine.
Fan W; Guo LX; Zhao D
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jun; 150():e81-e88. PubMed ID: 33647495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of the effects of anterior, posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on vibration characteristics of the human lumbar spine.
Fan W; Guo LX
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Apr; 22(5):490-498. PubMed ID: 30714396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with various fixation options: Finite element analysis of static and vibration conditions.
Shen H; Chen Y; Liao Z; Liu W
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Apr; 84():105339. PubMed ID: 33780788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical role of osteoporosis in the vibration characteristics of human spine after lumbar interbody fusion.
Wang QD; Guo LX
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Dec; 36(12):e3402. PubMed ID: 33021071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of lordosis on adjacent levels after lumbar interbody fusion, before and after removal of the spinal fixator: a finite element analysis.
Tsuang FY; Tsai JC; Lai DM
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Oct; 20(1):470. PubMed ID: 31651312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Role of Posterior Screw Fixation in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion During Whole Body Vibration: A Finite Element Study.
Fan W; Guo LX
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e1086-e1093. PubMed ID: 29605701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of four surgical scenarios of lumbar fusion with hyperlordotic interbody cage: A finite element study.
Zhang Z; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Sun Y; Sun X; Liu W
Biomed Mater Eng; 2018; 29(4):485-497. PubMed ID: 30282345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical Evaluation of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Various Fixation Options for Adjacent Segment Degeneration: A Finite Element Analysis.
Lee HJ; Lee SJ; Jung JM; Lee TH; Jeong C; Lee TJ; Jang JE; Lee JW
World Neurosurg; 2023 May; 173():e156-e167. PubMed ID: 36775239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of dynamic response of three TLIF techniques on the fused and adjacent segments under vibration.
Wang QD; Guo LX
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Feb; 24(3):308-319. PubMed ID: 33047970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE
Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does Lumbar Interbody Fusion Modality Affect the Occurrence of Complications in an Osteoporotic Spine Under Whole-Body Vibration? A Finite Element Study.
Zeng Q; Liao Y; Pou K; Chen Q; Li Y; Cai L; Huang Z; Tang S
World Neurosurg; 2023 Aug; 176():e297-e305. PubMed ID: 37224957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical role of cement augmentation in the vibration characteristics of the osteoporotic lumbar spine after lumbar interbody fusion.
Wang QD; Guo LX
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2022 Jun; 33(6):52. PubMed ID: 35657438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of complications and fusion outcomes of fused lumbar spine with or without fixation system under whole-body vibration.
Wang QD; Guo LX
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Jun; 59(6):1223-1233. PubMed ID: 34080095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the influence of three different lumbar interbody fusion approaches on stress in the pedicle screw fixation system: Finite element static and vibration analyses.
Fan W; Guo LX
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 Mar; 35(3):e3162. PubMed ID: 30294902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The anterior and traverse cage can provide optimal biomechanical performance for both traditional and percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
He L; Xiang Q; Yang Y; Tsai TY; Yu Y; Cheng L
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Apr; 131():104291. PubMed ID: 33676337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stress analysis of the implants in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under static and vibration loadings: a comparison between pedicle screw fixation system with rigid and flexible rods.
Fan W; Guo LX; Zhao D
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2019 Oct; 30(10):118. PubMed ID: 31628540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems.
Fan W; Guo LX; Zhang M
Eur Spine J; 2021 Aug; 30(8):2342-2350. PubMed ID: 33948750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
