BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32418341)

  • 1. Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support in modern medical physics: Selection, acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance.
    Mahadevaiah G; Rv P; Bermejo I; Jaffray D; Dekker A; Wee L
    Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):e228-e235. PubMed ID: 32418341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical decision support systems at the Vienna General Hospital using Arden Syntax: Design, implementation, and integration.
    Schuh C; de Bruin JS; Seeling W
    Artif Intell Med; 2018 Nov; 92():24-33. PubMed ID: 26706047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Machine learning-based clinical decision support systems for pregnancy care: A systematic review.
    Du Y; McNestry C; Wei L; Antoniadi AM; McAuliffe FM; Mooney C
    Int J Med Inform; 2023 May; 173():105040. PubMed ID: 36907027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reasons For Physicians Not Adopting Clinical Decision Support Systems: Critical Analysis.
    Khairat S; Marc D; Crosby W; Al Sanousi A
    JMIR Med Inform; 2018 Apr; 6(2):e24. PubMed ID: 29669706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation.
    Liberati EG; Ruggiero F; Galuppo L; Gorli M; González-Lorenzo M; Maraldi M; Ruggieri P; Polo Friz H; Scaratti G; Kwag KH; Vespignani R; Moja L
    Implement Sci; 2017 Sep; 12(1):113. PubMed ID: 28915822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptance, Barriers, and Facilitators to Implementing Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support Systems in Emergency Departments: Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation.
    Fujimori R; Liu K; Soeno S; Naraba H; Ogura K; Hara K; Sonoo T; Ogura T; Nakamura K; Goto T
    JMIR Form Res; 2022 Jun; 6(6):e36501. PubMed ID: 35699995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Clinical Decision Support System for Sleep Staging Tasks With Explanations From Artificial Intelligence: User-Centered Design and Evaluation Study.
    Hwang J; Lee T; Lee H; Byun S
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e28659. PubMed ID: 35044311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adolescent, parent, and provider attitudes toward a machine learning based clinical decision support system for selecting treatment for youth depression.
    Gunlicks-Stoessel M; Liu Y; Parkhill C; Morrell N; Choy-Brown M; Mehus C; Hetler J; August G
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2024 Jan; 24(1):4. PubMed ID: 38167319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptance and use of a clinical decision support system in musculoskeletal pain disorders - the SupportPrim project.
    Granviken F; Meisingset I; Vasseljen O; Bach K; Bones AF; Klevanger NE
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Dec; 23(1):293. PubMed ID: 38114970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human Factors and Technological Characteristics Influencing the Interaction of Medical Professionals With Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Literature Review.
    Knop M; Weber S; Mueller M; Niehaves B
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2022 Mar; 9(1):e28639. PubMed ID: 35323118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpretability of Clinical Decision Support Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence from Technological and Medical Perspective: A Systematic Review.
    Xu Q; Xie W; Liao B; Hu C; Qin L; Yang Z; Xiong H; Lyu Y; Zhou Y; Luo A
    J Healthc Eng; 2023; 2023():9919269. PubMed ID: 36776958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of electronic clinical decision support systems: a qualitative interview study with UK general practitioners.
    Ford E; Edelman N; Somers L; Shrewsbury D; Lopez Levy M; van Marwijk H; Curcin V; Porat T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Jun; 21(1):193. PubMed ID: 34154580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A process model for quality in use evaluation of clinical decision support systems.
    Souza-Pereira L; Ouhbi S; Pombo N
    J Biomed Inform; 2021 Nov; 123():103917. PubMed ID: 34563692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and implementation of computerized clinical guidelines: barriers and solutions.
    Trivedi MH; Kern JK; Marcee A; Grannemann B; Kleiber B; Bettinger T; Altshuler KZ; McClelland A
    Methods Inf Med; 2002; 41(5):435-42. PubMed ID: 12501817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring the role of professional identity in the implementation of clinical decision support systems-a narrative review.
    Ackerhans S; Huynh T; Kaiser C; Schultz C
    Implement Sci; 2024 Feb; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 38347525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.
    Robertson J; Walkom E; Pearson SA; Hains I; Williamsone M; Newby D
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2010 Apr; 18(2):69-87. PubMed ID: 20441116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.
    Garg AX; Adhikari NK; McDonald H; Rosas-Arellano MP; Devereaux PJ; Beyene J; Sam J; Haynes RB
    JAMA; 2005 Mar; 293(10):1223-38. PubMed ID: 15755945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An innovative artificial intelligence-based method to compress complex models into explainable, model-agnostic and reduced decision support systems with application to healthcare (NEAR).
    Kassem K; Sperti M; Cavallo A; Vergani AM; Fassino D; Moz M; Liscio A; Banali R; Dahlweid M; Benetti L; Bruno F; Gallone G; De Filippo O; Iannaccone M; D'Ascenzo F; De Ferrari GM; Morbiducci U; Della Valle E; Deriu MA
    Artif Intell Med; 2024 May; 151():102841. PubMed ID: 38658130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the feasibility of an artificial intelligence based clinical decision support system for cutaneous melanoma detection in primary care - a mixed method study.
    Helenason J; Ekström C; Falk M; Papachristou P
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2024 Mar; 42(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 37982736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physicians' Perspectives on AI in Clinical Decision Support Systems: Interview Study of the CURATE.AI Personalized Dose Optimization Platform.
    Vijayakumar S; Lee VV; Leong QY; Hong SJ; Blasiak A; Ho D
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2023 Oct; 10():e48476. PubMed ID: 37902825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.