240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32421179)
1. Association Between State-Level Criminal Justice-Focused Prenatal Substance Use Policies in the US and Substance Use-Related Foster Care Admissions and Family Reunification.
Sanmartin MX; Ali MM; Lynch S; Aktas A
JAMA Pediatr; 2020 Aug; 174(8):782-788. PubMed ID: 32421179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The road to reunification: Family- and state system-factors associated with successful reunification for children ages zero-to-five.
LaBrenz CA; Fong R; Cubbin C
Child Abuse Negl; 2020 Jan; 99():104252. PubMed ID: 31765849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Family reunification.
Wulczyn F
Future Child; 2004; 14(1):94-113. PubMed ID: 15072020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. State-level policies and reunification: A multi-level survival analysis.
LaBrenz CA; Jenkins L; Huang H; Ryan SD; Panisch LS; Kim Y; Baiden P
Child Abuse Negl; 2023 Dec; 146():106502. PubMed ID: 37844460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and stability for foster children: the policy context.
Allen M; Bissell M
Future Child; 2004; 14(1):48-73. PubMed ID: 15072018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and Implementation of State and Federal Child Welfare Laws Related to Drug Use in Pregnancy.
McCOURT AD; White SA; Bandara S; Schall T; Goodman DJ; Patel E; McGINTY EE
Milbank Q; 2022 Dec; 100(4):1076-1120. PubMed ID: 36510665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examining the role of methamphetamine in permanency: A competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship, and adoption.
Akin BA; Brook J; Lloyd MH
Am J Orthopsychiatry; 2015 Mar; 85(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 25822603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Racial/ethnic disproportionality in reunification across U.S. child welfare systems.
LaBrenz CA; Findley E; Graaf G; Baiden P; Kim J; Choi MJ; Chakravarty S
Child Abuse Negl; 2021 Apr; 114():104894. PubMed ID: 33540210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Substance use disorder treatment admissions and state-level prenatal substance use policies: Evidence from a national treatment database.
Kozhimannil KB; Dowd WN; Ali MM; Novak P; Chen J
Addict Behav; 2019 Mar; 90():272-277. PubMed ID: 30472535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maltreatment following reunification: predictors of subsequent Child Protective Services contact after children return home.
Connell CM; Vanderploeg JJ; Katz KH; Caron C; Saunders L; Tebes JK
Child Abuse Negl; 2009 Apr; 33(4):218-28. PubMed ID: 19327834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reunification for young children of color with substance removals: An intersectional analysis of longitudinal national data.
Lloyd Sieger MH
Child Abuse Negl; 2020 Oct; 108():104664. PubMed ID: 32799013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association of Punitive and Reporting State Policies Related to Substance Use in Pregnancy With Rates of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.
Faherty LJ; Kranz AM; Russell-Fritch J; Patrick SW; Cantor J; Stein BD
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Nov; 2(11):e1914078. PubMed ID: 31722022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of a Parenting Intervention on Foster Care Reentry After Reunification Among Substance-Affected Families: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
Akin BA; Brook J; Lloyd MH; McDonald TP
Child Maltreat; 2017 Aug; 22(3):194-204. PubMed ID: 28393533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How does family drug treatment court participation affect child welfare outcomes?
Gifford EJ; Eldred LM; Vernerey A; Sloan FA
Child Abuse Negl; 2014 Oct; 38(10):1659-70. PubMed ID: 24736039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Research outcomes of prenatal substance exposure and the need to review policies and procedures regarding child abuse reporting.
Barth RP
Child Welfare; 2001; 80(2):275-96. PubMed ID: 11291905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does subsequent criminal justice involvement predict foster care and termination of parental rights for children born to incarcerated women?
Kubiak SP; Kasiborski N; Karim N; Schmittel E
Soc Work Public Health; 2012; 27(1-2):129-47. PubMed ID: 22239382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of a family treatment court on child permanency and safety.
Mersky JP; Lee CP; Liu X; Janczewski CE
Child Abuse Negl; 2023 Dec; 146():106512. PubMed ID: 37866252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Justice or Injustice: a History and Critique of the New York State Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs.
Bailly RM; DeFazio DM
Albany Law Rev; 2017; 80(3):1181-225. PubMed ID: 30990589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Punitive legal responses to prenatal drug use in the United States: A survey of state policies and systematic review of their public health impacts.
Bruzelius E; Underhill K; Askari MS; Kajeepeta S; Bates L; Prins SJ; Jarlenski M; Martins SS
Int J Drug Policy; 2024 Apr; 126():104380. PubMed ID: 38484529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do specialty courts achieve better outcomes for children in foster care than general courts?
Sloan FA; Gifford EJ; Eldred LM; Acquah KF; Blevins CE
Eval Rev; 2013 Feb; 37(1):3-34. PubMed ID: 23737613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
