These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32424987)

  • 1. A Bayesian approach to assessing small-study effects in meta-analysis of a binary outcome with controlled false positive rate.
    Shi L; Chu H; Lin L
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jul; 11(4):535-552. PubMed ID: 32424987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    JAMA; 2006 Feb; 295(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 16467236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does under-reporting of negative and inconclusive results affect the false-positive rate in meta-analysis? A simulation study.
    Kicinski M
    BMJ Open; 2014 Aug; 4(8):e004831. PubMed ID: 25168036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Funnel plots may show asymmetry in the absence of publication bias with continuous outcomes dependent on baseline risk: presentation of a new publication bias test.
    Doleman B; Freeman SC; Lund JN; Williams JP; Sutton AJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jul; 11(4):522-534. PubMed ID: 32362052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
    Furuya-Kanamori L; Barendregt JJ; Doi SAR
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2018 Dec; 16(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 29621038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Graphical augmentations to sample-size-based funnel plot in meta-analysis.
    Lin L
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):376-388. PubMed ID: 30664834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias?
    Saveleva E; Selinski S
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting small-study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis of survival data: A comparison of new and existing tests.
    Debray TPA; Moons KGM; Riley RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28975717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. LFK index does not reliably detect small-study effects in meta-analysis: A simulation study.
    Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Semaca C
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jul; 15(4):603-615. PubMed ID: 38467140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences.
    Pustejovsky JE; Rodgers MA
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 30506832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. THE EFFECT DIRECTION SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN ASSESSING SMALL-STUDY EFFECTS.
    Meng Z; Wu C; Lin L
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2023 Mar; 23(1):101830. PubMed ID: 36914304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication bias & small-study effects in pediatric dentistry meta-analyses.
    Papageorgiou SN; Dimitraki D; Coolidge T; Kotsanos N
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2015 Mar; 15(1):8-24. PubMed ID: 25666576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints.
    Harbord RM; Egger M; Sterne JA
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3443-57. PubMed ID: 16345038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.
    Sterne JA; Gavaghan D; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1119-29. PubMed ID: 11106885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Lin L; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):785-794. PubMed ID: 29141096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic evaluation and comparison of statistical tests for publication bias.
    Hayashino Y; Noguchi Y; Fukui T
    J Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 15(6):235-43. PubMed ID: 16276033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study.
    Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Ades AE; Stanley TD; Abrams KR; Peters JL; Cooper NJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jan; 9():2. PubMed ID: 19138428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a meta-epidemiological study.
    van Enst WA; Ochodo E; Scholten RJ; Hooft L; Leeflang MM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 May; 14():70. PubMed ID: 24884381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed.
    Deeks JJ; Macaskill P; Irwig L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):882-93. PubMed ID: 16085191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods for addressing publication bias in school psychology journals: A descriptive review of meta-analyses from 1980 to 2019.
    McClain MB; Callan GL; Harris B; Floyd RG; Haverkamp CR; Golson ME; Longhurst DN; Benallie KJ
    J Sch Psychol; 2021 Feb; 84():74-94. PubMed ID: 33581772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.