These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32418536)

  • 21. The optimal number of lymph nodes examined in stage II colorectal cancer and its impact of on outcomes.
    Choi HK; Law WL; Poon JT
    BMC Cancer; 2010 Jun; 10():267. PubMed ID: 20529352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study.
    Johnson PM; Malatjalian D; Porter GA
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2002; 6(6):883-88; discussion 889-90. PubMed ID: 12504228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prognostic variables in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Lin CS; Chang SC; Wei YH; Chou TY; Wu YC; Lin HC; Wang LS; Hsu WH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Apr; 87(4):1056-65. PubMed ID: 19324127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of the obesity on lymph node status in operable breast cancer patients.
    Keskin O; Aksoy S; Babacan T; Sarici F; Kertmen N; Solak M; Turkoz FP; Arik Z; Esin E; Petekkaya I; Altundag K
    J BUON; 2013; 18(4):824-30. PubMed ID: 24344004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Increased lymph node evaluation with colorectal cancer resection: does it improve detection of stage III disease?
    Kukreja SS; Esteban-Agusti E; Velasco JM; Hieken TJ
    Arch Surg; 2009 Jul; 144(7):612-7. PubMed ID: 19620539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Analysis of risk factors and prognosis of No.8p lymph node metastasis in cases with advanced gastric cancer].
    Chen L; Wei S; Ye Z; Zeng Y; Zheng Q; Xiao J; Wang Y; Zhuo C; Lin Z; Li Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 20(2):218-223. PubMed ID: 28226359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Prognostic factors of lymph node-negative metastasis gastric cancer].
    Sun D; Xu H; Huang J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 20(2):190-194. PubMed ID: 28226354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: old controversies and recent advances.
    Resch A; Langner C
    World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Dec; 19(46):8515-26. PubMed ID: 24379568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prognostic significance of lymph node status in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with lymphadenectomy.
    Liu YL; Xu HT; Jiang SX; Yang YM; Cui BB
    J Surg Oncol; 2014 Mar; 109(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 24449194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prominent Information of jN3 Positive in Stage III Colorectal Cancer Removed by D3 Dissection: Retrospective Analysis of 6866 Patients From a Multi-institutional Database in Japan.
    Shinto E; Hida JI; Kobayashi H; Hashiguchi Y; Hase K; Ueno H; Watanabe T; Sugihara K
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Apr; 61(4):447-453. PubMed ID: 29521826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prognostic value of lymph node micrometastasis in patients with colorectal cancer in Dukes stages A and B (T1-T4, N0, M0).
    Uribarrena-Amezaga R; Ortego J; Fuentes J; Raventós N; Parra P; Uribarrena-Echevarría R
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2010 Mar; 102(3):176-86. PubMed ID: 20373832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The prognostic value of the number of lymph nodes removed in patients with node-negative colorectal cancer.
    Duraker N; Civelek Çaynak Z; Hot S
    Int J Surg; 2014 Dec; 12(12):1324-7. PubMed ID: 25448653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adequate lymph node recovery improves survival in colorectal cancer patients.
    Onitilo AA; Stankowski RV; Engel JM; Doi SA
    J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 107(8):828-34. PubMed ID: 23592545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of lymph node retrieval on surgical outcomes in colorectal cancers.
    Kritsanasakul A; Boonpipattanapong T; Wanitsuwan W; Phukaoloun M; Prechawittayakul P; Sangkhathat S
    J Surg Oncol; 2012 Sep; 106(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 22886537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer resection specimens: national standards are achievable, and low numbers are associated with reduced survival.
    Norwood MG; Sutton AJ; West K; Sharpe DP; Hemingway D; Kelly MJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2010 Apr; 12(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 19207700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Emergency surgery for colorectal cancer does not result in nodal understaging compared with elective surgery.
    Patel SV; Patel SV; Brackstone M
    Can J Surg; 2014 Oct; 57(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 25265110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Clinical study on lymph node metastasis regularity in 1456 patients with gastric cancer].
    Liang J; Liang H; Deng J; Wang X; Wang X; Wu L
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1154-1160. PubMed ID: 30370515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term outcomes after surgical dissection of inguinal lymph node metastasis from rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma.
    Tanabe T; Shida D; Komukai S; Nakamura Y; Tsukamoto S; Kanemitsu Y
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jul; 19(1):733. PubMed ID: 31340778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Proposal of a new classification for stage III colorectal cancer based on the number and ratio of metastatic lymph nodes.
    Wang LP; Wang HY; Cao R; Zhu C; Wu XZ
    World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1094-102. PubMed ID: 23385643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The number of metastatic lymph nodes exhibiting poorly differentiated clusters predicts survival in patients with pStage III colorectal cancer.
    Kinoshita O; Kishimoto M; Murayama Y; Kuriu Y; Nakanishi M; Sakakura C; Otsuji E; Yanagisawa A
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Feb; 31(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 26412250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.