These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32425135)

  • 1. Efficient Adaptive Speech Reception Threshold Measurements Using Stochastic Approximation Algorithms.
    Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216520919199. PubMed ID: 32425135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation into the applicability and optimization of the Dutch matrix sentence test for use with cochlear implant users.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Nov; 53(11):817-28. PubMed ID: 24975235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptation of scoring methods for testing cochlear implant users using the Cantonese Hearing In Noise Test (CHINT).
    Wong LL; Keung SK
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 23632972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing speech recognition abilities with digits in noise in cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Kaandorp MW; Smits C; Merkus P; Goverts ST; Festen JM
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 25156097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Baumgärtel RM; Hu H; Krawczyk-Becker M; Marquardt D; Herzke T; Coleman G; Adiloğlu K; Bomke K; Plotz K; Gerkmann T; Doclo S; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relation of hearing-specific patient-reported outcome measures with speech perception measures and acceptable noise levels in cochlear implant users.
    Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jun; 59(6):416-426. PubMed ID: 32091274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech Intelligibility and Spatial Release From Masking Improvements Using Spatial Noise Reduction Algorithms in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Zedan A; Jürgens T; Williges B; Kollmeier B; Wiebe K; Galindo J; Wesarg T
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211005931. PubMed ID: 33926327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time-compression thresholds for Mandarin sentences in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Meng Q; Wang X; Cai Y; Kong F; Buck AN; Yu G; Zheng N; Schnupp JWH
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 374():58-68. PubMed ID: 30732921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spectral contrast enhancement improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implants.
    Nogueira W; Rode T; Büchner A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):728-39. PubMed ID: 26936556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Important Role of Contextual Information in Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users and Its Consequences in Speech Tests.
    Dingemanse JG; Goedegebure A
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519838672. PubMed ID: 30991904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.
    Hey M; Hocke T; Hedderich J; Müller-Deile J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):895-902. PubMed ID: 25140602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ideal time-frequency masking algorithms lead to different speech intelligibility and quality in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Koning R; Madhu N; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):331-41. PubMed ID: 25167542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.
    Ji C; Galvin JJ; Chang YP; Xu A; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):532-54. PubMed ID: 24686901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics and international comparability of the Finnish matrix sentence test in cochlear implant recipients.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Sivonen V; Willberg T; Aarnisalo AA; Lenarz T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():80-7. PubMed ID: 26364512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech: Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners.
    Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 17(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 27090115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
    Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m).
    Jansen S; Koning R; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24152309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.