These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32421638)
1. Specifying advantages of multi-modal cueing: Quantifying improvements with augmented tactile information. White TL; Hancock PA Appl Ergon; 2020 Oct; 88():103146. PubMed ID: 32421638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-modal links among vision, audition, and touch in complex environments. Ferris TK; Sarter NB Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 18354968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of auditory and tactile crossmodal cues in a dual-task visual and auditory scenario. Hopkins K; Kass SJ; Blalock LD; Brill JC Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 27267493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of physical workload and modality of information presentation on pattern recognition and navigation task performance by high-fit young males. Zahabi M; Zhang W; Pankok C; Lau MY; Shirley J; Kaber D Ergonomics; 2017 Nov; 60(11):1516-1527. PubMed ID: 28452255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What You Don't Notice Can Harm You: Age-Related Differences in Detecting Concurrent Visual, Auditory, and Tactile Cues. Pitts BJ; Sarter N Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):445-464. PubMed ID: 29470102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of auditory and tactile warning on response to visual hazards under a noisy environment. Murata A; Kuroda T; Karwowski W Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():58-67. PubMed ID: 28166900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task. Miles E; Poliakoff E; Brown RJ Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vision and Haptics Share Spatial Attentional Resources and Visuotactile Integration Is Not Affected by High Attentional Load. Wahn B; König P Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):371-92. PubMed ID: 26288905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What happens in between? Human oscillatory brain activity related to crossmodal spatial cueing. Trenner MU; Heekeren HR; Bauer M; Rössner K; Wenzel R; Villringer A; Fahle M PLoS One; 2008 Jan; 3(1):e1467. PubMed ID: 18213376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task. Jones A; Forster B Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human interaction with robotic systems: performance and workload evaluations. Reinerman-Jones L; Barber DJ; Szalma JL; Hancock PA Ergonomics; 2017 Oct; 60(10):1351-1368. PubMed ID: 28745552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced perception and performance by multimodal threat cueing in simulated combat vehicle. Oskarsson PA; Eriksson L; Carlander O Hum Factors; 2012 Feb; 54(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 22409107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multisensory Perception of Contradictory Information in an Environment of Varying Reliability: Evidence for Conscious Perception and Optimal Causal Inference. Mahani MN; Sheybani S; Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R; Ahmadabadi MN Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3167. PubMed ID: 28600573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]