These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3242367)

  • 1. [Use of Makler counting chamber in semen analysis].
    Tomoyoshi T; Ishida A; Kim CJ
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Nov; 34(11):1931-3. PubMed ID: 3242367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of Makler counting chamber and improved Neubauer hemocytometer in sperm concentration measurement.
    Sukcharoen N; Ngeamjirawat J; Chanprasit Y; Aribarg A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1994 Sep; 77(9):471-6. PubMed ID: 7706966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of four methods for sperm counting].
    Hu YA; Lu JC; Lu NQ; Shao Y; Huang YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Mar; 12(3):222-4, 227. PubMed ID: 16597036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrepancies in the determination of sperm concentration using Bürker-Türk, Thoma and Makler counting chambers.
    Christensen P; Stryhn H; Hansen C
    Theriogenology; 2005 Mar; 63(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 15710187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quality evaluation of 3 sperm counting chambers by computer-assisted sperm analysis system].
    Cai J; Zeng Y; Song C; Mo ML; Yin B; Lin Q; Huang J
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 15(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19452697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Quality evaluation of three different sperm counting chambers].
    Lu J; Lü N; Huang Y; Li PS; Fisch H
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2004 Oct; 10(10):755-7, 760. PubMed ID: 15562789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multicenter study evaluating the flowcytometric-based kit for semen analysis.
    Shai S; Roudebush W; Powers D; Dirnfeld M; Lamb DJ
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Apr; 83(4):1034-8. PubMed ID: 15820817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs MK; de Vliegher SP; Govaere JL; de Schauwer C; de Kruif A; van Soom A
    Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image cytometer method for automated assessment of human spermatozoa concentration.
    Egeberg DL; Kjaerulff S; Hansen C; Petersen JH; Glensbjerg M; Skakkebaek NE; Jørgensen N; Almstrup K
    Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):615-23. PubMed ID: 23606456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Advances in standardization and quality control for the analysis of sperm quality parameters].
    Huang YF; Lu JC
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2007 Nov; 13(11):963-8. PubMed ID: 18077904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated semen analysis shows an increase in sperm concentration and motility with time in Makler chambers having excess sample volume.
    Yanagida K; Hoshi K; Sato A; Burkman L
    Hum Reprod; 1990 Feb; 5(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 2324260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Capillary-loaded particle fluid dynamics: effect on estimation of sperm concentration.
    Douglas-Hamilton DH; Smith NG; Kuster CE; Vermeiden JP; Althouse GC
    J Androl; 2005; 26(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 15611575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A comparative study of the white cell pipette method and the Makler counting chamber method of counting spermatozoa].
    Menkveld R; Van Zyl JA; Stander FS; Conradie E; Kopper K
    S Afr Med J; 1980 Sep; 58(13):536-8. PubMed ID: 6893501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality assurance for sperm concentration using latex beads.
    Peters AJ; Zaneveld LJ; Jeyendran RS
    Fertil Steril; 1993 Oct; 60(4):702-5. PubMed ID: 8405529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The comparison of assessment of pigeon semen motility and sperm concentration by conventional methods and the CASA system (HTM IVOS).
    Klimowicz MD; Nizanski W; Batkowski F; Savic MA
    Theriogenology; 2008 Jul; 70(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18423566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of an initial azoospermic reading compared with results of post-centrifugation semen analysis after vasectomy.
    Steward B; Hays M; Sokal D
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2119-23. PubMed ID: 18804227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of a new disposable counting chamber.
    Coetzee K; Menkveld R
    Arch Androl; 2001; 47(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 11554687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrepancies in sperm count using improved Neubauer, Makler, and Horwells counting chambers.
    Imade GE; Towobola OA; Sagay AS; Otubu JA
    Arch Androl; 1993; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8373281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is flow cytometry really adapted to the determination of sperm concentration?
    Lu JC; Chen F; Xu HR; Wu YM; Xia XY; Huang YF; Lu NQ
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2007; 67(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 17558894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Delay in the application of the cover glass is a potential source of error with the Makler Counting Chamber.
    Matson P; Irving J; Zuvela E; Hughes R
    Fertil Steril; 1999 Sep; 72(3):559-61. PubMed ID: 10519637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.