189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32420348)
1. Comparison of Cochlear Implant Magnets and Their MRI Artifact Size.
Todt I; Guerkov R; Gehl HB; Sudhoff H
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():5086291. PubMed ID: 32420348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of head position on cochlear implant MRI artifact.
Ay N; Gehl HB; Sudhoff H; Todt I
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Aug; 278(8):2763-2767. PubMed ID: 32909061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI Artifacts and Cochlear Implant Positioning at 3 T In Vivo.
Todt I; Rademacher G; Mittmann P; Wagner J; Mutze S; Ernst A
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):972-6. PubMed ID: 25634466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Head Position and Magnetic Resonance Sequence on Cochlear Implant-Related Artifact Size and Internal Auditory Canal Visibility.
Kalmanson OA; Talmage GD; Honce JM; Gubbels SP
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Feb; 44(2):e73-e80. PubMed ID: 36624593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. First MRI With New Cochlear Implant With Rotatable Internal Magnet System and Proposal for Standardization of Reporting Magnet-Related Artifact Size.
Cass ND; Honce JM; O'Dell AL; Gubbels SP
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Aug; 40(7):883-891. PubMed ID: 31219967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterizing Cochlear Implant Magnet-Related MRI Artifact.
Cass ND; Totten DJ; Ross JD; O'Malley MR
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2023 Mar; 132(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 35382589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI-induced artifact by a cochlear implant with a novel magnet system: an experimental cadaver study.
Canzi P; Aprile F; Simoncelli A; Manfrin M; Magnetto M; Lafe E; Minervini D; Avato I; Terrani S; Scribante A; Gazibegovic D; Benazzo M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 278(10):3753-3762. PubMed ID: 33206227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image Quality and Artifact Reduction of a Cochlear Implant With Rotatable Magnets.
Winchester A; Kay-Rivest E; Bruno M; Hagiwara M; Moonis G; Jethanamest D
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e223-e229. PubMed ID: 36806625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifacts and Cochlear Implant Positioning at 1.5 T In Vivo.
Schröder D; Grupe G; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Ernst A; Seidl R; Mittmann P
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():9163285. PubMed ID: 30533442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pain Free 3 T MRI Scans in Cochlear Implantees.
Todt I; Tittel A; Ernst A; Mittmann P; Mutze S
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e401-e404. PubMed ID: 28938274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system.
Canzi P; Magnetto M; Simoncelli A; Manfrin M; Aprile F; Lafe E; Carlotto E; Avato I; Scribante A; Preda L; Benazzo M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 279(6):2889-2898. PubMed ID: 34370074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants.
Todt I; Rademacher G; Mittmann P; Mutze S; Ernst A
HNO; 2017 Aug; 65(Suppl 2):81-86. PubMed ID: 28116456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of MRI in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with and without retained magnet.
Walker B; Norton S; Phillips G; Christianson E; Horn D; Ou H
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jun; 109():44-49. PubMed ID: 29728183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Receiver Position and Its Temporal Changes.
Grupe G; Rademacher G; Hofmann S; Stratmann A; Mittmann P; Mutze S; Ernst A; Todt I
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e558-e562. PubMed ID: 29135877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Systematic Review of Cochlear Implant-Related Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact: Implications for Clinical Imaging.
Berry JM; Tansey JB; Wu L; Choudhri A; Yawn RJ; MacDonald CB; Richard C
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):204-214. PubMed ID: 38260952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of magnetic resonance imaging-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: a single-center retrospective study.
Rupp R; Balk M; Sievert M; Leibl V; Schleder S; Allner M; Iro H; Hoppe U; Hornung J; Gostian AO
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Apr; 52(1):28. PubMed ID: 37085925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Safety and Imaging Quality.
Carlson ML; Neff BA; Link MJ; Lane JI; Watson RE; McGee KP; Bernstein MA; Driscoll CL
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 25931165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [MRI in patients with auditory implants equipped with implanted magnets-an update : Overview and procedural management].
Nospes S; Brockmann MA; Läßig A
Radiologe; 2019 Jan; 59(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 30350108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of bandaging techniques to prevent cochlear implant magnet displacement following MRI.
Leinung M; Loth AG; Kroth M; Burck I; Stöver T; Helbig S
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Nov; 278(11):4209-4216. PubMed ID: 33386972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
