These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32421414)

  • 1. Outcomes of the First 1300 Adult Heart Transplants in the United States After the Allocation Policy Change.
    Kilic A; Hickey G; Mathier MA; Kormos RL; Sultan I; Gleason TG; Keebler ME
    Circulation; 2020 May; 141(20):1662-1664. PubMed ID: 32421414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do Patients Supported With Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Have a Sufficient Risk of Death to Justify a Priority Allocation? A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Patients Listed in UNOS Status 2.
    Mastrobuoni S; Dell'Aquila AM; Van Caenegem O; Poncelet A; Jacquet LM; Garcia J
    Transplantation; 2018 Jun; 102(6):e288-e294. PubMed ID: 29346259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time for change in United States donor heart allocation policy.
    Kobashigawa JA
    JACC Heart Fail; 2014 Apr; 2(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 24720926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of the Eurotransplant high-urgency heart allocation system on the outcome of transplant candidates in Germany.
    Haneya A; Haake N; Diez C; Puehler T; Cremer J; Schmid C; Hirt SW
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Mar; 59(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 21391179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of the organ allocation policy on a patient's chances of undergoing heart transplantation and the posttransplantation survival rate.
    Tsao CI; Chou NK; Chi NH; Chen SC; Ko WJ; Yu HY; Chen YS; Wang SS
    Transplant Proc; 2012 May; 44(4):881-2. PubMed ID: 22564573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heart allocation in the United States: intended and unintended consequences.
    Givertz MM
    Circ Heart Fail; 2012 Mar; 5(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 22438519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Matching the Market for Heart Transplantation.
    Hsich EM
    Circ Heart Fail; 2016 Apr; 9(4):e002679. PubMed ID: 27072859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Liver Simulated Allocation Modeling: Were the Predictions Accurate for Share 35?
    Goel A; Kim WR; Pyke J; Schladt DP; Kasiske BL; Snyder JJ; Lake JR; Israni AK
    Transplantation; 2018 May; 102(5):769-774. PubMed ID: 29309379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of the 2006 U.S. thoracic organ allocation change: analysis of local impact on organ procurement and heart transplantation.
    Nativi JN; Kfoury AG; Myrick C; Peters M; Renlund D; Gilbert EM; Bader F; Singhal AK; Everitt M; Fisher P; Bull DA; Selzman C; Stehlik J
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2010 Mar; 29(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 19782588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential Impact of the Proposed Revised UNOS Thoracic Organ Allocation System.
    Rao P; Smith R; Khalpey Z
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018; 30(2):129-133. PubMed ID: 29409980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heart Transplantation in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.
    Fynn-Thompson F
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2019; 15(2):145-148. PubMed ID: 31384378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex Differences in Mortality Based on United Network for Organ Sharing Status While Awaiting Heart Transplantation.
    Hsich EM; Blackstone EH; Thuita L; McNamara DM; Rogers JG; Ishwaran H; Schold JD
    Circ Heart Fail; 2017 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 28611123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decline in heart transplant wait list mortality in the United States following broader regional sharing of donor hearts.
    Singh TP; Almond CS; Taylor DO; Graham DA
    Circ Heart Fail; 2012 Mar; 5(2):249-58. PubMed ID: 22247484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Geographic disparities in heart transplantation persist under the new allocation policy.
    Hess NR; Seese LM; Sultan I; Wang Y; Hickey GW; Kilic A
    Clin Transplant; 2021 Nov; 35(11):e14459. PubMed ID: 34398485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acceptable Post-Heart Transplant Outcomes Support Temporary MCS Prioritization in the New OPTN|UNOS Heart Allocation Policy.
    Reich H; Ramzy D; Moriguchi J; Dimbil S; Levine R; Passano E; Kittleson M; Cole R; Czer L; Chang D; Geft D; Trento A; Chikwe J; Kobashigawa J; Esmailian F
    Transplant Proc; 2021; 53(1):353-357. PubMed ID: 32650992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in United States heart allocation: A community energized to improve policy.
    Rogers JG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Dec; 152(6):1484-1486. PubMed ID: 27692950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Invited commentary.
    Reichenspurner H
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Mar; 59(2):98. PubMed ID: 21500396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of kidney allocation policy.
    Stegall MD
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2005 Nov; 46(5):974-5. PubMed ID: 16253742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Balancing supply and demand: Review of the 2018 donor heart allocation policy.
    Taylor LJ; Fiedler AG
    J Card Surg; 2020 Jul; 35(7):1583-1588. PubMed ID: 32400060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The change in heart allocation policy in the United States: is it working as designed?
    Vega JD
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2010 Mar; 29(3):255-6. PubMed ID: 20036163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.