210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32424724)
1. Refining Value Sensitive Design: A (Capability-Based) Procedural Ethics Approach to Technological Design for Well-Being.
Cenci A; Cawthorne D
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Oct; 26(5):2629-2662. PubMed ID: 32424724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Possibilities of consensus: toward democratic moral discourse.
Jennings B
J Med Philos; 1991 Aug; 16(4):447-63. PubMed ID: 1895027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaginative Value Sensitive Design: Using Moral Imagination Theory to Inform Responsible Technology Design.
Umbrello S
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):575-595. PubMed ID: 30972629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What values in design? The challenge of incorporating moral values into design.
Manders-Huits N
Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Jun; 17(2):271-87. PubMed ID: 20224927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomedical enhancements as justice.
Nam J
Bioethics; 2015 Feb; 29(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 24117708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bioethics and democracy.
Jennings B
Centen Rev; 1990; 34(2):207-25. PubMed ID: 11659490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Health and the good life: contributions by Amartya Sen's capability approach to ethical reasoning in public health].
Restrepo-Ochoa DA
Cad Saude Publica; 2013 Dec; 29(12):2371-82. PubMed ID: 24356684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reflections on Putting AI Ethics into Practice: How Three AI Ethics Approaches Conceptualize Theory and Practice.
Bleher H; Braun M
Sci Eng Ethics; 2023 May; 29(3):21. PubMed ID: 37237246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A theory of international bioethics: multiculturalism, postmodernism, and the bankruptcy of fundamentalism.
Baker R
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1998 Sep; 8(3):201-31. PubMed ID: 11656932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bioethics and law: a developmental perspective.
van der Burg W
Bioethics; 1997 Apr; 11(2):91-114. PubMed ID: 11654795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Moral traditions, ethical language, and reproductive technologies.
Cahill LS
J Med Philos; 1989 Oct; 14(5):497-522. PubMed ID: 2691613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A theory of international bioethics: the negotiable and the non-negotiable.
Baker R
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1998 Sep; 8(3):233-73. PubMed ID: 11656933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Religion and moral meaning in bioethics.
Campbell CS
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):S4-10. PubMed ID: 11656005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethics in technological culture: a programmatic proposal for a pragmatist approach.
Keulartz J; Schermer M; Korthals M; Swierstra T
Sci Technol Human Values; 2004; 29(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 16013108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Germ-line engineering, freedom, and future generations.
Cooke EF
Bioethics; 2003 Feb; 17(1):32-58. PubMed ID: 12718332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The hyperreality of clinical ethics: a unitary theory and hermeneutics.
Ten Have H
Theor Med; 1994 Jun; 15(2):113-31. PubMed ID: 7997968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical pragmatism: John Dewey and clinical ethics.
Miller FG; Fins JJ; Bacchetta MD
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 13(1):27-51. PubMed ID: 9068236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion, ethics, and the common good: Who are we? What do we want? How do we get there?
Araujo RJ
Marquette Law Rev; 1993; 76():701-54. PubMed ID: 11659963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Impartial principle and moral context: securing a place for the particular in ethical theory.
Carse AL
J Med Philos; 1998 Apr; 23(2):153-69. PubMed ID: 9638567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Common morality as an alternative to principlism.
Clouser KD
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Sep; 5(3):219-36. PubMed ID: 11645307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
