BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32419581)

  • 1. Two-tailed asymptotic inferences for the odds ratio in cross-sectional studies: evaluation of fifteen old and new methods of inference.
    Andrés AM; García JMT; Moreno FG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 30(5):900-915. PubMed ID: 32419581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One-tailed asymptotic inferences for the difference of proportions: Analysis of 97 methods of inference.
    Hernández MÁ; Andrés AM; Tejedor IH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1090-1104. PubMed ID: 29608389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tests for equivalence based on odds ratio for matched-pair design.
    Liu JP; Fan HY; Ma MC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):889-901. PubMed ID: 16279349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to use likelihood ratios to interpret evidence from randomized trials.
    Perneger TV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 136():235-242. PubMed ID: 33930527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confidence intervals for odds ratio and relative risk based on the inverse hyperbolic sine transformation.
    Fagerland MW; Newcombe RG
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2823-36. PubMed ID: 23255228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New tests for null hypothesis of non unity ratio of proportions.
    Koti KM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):229-45. PubMed ID: 17365220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion ratio based on correlated paired data.
    Peng X; Liu C; Liu S; Ma CX
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(6):1137-1152. PubMed ID: 30831053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On logit confidence intervals for the odds ratio with small samples.
    Agresti A
    Biometrics; 1999 Jun; 55(2):597-602. PubMed ID: 11318220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical power of likelihood ratio and Wald tests in latent class models with covariates.
    Gudicha DW; Schmittmann VD; Vermunt JK
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1824-1837. PubMed ID: 28039681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power evaluation of asymptotic tests for comparing two binomial proportions to detect direct and indirect association in large-scale studies.
    Emily M; Friguet C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2780-2799. PubMed ID: 26468267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exact likelihood ratio and score confidence intervals for the binomial proportion.
    Somerville MC; Brown RS
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):120-8. PubMed ID: 23471686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test Statistics and Confidence Intervals to Establish Noninferiority between Treatments with Ordinal Categorical Data.
    Zhang F; Miyaoka E; Huang F; Tanaka Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):921-38. PubMed ID: 24919157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unconditional efficient one-sided confidence limits for the odds ratio based on conditional likelihood.
    Lloyd CJ; Moldovan MV
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5136-46. PubMed ID: 17437251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confidence intervals, hypothesis tests, and sample sizes for the prevented fraction in cross-sectional studies.
    Gargiullo PM; Rothenberg RB; Wilson HG
    Stat Med; 1995 Jan; 14(1):51-72. PubMed ID: 7701158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semiparametric likelihood inference for left-truncated and right-censored data.
    Huang CY; Ning J; Qin J
    Biostatistics; 2015 Oct; 16(4):785-98. PubMed ID: 25796430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A discussion on significance indices for contingency tables under small sample sizes.
    Oliveira NL; Pereira CAB; Diniz MA; Polpo A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0199102. PubMed ID: 30071022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of inferential methods for the net benefit and win ratio statistics.
    Verbeeck J; Ozenne B; Anderson WN
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 30(5):765-782. PubMed ID: 32097079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Likelihood inference on the relative risk in split-cluster designs.
    Shoukri MM; Colak D; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 21335588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eight interval estimators of a common rate ratio under stratified Poisson sampling.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1283-96. PubMed ID: 15083483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of the relative excess risk due to interaction and associated confidence bounds.
    Richardson DB; Kaufman JS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):756-60. PubMed ID: 19211620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.