345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32423382)
1. Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals.
Marušić MF; Fidahić M; Cepeha CM; Farcaș LG; Tseke A; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):121. PubMed ID: 32423382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use and reporting of risk of bias tools in 825 systematic reviews of acupuncture: a cross-sectional study.
Long Y; Wang X; Xiao W; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Huang J; Du L
Acupunct Med; 2021 Aug; 39(4):318-326. PubMed ID: 32811166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.
Liu Y; Yang S; Dai J; Xu Y; Zhang R; Jiang H; Yan X; Yang K
PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28130. PubMed ID: 22174772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How do systematic reviews of acupuncture for pain relief incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis? A methodological study.
Li XQ; Tao KM; Yang GL; Zhou QH; Ling CQ
Acupunct Med; 2016 Apr; 34(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 26526002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.
Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S
J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study.
Luo S; Long Y; Xiao W; Wang X; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Du L; Chen M
J Evid Based Med; 2020 Feb; 13(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 32112515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study.
Katikireddi SV; Egan M; Petticrew M
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2015 Feb; 69(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 25481532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in treating knee osteoarthritis: assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews with ROBIS tool.
Xing D; Wang B; Zhang W; Yang Z; Hou Y; Chen Y; Lin J
Int J Rheum Dis; 2017 Nov; 20(11):1658-1673. PubMed ID: 29044993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Overall bias methods and their use in sensitivity analysis of Cochrane reviews were not consistent.
Babic A; Vuka I; Saric F; Proloscic I; Slapnicar E; Cavar J; Poklepovic Pericic T; Pieper D; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 119():57-64. PubMed ID: 31734347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review.
Faggion CM; Listl S; Alarcón MA
J Clin Periodontol; 2015 May; 42(5):488-94. PubMed ID: 25809114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
Puljak L; Ramic I; Arriola Naharro C; Brezova J; Lin YC; Surdila AA; Tomajkova E; Farias Medeiros I; Nikolovska M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Barcot O; Suarez Salvado M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():114-119. PubMed ID: 32247026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals.
Martinez-Monedero R; Danielian A; Angajala V; Dinalo JE; Kezirian EJ
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Nov; 163(5):892-905. PubMed ID: 32450783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study.
Innocenti T; Feller D; Giagio S; Salvioli S; Minnucci S; Brindisino F; Cosentino C; Piano L; Chiarotto A; Ostelo R
Braz J Phys Ther; 2022; 26(5):100450. PubMed ID: 36270163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols.
Farrah K; Young K; Tunis MC; Zhao L
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):280. PubMed ID: 31730014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Appraisal of systematic reviews on the management of peri-implant diseases with two methodological tools.
Faggion CM; Monje A; Wasiak J
J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Jun; 45(6):754-766. PubMed ID: 29575189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence and methodological quality of systematic reviews in Korean medical journals.
Kim SJ; Han MA; Jung JH; Hwang EC; Kim HR; Yoon SE; Kim SH; Kim P; Kim SY
Epidemiol Health; 2023; 45():e2023017. PubMed ID: 36758961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
