These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32421556)
1. Using stated preference valuation in the offshore environment to support marine planning. Börger T; Hooper TL; Austen MC; Marcone O; Rendón O J Environ Manage; 2020 Jul; 265():110520. PubMed ID: 32421556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cumulative impacts on seabed habitats: an indicator for assessments of good environmental status. Korpinen S; Meidinger M; Laamanen M Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Sep; 74(1):311-9. PubMed ID: 23849951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A spatial risk approach towards integrated marine spatial planning: A case study on European hake nursery areas in the North Alboran Sea. Muñoz M; Reul A; Gil de Sola L; Lauerburg RAM; Tello O; Gimpel A; Stelzenmüller V Mar Environ Res; 2018 Nov; 142():190-207. PubMed ID: 30361105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New perspectives on sea use management: initial findings from European experience with marine spatial planning. Douvere F; Ehler CN J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 18786758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Process-driven and biological characterisation and mapping of seabed habitats sensitive to trawling. Foveau A; Vaz S; Desroy N; Kostylev VE PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0184486. PubMed ID: 28981504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Typology and indicators of ecosystem services for marine spatial planning and management. Böhnke-Henrichs A; Baulcomb C; Koss R; Hussain SS; de Groot RS J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 130():135-45. PubMed ID: 24076513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of the marine environment: integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach. Atkins JP; Burdon D; Elliott M; Gregory AJ Mar Pollut Bull; 2011 Feb; 62(2):215-26. PubMed ID: 21215974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Emerging conservation challenges and prospects in an era of offshore hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation. Kark S; Brokovich E; Mazor T; Levin N Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1573-85. PubMed ID: 26219342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Valuing ecosystem services in terms of ecological risks and returns. Abson DJ; Termansen M Conserv Biol; 2011 Apr; 25(2):250-8. PubMed ID: 21175826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is economic valuation of ecosystem services useful to decision-makers? Lessons learned from Australian coastal and marine management. Marre JB; Thébaud O; Pascoe S; Jennings S; Boncoeur J; Coglan L J Environ Manage; 2016 Aug; 178():52-62. PubMed ID: 27136617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inclusion of condition in natural capital assessments is critical to the implementation of marine nature-based solutions. Watson SCL; Watson GJ; Beaumont NJ; Preston J Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 838(Pt 2):156026. PubMed ID: 35595143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are European Blue Economy ambitions in conflict with European environmental visions? Andersen JH; Al-Hamdani Z; Carstensen J; Edelvang K; Egekvist J; Kaae BC; Hammer KJ; Therese Harvey E; Leth JO; McClintock W; Murray C; Olafsson AS; Olsen J; Sveegaard S; Tougaard J Ambio; 2023 Dec; 52(12):1981-1991. PubMed ID: 37639203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unravelling the ecological impacts of large-scale offshore wind farms in the Mediterranean Sea. Lloret J; Turiel A; Solé J; Berdalet E; Sabatés A; Olivares A; Gili JM; Vila-Subirós J; Sardá R Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 824():153803. PubMed ID: 35150689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Valuation of ecotoxicological impacts from tributyltin based on a quantitative environmental assessment framework. Noring M; Håkansson C; Dahlgren E Ambio; 2016 Feb; 45(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 26178630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First high-resolution marine natural capital mapping in the coastal waters of Chinese mainland. Zhang Y; Chen K; Xu Z; Fang K; Ye G J Environ Manage; 2024 Jan; 349():119596. PubMed ID: 37992665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ecosystem objectives to support the UK vision for the marine environment. Rogers SI; Tasker ML; Earll R; Gubbay S Mar Pollut Bull; 2007 Feb; 54(2):128-44. PubMed ID: 17223138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Framing future trajectories of human activities in the German North Sea to inform cumulative effects assessments and marine spatial planning. Stelzenmüller V; Rehren J; Örey S; Lemmen C; Krishna S; Hasenbein M; Püts M; Probst WN; Diekmann R; Scheffran J; Bos OG; Wirtz K J Environ Manage; 2024 Jan; 349():119507. PubMed ID: 37956520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the value of non-use benefits from small changes in the provision of ecosystem services. Dutton A; Edwards-Jones G; Macdonald DW Conserv Biol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):1479-87. PubMed ID: 20560999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Linking marine ecosystems with the services they supply: what are the relevant service providing units? Culhane FE; Frid CLJ; Royo Gelabert E; White L; Robinson LA Ecol Appl; 2018 Oct; 28(7):1740-1751. PubMed ID: 30133075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ecosystem valuation: a sequential decision support system and quality assessment issues. Turner RK; Morse-Jones S; Fisher B Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2010 Jan; 1185():79-101. PubMed ID: 20146763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]