These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32425971)

  • 1. Controlling Coancestry and Thereby Future Inbreeding by Optimum-Contribution Selection Using Alternative Genomic-Relationship Matrices.
    Gebregiwergis GT; Sørensen AC; Henryon M; Meuwissen T
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():345. PubMed ID: 32425971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pedigree relationships to control inbreeding in optimum-contribution selection realise more genetic gain than genomic relationships.
    Henryon M; Liu H; Berg P; Su G; Nielsen HM; Gebregiwergis GT; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jul; 51(1):39. PubMed ID: 31286868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of genomic coancestry matrices in the optimisation of contributions to maintain genetic diversity at specific regions of the genome.
    Gómez-Romano F; Villanueva B; Fernández J; Woolliams JA; Pong-Wong R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():2. PubMed ID: 26763889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Restricting coancestry and inbreeding at a specific position on the genome by using optimized selection.
    Roughsedge T; Pong-Wong R; Woolliams JA; Villanueva B
    Genet Res (Camb); 2008 Apr; 90(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 18426623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artificial selection with traditional or genomic relationships: consequences in coancestry and genetic diversity.
    Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; García-Cortés LA; de Cara MÁ
    Front Genet; 2015; 6():127. PubMed ID: 25904933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic mating as sustainable breeding for Chinese indigenous Ningxiang pigs.
    He J; Wu XL; Zeng Q; Li H; Ma H; Jiang J; Rosa GJM; Gianola D; Tait RG; Bauck S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236629. PubMed ID: 32797113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain.
    Liu H; Henryon M; Sørensen AC
    Animal; 2017 Apr; 11(4):547-555. PubMed ID: 27531662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic selection for survival under naturally occurring Saprolegnia oomycete infection in farmed European whitefish Coregonus lavaretus.
    Calboli FCF; Iso-Touru T; Bitz O; Fischer D; Nousiainen A; Koskinen H; Tapio M; Tapio I; Kause A
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37777972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding.
    Sonesson AK; Woolliams JA; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Aug; 44(1):27. PubMed ID: 22898324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre-selection against a lethal recessive allele in breeding schemes with optimum-contribution selection or truncation selection.
    Hjortø L; Henryon M; Liu H; Berg P; Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Sep; 53(1):75. PubMed ID: 34551728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of kinship matrices on genetic gain and inbreeding with optimum contribution selection in a genomic dairy cattle breeding program.
    Gautason E; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jul; 55(1):48. PubMed ID: 37460999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic selection using regularized linear regression models: ridge regression, lasso, elastic net and their extensions.
    Ogutu JO; Schulz-Streeck T; Piepho HP
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S10. PubMed ID: 22640436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of QTL minor allele frequency on genomic evaluation using real genotype data and simulated phenotypes in Japanese Black cattle.
    Uemoto Y; Sasaki S; Kojima T; Sugimoto Y; Watanabe T
    BMC Genet; 2015 Nov; 16():134. PubMed ID: 26586567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term selection strategies for complex traits using high-density genetic markers.
    Kemper KE; Bowman PJ; Pryce JE; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4646-56. PubMed ID: 22818479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Most of the benefits from genomic selection can be realized by genotyping a small proportion of available selection candidates.
    Henryon M; Berg P; Ostersen T; Nielsen B; Sørensen AC
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4681-9. PubMed ID: 23087087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.
    Hayes BJ; Visscher PM; Goddard ME
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Feb; 91(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 19220931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
    Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.