These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32419205)

  • 1. A Process Model of Causal Reasoning.
    Davis ZJ; Rehder B
    Cogn Sci; 2020 May; 44(5):e12839. PubMed ID: 32419205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Explanatory completeness.
    Korman J; Khemlani S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103139. PubMed ID: 32750561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Context-Dependent Bayesian Account for Causal-Based Categorization.
    Marchant N; Quillien T; Chaigneau SE
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Jan; 47(1):e13240. PubMed ID: 36680423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
    Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond Markov: Accounting for independence violations in causal reasoning.
    Rehder B
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Jun; 103():42-84. PubMed ID: 29522980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How causal structure, causal strength, and foreseeability affect moral judgments.
    Engelmann N; Waldmann MR
    Cognition; 2022 Sep; 226():105167. PubMed ID: 35660345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of mechanism knowledge in singular causation judgments.
    Stephan S; Waldmann MR
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104924. PubMed ID: 34673301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reasoning With Causal Cycles.
    Rehder B
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 5():944-1002. PubMed ID: 27859522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Naive theories and causal deduction.
    Cummins DD
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):646-58. PubMed ID: 7476249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of causal information on judgments of treatment efficacy.
    Yopchick JE; Kim NS
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 19103973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Bayesian Mutation Sampler Explains Distributions of Causal Judgments.
    Kolvoort IR; Temme N; van Maanen L
    Open Mind (Camb); 2023; 7():318-349. PubMed ID: 37416078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts.
    Shengelia T; Lagnado D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():519262. PubMed ID: 33613348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Singular clues to causality and their use in human causal judgment.
    White PA
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(1):38-75. PubMed ID: 23957568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stable Causal Relationships Are Better Causal Relationships.
    Vasilyeva N; Blanchard T; Lombrozo T
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42(4):1265-1296. PubMed ID: 29687462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Musca SC; Blanco F; Matute H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Normality and actual causal strength.
    Icard TF; Kominsky JF; Knobe J
    Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():80-93. PubMed ID: 28157584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Associative and causal reasoning accounts of causal induction: symmetries and asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic inferences.
    López FJ; Cobos PL; Caño A
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1388-98. PubMed ID: 16615386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expectations affect physical causation judgments.
    Gerstenberg T; Icard T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 31512904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects.
    Sanborn AN; Mansinghka VK; Griffiths TL
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Apr; 120(2):411-37. PubMed ID: 23458084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.