BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32427071)

  • 1. Rhythm Violation Enhances Auditory-Evoked Responses to the Extent of Overriding Sensory Adaptation in Passive Listening.
    Menceloglu M; Grabowecky M; Suzuki S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Sep; 32(9):1654-1671. PubMed ID: 32427071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of intensity accents on the detection of interonset interval variations.
    Lai Y; Yao D
    Neuroreport; 2011 Oct; 22(15):749-52. PubMed ID: 21876466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prior expectation mediates neural adaptation to repeated sounds in the auditory cortex: an MEG study.
    Todorovic A; van Ede F; Maris E; de Lange FP
    J Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 31(25):9118-23. PubMed ID: 21697363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The spatio-temporal dynamics of deviance and target detection in the passive and active auditory oddball paradigm: a sLORETA study.
    Justen C; Herbert C
    BMC Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 19(1):25. PubMed ID: 29673322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The brain tracks auditory rhythm predictability independent of selective attention.
    Foldal MD; Blenkmann AO; Llorens A; Knight RT; Solbakk AK; Endestad T
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):7975. PubMed ID: 32409738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What we expect is not always what we get: evidence for both the direction-of-change and the specific-stimulus hypotheses of auditory attentional capture.
    Nöstl A; Marsh JE; Sörqvist P
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111997. PubMed ID: 25393298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attenuation of auditory N2 for self-modulated tones during continuous actions.
    Sugimoto F; Kimura M; Takeda Y
    Biol Psychol; 2021 Nov; 166():108201. PubMed ID: 34653547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responses of human auditory association cortex to the omission of an expected acoustic event.
    Hughes HC; Darcey TM; Barkan HI; Williamson PD; Roberts DW; Aslin CH
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jun; 13(6 Pt 1):1073-89. PubMed ID: 11352613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intermodal selective attention. I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli.
    Woods DL; Alho K; Algazi A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 May; 82(5):341-55. PubMed ID: 1374703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When temporal prediction errs: ERP responses to delayed action-feedback onset.
    Pinheiro AP; Schwartze M; Gutierrez F; Kotz SA
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Nov; 134():107200. PubMed ID: 31557484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Studies in auditory timing: 1. Simple patterns.
    Hirsh IJ; Monahan CB; Grant KW; Singh PG
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 2326145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. N1-P2: Neural markers of temporal expectation and response discrimination in interval timing.
    Duzcu H; Özkurt TE; Mapelli I; Hohenberger A
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2019; 79(2):193-204. PubMed ID: 31342955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory cortical response patterns to multiple rhythms of AM sound.
    Draganova R; Ross B; Borgmann C; Pantev C
    Ear Hear; 2002 Jun; 23(3):254-65. PubMed ID: 12072617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactions between "what" and "when" in the auditory system: temporal predictability enhances repetition suppression.
    Costa-Faidella J; Baldeweg T; Grimm S; Escera C
    J Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 31(50):18590-7. PubMed ID: 22171057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual organization of auditory streaming-task relies on neural entrainment of the stimulus-presentation rate: MEG evidence.
    Chakalov I; Draganova R; Wollbrink A; Preissl H; Pantev C
    BMC Neurosci; 2013 Oct; 14():120. PubMed ID: 24119225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones.
    Woldorff MG; Hillyard SA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Sep; 79(3):170-91. PubMed ID: 1714809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modifying temporal expectations: Changing cortical responsivity to delayed self-initiated sensations with training.
    Elijah RB; Le Pelley ME; Whitford TJ
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Oct; 120():88-95. PubMed ID: 27628506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictability of higher-order temporal structure of musical stimuli is associated with auditory evoked response.
    Dauer T; Nerness B; Fujioka T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jul; 153():53-64. PubMed ID: 32325078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subjectively preferred octave size is resolved at the late stages of cerebral auditory processing.
    Jaatinen J; Väntänen J; Salmela V; Alho K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Oct; 58(7):3686-3704. PubMed ID: 37752605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.