These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32419899)

  • 1. Fine-tuning the use of a skin prick test device.
    Kahveci M; Karabulut E; Soyer O; Sahiner UM; Buyuktiryaki B; Sekerel BE
    World Allergy Organ J; 2020 May; 13(5):100122. PubMed ID: 32419899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing the use of a skin prick test device on children.
    Buyuktiryaki B; Sahiner UM; Karabulut E; Cavkaytar O; Tuncer A; Sekerel BE
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2013; 162(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 23816800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The comparison of reactions in skin prick test performed with the standardized lancet and the injection needle].
    Semik-Orzech A; Barczyk A; Pierzchała W
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jun; 24(144):495-501. PubMed ID: 18702329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of skin prick test results in epidemiologic studies: a comparison of two devices.
    Illi S; Garcia-Marcos L; Hernando V; Guillen JJ; Liese A; von Mutius E
    Allergy; 1998 Apr; 53(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 9574876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The results of skin prick testing in patients with allergic rhinitis: a comparison between a multiple lancet device and a single lancet.
    Ateş A; Kinikli G; Turgay M; Aydoğan N; Duman M
    Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2004; 22(2-3):109-14. PubMed ID: 15565947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The shape of and applied weight on skin prick lancets critically affect the wheal size in the skin prick test.
    Bartko EA; Elberling J; Mosbech H
    World Allergy Organ J; 2024 Jun; 17(6):100915. PubMed ID: 38974945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative performance of five commercial prick skin test devices.
    Nelson HS; Rosloniec DM; McCall LI; Iklé D
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1993 Nov; 92(5):750-6. PubMed ID: 8227867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of two lancets in the skin prick test].
    Castro Almarales RL; Primo Valdés SI; González León M; Navarro Viltre BI; Alvarez Castañeda M; Irarragorri Toledo C; Ronquillo Díaz M; García Gómez I; Labrada Rosado A
    Rev Alerg Mex; 2005; 52(5):188-93. PubMed ID: 16579181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performances of an improved device for skin prick tests.
    Caimmi D; Masse MS; Chiriac AM; Demoly P
    Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol; 2013; 26(1):235-7. PubMed ID: 23527727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of five techniques of skin prick tests used routinely in Europe.
    Masse MS; Granger Vallée A; Chiriac A; Dhivert-Donnadieu H; Bousquet-Rouanet L; Bousquet PJ; Demoly P
    Allergy; 2011 Nov; 66(11):1415-9. PubMed ID: 21797883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of applied force and device design on skin prick test performance.
    Chiaranairungroj M; Chatchatee P; Srituravanich W
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2023 Mar; 130(3):312-316. PubMed ID: 36436784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [COMPARISON OF WHEAL SIZE INDUCED BY BIFURCATED NEEDLE
    Masukane S; Matsui T; Tokumo N; Makino A; Kitamura K; Takasato Y; Sugiura S; Ito K
    Arerugi; 2022; 71(5):389-396. PubMed ID: 35831164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skin prick testing using allergen-coated lancets: a comparison between a multiple lancet device and a single lancet applied with varying pressures.
    Phagoo SB; Wilson NM; Silverman M
    Clin Exp Allergy; 1991 Sep; 21(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 1742651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance characteristics of a new automated enzyme immunoassay for the measurement of allergen-specific IgE. Summary of the probability outcomes comparing results of allergen skin testing to results obtained with the HYTEC system and CAP system.
    Nolte H; DuBuske LM
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1997 Jul; 79(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 9236496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance and Pain Tolerability of Current Diagnostic Allergy Skin Prick Test Devices.
    Tversky JR; Chelladurai Y; McGready J; Hamilton RG
    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2015; 3(6):888-93. PubMed ID: 26553615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of two skin test methodologies and allergens from two different manufacturers.
    Rhodius R; Wickens K; Cheng S; Crane J
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2002 Apr; 88(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 11991555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of a new lancet and a hypodermic needle for skin prick testing.
    Dirksen A; Mosbech H; Søborg M; Biering I
    Allergy; 1983 Jul; 38(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 6614408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The skin prick test.
    Frati F; Incorvaia C; Cavaliere C; Di Cara G; Marcucci F; Esposito S; Masieri S
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2018; 32(1 Suppl. 1):19-24. PubMed ID: 29552869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro diagnostic evaluation of patients with inhalant allergies: summary of probability outcomes comparing results of CLA- and CAP-specific immunoglobulin E test systems.
    Nepper-Christensen S; Backer V; DuBuske LM; Nolte H
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2003; 24(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 12974191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High Histamine Control Concentration Leads to False Negative Allergy Skin Testing.
    Amirneni A; Tversky J
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2021 Nov; 35(6):854-860. PubMed ID: 33827292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.