These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32427491)

  • 1. RNAPosers: Machine Learning Classifiers for Ribonucleic Acid-Ligand Poses.
    Chhabra S; Xie J; Frank AT
    J Phys Chem B; 2020 Jun; 124(22):4436-4445. PubMed ID: 32427491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DeepBSP-a Machine Learning Method for Accurate Prediction of Protein-Ligand Docking Structures.
    Bao J; He X; Zhang JZH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 May; 61(5):2231-2240. PubMed ID: 33979150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of cross-docked poses on performance of machine learning classifier for protein-ligand binding pose prediction.
    Shen C; Hu X; Gao J; Zhang X; Zhong H; Wang Z; Xu L; Kang Y; Cao D; Hou T
    J Cheminform; 2021 Oct; 13(1):81. PubMed ID: 34656169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SCORCH: Improving structure-based virtual screening with machine learning classifiers, data augmentation, and uncertainty estimation.
    McGibbon M; Money-Kyrle S; Blay V; Houston DR
    J Adv Res; 2023 Apr; 46():135-147. PubMed ID: 35901959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RmsdXNA: RMSD prediction of nucleic acid-ligand docking poses using machine-learning method.
    Tan LH; Kwoh CK; Mu Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 Mar; 25(3):. PubMed ID: 38695120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ViTScore: A Novel Three-Dimensional Vision Transformer Method for Accurate Prediction of Protein-Ligand Docking Poses.
    Guo L; Qiu T; Wang J
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2023 Oct; 22(4):734-743. PubMed ID: 37159314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning from Docked Ligands: Ligand-Based Features Rescue Structure-Based Scoring Functions When Trained on Docked Poses.
    Boyles F; Deane CM; Morris GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5329-5341. PubMed ID: 34469150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Machine-learning scoring functions for identifying native poses of ligands docked to known and novel proteins.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S3. PubMed ID: 25916860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Machine learning optimization of cross docking accuracy.
    Bjerrum EJ
    Comput Biol Chem; 2016 Jun; 62():133-44. PubMed ID: 27179709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Docking and Scoring with Target-Specific Pose Classifier Succeeds in Native-Like Pose Identification But Not Binding Affinity Prediction in the CSAR 2014 Benchmark Exercise.
    Politi R; Convertino M; Popov K; Dokholyan NV; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1032-41. PubMed ID: 27050767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Target-specific native/decoy pose classifier improves the accuracy of ligand ranking in the CSAR 2013 benchmark.
    Fourches D; Politi R; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jan; 55(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 25521713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. LCP: Simple Representation of Docking Poses for Machine Learning: A Case Study on Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitors.
    Kawai K; Asanuma Y; Kato T; Karuo Y; Tarui A; Sato K; Omote M
    Mol Inform; 2022 May; 41(5):e2100245. PubMed ID: 34843171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Overview of Scoring Functions Used for Protein-Ligand Interactions in Molecular Docking.
    Li J; Fu A; Zhang L
    Interdiscip Sci; 2019 Jun; 11(2):320-328. PubMed ID: 30877639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data Mining Meets Machine Learning: A Novel ANN-based Multi-body Interaction Docking Scoring Function (MBI-score) Based on Utilizing Frequent Geometric and Chemical Patterns of Interfacial Atoms in Native Protein-ligand Complexes.
    Khashan R; Tropsha A; Zheng W
    Mol Inform; 2022 Aug; 41(8):e2100248. PubMed ID: 35142086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A D3R prospective evaluation of machine learning for protein-ligand scoring.
    Sunseri J; Ragoza M; Collins J; Koes DR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):761-771. PubMed ID: 27592011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.