These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32420097)

  • 1. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of multilayer cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking derived longitudinal and circumferential strain.
    Ananthapadmanabhan S; Deng E; Femia G; Tang S; Koh ES; Schuster A; Puranik R; Gupta P; Nguyen T; Dimitri H; Otton J
    Cardiovasc Diagn Ther; 2020 Apr; 10(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 32420097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Layer-Specific Strain Is Preload Dependent: Comparison between Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature-Tracking.
    Grund FF; Kristensen CB; Myhr KA; Vejlstrup N; Hassager C; Mogelvang R
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2021 Apr; 34(4):377-387. PubMed ID: 33421611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct comparison of multilayer left ventricular global longitudinal strain using CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography.
    Ananthapadmanabhan S; Vo G; Nguyen T; Dimitri H; Otton J
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Feb; 21(1):107. PubMed ID: 33607946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of feature tracking, fast-SENC, and myocardial tagging for global and segmental left ventricular strain.
    Bucius P; Erley J; Tanacli R; Zieschang V; Giusca S; Korosoglou G; Steen H; Stehning C; Pieske B; Pieske-Kraigher E; Schuster A; Lapinskas T; Kelle S
    ESC Heart Fail; 2020 Apr; 7(2):523-532. PubMed ID: 31800152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment: Are CMR feature-tracking algorithms useful in the clinical setting?
    Pierpaolo P; Rolf S; Manuel BP; Davide C; Dresselaers T; Claus P; Bogaert J
    Radiol Med; 2020 May; 125(5):444-450. PubMed ID: 32125636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regional left ventricular endocardial strains estimated from low-dose 4DCT: Comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking.
    Manohar A; Colvert GM; Ortuño JE; Chen Z; Yang J; Colvert BT; Bandettini WP; Chen MY; Ledesma-Carbayo MJ; McVeigh ER
    Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 49(9):5841-5854. PubMed ID: 35751864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment comparing the reproducibility of four commercially available CMR-feature tracking algorithms.
    Barreiro-Pérez M; Curione D; Symons R; Claus P; Voigt JU; Bogaert J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5137-5147. PubMed ID: 29872912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Left ventricular mechanics assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of high-resolution speckle tracking and feature tracking.
    Aurich M; Keller M; Greiner S; Steen H; Aus dem Siepen F; Riffel J; Katus HA; Buss SJ; Mereles D
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1370-1378. PubMed ID: 27013249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advanced myocardial characterization in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: feasibility of CMR-based feature tracking strain analysis in a case-control study.
    Yang L; Zhang L; Cao S; Gao C; Xu H; Song T; Zhang X; Wang K
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6118-6128. PubMed ID: 32588208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of global and regional magnetic resonance feature tracking derived strain parameters of the left and right ventricle.
    Schmidt B; Dick A; Treutlein M; Schiller P; Bunck AC; Maintz D; Baeßler B
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():97-105. PubMed ID: 28267556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation and Comparison of Quantitative Right Ventricular Strain Assessment by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Pulmonary Hypertension Using Feature Tracking and Deformable Registration Algorithms.
    Song J; Chen Y; Cui Y; Kong X; Liu J; Cao Y; Zhou X; Wetzl J; Shi H
    Acad Radiol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):e306-e313. PubMed ID: 32624401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards standardized postprocessing of global longitudinal strain by feature tracking - OptiStrain CMR-FT study.
    Heinke R; Pathan F; Le M; D'Angelo T; Winau L; Arendt C; Vogl TJ; Zeiher A; Nagel E; Puntmann VO
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2019 Nov; 19(1):267. PubMed ID: 31775656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reference ranges for three-dimensional feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance: comparison with two-dimensional methodology and relevance of age and gender.
    Liu B; Dardeer AM; Moody WE; Hayer MK; Baig S; Price AM; Leyva F; Edwards NC; Steeds RP
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 34(5):761-775. PubMed ID: 29181827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the reproducibility of two cine-derived strain software programmes in disease states.
    Graham-Brown MP; Gulsin GS; Parke K; Wormleighton J; Lai FY; Athithan L; Arnold JR; Burton JO; McCann GP; Singh AS
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():51-58. PubMed ID: 30927959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Global Longitudinal and Circumferential Strain Using Computed Tomography Feature Tracking: Intra-Individual Comparison with CMR Feature Tracking and Myocardial Tagging in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.
    Miskinyte E; Bucius P; Erley J; Zamani SM; Tanacli R; Stehning C; Schneeweis C; Lapinskas T; Pieske B; Falk V; Gebker R; Pedrizzetti G; Solowjowa N; Kelle S
    J Clin Med; 2019 Sep; 8(9):. PubMed ID: 31509951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct comparison of coronary microvascular obstruction evaluation using CMR feature tracking and layer-specific speckle tracking echocardiography in STEMI patients.
    Wang C; Wang L; Yin J; Xuan H; Chen J; Li D; Hou X; Xu T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Feb; 40(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 37953371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking: Impact of training on observer performance and reproducibility.
    Backhaus SJ; Metschies G; Billing M; Kowallick JT; Gertz RJ; Lapinskas T; Pieske B; Lotz J; Bigalke B; Kutty S; Hasenfuß G; Beerbaum P; Kelle S; Schuster A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210127. PubMed ID: 30682045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Myocardial strain assessed by feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with a variety of cardiovascular diseases - A comparison with echocardiography.
    Pryds K; Larsen AH; Hansen MS; Grøndal AYK; Tougaard RS; Hansson NH; Clemmensen TS; Løgstrup BB; Wiggers H; Kim WY; Bøtker HE; Nielsen RR
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11296. PubMed ID: 31383914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional left ventricular global strain using coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with heart failure: Comparison with 3T cardiac MR.
    Wang R; Fang Z; Wang H; Schoepf UJ; Emrich T; Giovagnoli D; Biles E; Zhou Z; Du Z; Liu T; Xu L
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 135():109485. PubMed ID: 33401113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-vendor reproducibility and accuracy of segmental left ventricular strain measurements using CMR feature tracking.
    Dobrovie M; Barreiro-Pérez M; Curione D; Symons R; Claus P; Voigt JU; Bogaert J
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6846-6857. PubMed ID: 31297633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.