These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32421638)

  • 1. Specifying advantages of multi-modal cueing: Quantifying improvements with augmented tactile information.
    White TL; Hancock PA
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Oct; 88():103146. PubMed ID: 32421638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-modal links among vision, audition, and touch in complex environments.
    Ferris TK; Sarter NB
    Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 18354968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of auditory and tactile crossmodal cues in a dual-task visual and auditory scenario.
    Hopkins K; Kass SJ; Blalock LD; Brill JC
    Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 27267493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of physical workload and modality of information presentation on pattern recognition and navigation task performance by high-fit young males.
    Zahabi M; Zhang W; Pankok C; Lau MY; Shirley J; Kaber D
    Ergonomics; 2017 Nov; 60(11):1516-1527. PubMed ID: 28452255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What You Don't Notice Can Harm You: Age-Related Differences in Detecting Concurrent Visual, Auditory, and Tactile Cues.
    Pitts BJ; Sarter N
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):445-464. PubMed ID: 29470102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional reorienting triggers spatial asymmetries in a search task with cross-modal spatial cueing.
    Paladini RE; Diana L; Zito GA; Nyffeler T; Wyss P; Mosimann UP; Müri RM; Nef T; Cazzoli D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190677. PubMed ID: 29293637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of auditory and tactile warning on response to visual hazards under a noisy environment.
    Murata A; Kuroda T; Karwowski W
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():58-67. PubMed ID: 28166900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision.
    Spence C; Nicholls ME; Gillespie N; Driver J
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 May; 60(4):544-57. PubMed ID: 9628989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving target detection in visual search through the augmenting multi-sensory cues.
    Hancock PA; Mercado JE; Merlo J; Van Erp JB
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(5):729-38. PubMed ID: 23510197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tactile remapping beyond space.
    Azañón E; Camacho K; Soto-Faraco S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1858-67. PubMed ID: 20584190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating the time course of tactile reflexive attention using a non-spatial discrimination task.
    Miles E; Poliakoff E; Brown RJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 18262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vision and Haptics Share Spatial Attentional Resources and Visuotactile Integration Is Not Affected by High Attentional Load.
    Wahn B; König P
    Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):371-92. PubMed ID: 26288905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tactile temporal offset cues reduce visual representational momentum.
    Merz S; Frings C; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2113-2122. PubMed ID: 33782912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What happens in between? Human oscillatory brain activity related to crossmodal spatial cueing.
    Trenner MU; Heekeren HR; Bauer M; Rössner K; Wenzel R; Villringer A; Fahle M
    PLoS One; 2008 Jan; 3(1):e1467. PubMed ID: 18213376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lost in vision: ERP correlates of exogenous tactile attention when engaging in a visual task.
    Jones A; Forster B
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 23340481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human interaction with robotic systems: performance and workload evaluations.
    Reinerman-Jones L; Barber DJ; Szalma JL; Hancock PA
    Ergonomics; 2017 Oct; 60(10):1351-1368. PubMed ID: 28745552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhanced perception and performance by multimodal threat cueing in simulated combat vehicle.
    Oskarsson PA; Eriksson L; Carlander O
    Hum Factors; 2012 Feb; 54(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 22409107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multisensory Perception of Contradictory Information in an Environment of Varying Reliability: Evidence for Conscious Perception and Optimal Causal Inference.
    Mahani MN; Sheybani S; Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R; Ahmadabadi MN
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3167. PubMed ID: 28600573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.