613 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32421656)
1. Inter-patient variations in flow boundary conditions at middle cerebral artery from 7T PC-MRI and influence on Computational Fluid Dynamics of intracranial aneurysms.
Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H; van Ooij P; Veeturi SS; Tutino VM; Zwanenburg JJ; Meng H
Comput Biol Med; 2020 May; 120():103759. PubMed ID: 32421656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Local hemodynamics at the rupture point of cerebral aneurysms determined by computational fluid dynamics analysis.
Omodaka S; Sugiyama S; Inoue T; Funamoto K; Fujimura M; Shimizu H; Hayase T; Takahashi A; Tominaga T
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2012; 34(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 22965244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of inlet waveforms on computational hemodynamics of patient-specific intracranial aneurysms.
Xiang J; Siddiqui AH; Meng H
J Biomech; 2014 Dec; 47(16):3882-90. PubMed ID: 25446264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of using generic flow conditions to quantify aneurysmal haemodynamics: A comparison against simulations incorporating boundary conditions measured in vivo.
Li B; Liu T; Liu J; Liu Y; Cao B; Zhao X; Wang W; Shi M; Zhang L; Xu K; Chen M; Wen C; Zhang M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Oct; 225():107034. PubMed ID: 35914441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How patient-specific do internal carotid artery inflow rates need to be for computational fluid dynamics of cerebral aneurysms?
Najafi M; Cancelliere NM; Brina O; Bouillot P; Vargas MI; Delattre BM; Pereira VM; Steinman DA
J Neurointerv Surg; 2021 May; 13(5):459-464. PubMed ID: 32732256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A study of wall shear stress in 12 aneurysms with respect to different viscosity models and flow conditions.
Evju Ø; Valen-Sendstad K; Mardal KA
J Biomech; 2013 Nov; 46(16):2802-8. PubMed ID: 24099744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Using Morphological and Hemodynamic Biomarkers Evaluated from Magnetic Resonance Fluid Dynamics and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Perera R; Isoda H; Ishiguro K; Mizuno T; Takehara Y; Terada M; Tanoi C; Naito T; Sakahara H; Hiramatsu H; Namba H; Izumi T; Wakabayashi T; Kosugi T; Onishi Y; Alley M; Komori Y; Ikeda M; Naganawa S
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2020 Dec; 19(4):333-344. PubMed ID: 31956175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms between MR fluid dynamics using 3D cine phase-contrast MRI and MR-based computational fluid dynamics.
Isoda H; Ohkura Y; Kosugi T; Hirano M; Alley MT; Bammer R; Pelc NJ; Namba H; Sakahara H
Neuroradiology; 2010 Oct; 52(10):913-20. PubMed ID: 19967532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-World Variability in the Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysm Wall Shear Stress: The 2015 International Aneurysm CFD Challenge.
Valen-Sendstad K; Bergersen AW; Shimogonya Y; Goubergrits L; Bruening J; Pallares J; Cito S; Piskin S; Pekkan K; Geers AJ; Larrabide I; Rapaka S; Mihalef V; Fu W; Qiao A; Jain K; Roller S; Mardal KA; Kamakoti R; Spirka T; Ashton N; Revell A; Aristokleous N; Houston JG; Tsuji M; Ishida F; Menon PG; Browne LD; Broderick S; Shojima M; Koizumi S; Barbour M; Aliseda A; Morales HG; Lefèvre T; Hodis S; Al-Smadi YM; Tran JS; Marsden AL; Vaippummadhom S; Einstein GA; Brown AG; Debus K; Niizuma K; Rashad S; Sugiyama SI; Owais Khan M; Updegrove AR; Shadden SC; Cornelissen BMW; Majoie CBLM; Berg P; Saalfield S; Kono K; Steinman DA
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):544-564. PubMed ID: 30203115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the influence of inlet boundary conditions on computational fluid dynamics for intracranial aneurysms: a virtual experiment.
Pereira VM; Brina O; Marcos Gonzales A; Narata AP; Bijlenga P; Schaller K; Lovblad KO; Ouared R
J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(9):1531-9. PubMed ID: 23602597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computational hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms: the effects of modeled versus measured boundary conditions.
Marzo A; Singh P; Larrabide I; Radaelli A; Coley S; Gwilliam M; Wilkinson ID; Lawford P; Reymond P; Patel U; Frangi A; Hose DR
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Feb; 39(2):884-96. PubMed ID: 20972626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo hemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms obtained by magnetic resonance fluid dynamics (MRFD) based on time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI.
Isoda H; Ohkura Y; Kosugi T; Hirano M; Takeda H; Hiramatsu H; Yamashita S; Takehara Y; Alley MT; Bammer R; Pelc NJ; Namba H; Sakahara H
Neuroradiology; 2010 Oct; 52(10):921-8. PubMed ID: 20012431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardized viscosity as a source of error in computational fluid dynamic simulations of cerebral aneurysms.
Fillingham P; Belur N; Sweem R; Barbour MC; Marsh LMM; Aliseda A; Levitt MR
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1499-1508. PubMed ID: 38150511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemodynamic and morphological characteristics of a growing cerebral aneurysm.
Dabagh M; Nair P; Gounley J; Frakes D; Gonzalez LF; Randles A
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Jul; 47(1):E13. PubMed ID: 31261117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Parent Artery Segmentation and Boundary Conditions on Hemodynamic Characteristics of Intracranial Aneurysms.
Hua Y; Oh JH; Kim YB
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Sep; 56(5):1328-37. PubMed ID: 26256976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra-aneurysmal flow patterns and wall shear stresses calculated with computational flow dynamics in an anterior communicating artery aneurysm depend on knowledge of patient-specific inflow rates.
Karmonik C; Yen C; Grossman RG; Klucznik R; Benndorf G
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2009 May; 151(5):479-85; discussion 485. PubMed ID: 19343271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Errors in power-law estimations of inflow rates for intracranial aneurysm CFD.
Chnafa C; Bouillot P; Brina O; Najafi M; Delattre BMA; Vargas MI; Pereira VM; Steinman DA
J Biomech; 2018 Oct; 80():159-165. PubMed ID: 30243498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inflow Hemodynamics of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comparison of Computational Fluid Dynamics and 4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Misaki K; Futami K; Uno T; Nambu I; Yoshikawa A; Kamide T; Nakada M
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021 May; 30(5):105685. PubMed ID: 33662703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: effects of parent artery segmentation on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics.
Castro MA; Putman CM; Cebral JR
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006 Sep; 27(8):1703-9. PubMed ID: 16971618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm.
van Ooij P; Potters WV; Guédon A; Schneiders JJ; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; vanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 23417769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
