235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32425268)
21. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Aliyev S; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 32788262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy.
Chacon E; Manzour N; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Núñez-Córdoba JM; Martin-Calvo N; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Shamistan A; Gil Moreno A; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Boria F; Alcazar JL; Chiva L; ;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Feb; 32(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 35039455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Class II versus Class III radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: an observational study in a tertiary center.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Ramondino S; Vullo SL; Carcangiu M; Haeusler E; Mariani L; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):883-90. PubMed ID: 24613739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China.
Hu TWY; Huang Y; Li N; Nie D; Li Z
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32571892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Minimal-invasive or open approach for surgery of early cervical cancer: the treatment center matters.
Gennari P; Gerken M; Mészáros J; Klinkhammer-Schalke M; Ortmann O; Eggemann H; Ignatov A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Aug; 304(2):503-510. PubMed ID: 33483846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer treated with open versus robotic radical hysterectomy: Our surgical pathology interrogation.
Yang J; Mead-Harvey C; Polen-De C; Magtibay P; Butler K; Cliby W; Langstraat C; Dinh T; Chen L; Magrina J
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 159(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 32893029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC cervical cancer patients triaged to primary treatment by radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.
Aslan K; Meydanli MM; Oz M; Tohma YA; Haberal A; Ayhan A
J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):e1. PubMed ID: 31788991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Smith AJB; Jones TN; Miao D; Fader AN
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):544-555.e7. PubMed ID: 33359291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal surgery in stage Ⅰa1 （LVSI
Chen CL; Kang S; Chen BL; Yang Y; Guo JX; Hao M; Wang WL; Ji M; Sun LX; Wang L; Liang WT; Wang SG; Li WL; Fan HJ; Liu P; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):589-599. PubMed ID: 32957747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?
Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Trends in Use and Survival Associated With Fertility-Sparing Trachelectomy for Young Women With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Cui RR; Chen L; Tergas AI; Hou JY; St Clair CM; Neugut AI; Ananth CV; Hershman DL; Wright JD
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 131(6):1085-1094. PubMed ID: 29742670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: oncologic outcomes based on tumor diameter.
He J; Hao M; Liu P; Liu Z; Lang J; Bin X; Chen C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 32699022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of long-term survival of total abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: Korean multicenter, retrospective analysis.
Kwon BS; Roh HJ; Lee S; Yang J; Song YJ; Lee SH; Kim KH; Suh DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):642-648. PubMed ID: 33041070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Trachelectomy for reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy.
Matsuo K; Chen L; Mandelbaum RS; Melamed A; Roman LD; Wright JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):469.e1-469.e13. PubMed ID: 30802438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Effects of colpotomic approaches on prognosis and recurrence sites of stage Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2 cervical cancer after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy].
Zhou D; Li YD; Ling KJ; Wang RW; Wang YZ; Tang S; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jan; 58(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 36720615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
