253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32428026)
1. Presence of problematic and disordered gambling in older age and validation of the South Oaks Gambling Scale.
Granero R; Jiménez-Murcia S; Fernández-Aranda F; Del Pino-Gutiérrez A; Mena-Moreno T; Mestre-Bach G; Gómez-Peña M; Moragas L; Aymamí N; Giroux I; Grall-Bronnec M; Sauvaget A; Codina E; Vintró-Alcaraz C; Lozano-Madrid M; Camozzi M; Agüera Z; Sánchez-González J; Casalé-Salayet G; Sánchez I; López-González H; Valenciano-Mendoza E; Mora B; Baenas I; Menchón JM
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233222. PubMed ID: 32428026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
Stinchfield R
Addict Behav; 2002; 27(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11800216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a Brazilian sample.
de Oliveira MP; da Silveira DX; de Carvalho SV; Collakis ST; Bizeto J; Silva MT
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Dec; 25(4):557-68. PubMed ID: 19774450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)].
Kido M; Shimazaki T
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Feb; 77(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 17447464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The performance of two pathological gambling screens in college students.
Weinstock J; Whelan JP; Meyers AW; McCausland C
Assessment; 2007 Dec; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 17986657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of Instruments Measuring At-Risk and Problem Gambling Among Young Individuals: A Systematic Review Covering Years 2009-2015.
Edgren R; Castrén S; Mäkelä M; Pörtfors P; Alho H; Salonen AH
J Adolesc Health; 2016 Jun; 58(6):600-15. PubMed ID: 27151759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties.
Raylu N; Oei TP
Addiction; 2004 Jun; 99(6):757-69. PubMed ID: 15139874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using a Rasch model to examine the utility of the South Oaks Gambling Screen across clinical and community samples.
Strong DR; Lesieur HR; Breen RB; Stinchfield R; Lejuez CW
Addict Behav; 2004 May; 29(3):465-81. PubMed ID: 15050667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and Validity of Three Instruments (DSM-IV, CPGI, and PPGM) in the Assessment of Problem Gambling in South Korea.
Back KJ; Williams RJ; Lee CK
J Gambl Stud; 2015 Sep; 31(3):775-86. PubMed ID: 24420959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An assessment of the psychometric properties of Lithuanian versions of DSM-IV-MR-J and SOGS-RA.
Skokauskas N; Burba B; Freedman D
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Jun; 25(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 19241149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Problem and probable pathological gambling among older adults assessed by the SOGS-R.
Wiebe JM; Cox BJ
J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(2):205-21. PubMed ID: 15870987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Victorian Gambling Screen: reliability and validation in a clinical population.
Tolchard B; Battersby MW
J Gambl Stud; 2010 Dec; 26(4):623-38. PubMed ID: 20035440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The South Oaks Gambling Screen-revised Adolescent (SOGS-RA) revisited: a cut-point analysis.
Boudreau B; Poulin C
J Gambl Stud; 2007 Sep; 23(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 17180721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the problem gambling severity index.
Holtgraves T
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Mar; 25(1):105-20. PubMed ID: 18704661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dimensions of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in Finland: A cross-sectional population study.
Salonen AH; Rosenström T; Edgren R; Volberg R; Alho H; Castrén S
Scand J Psychol; 2017 Jun; 58(3):228-237. PubMed ID: 28247931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the South Oaks Gambling Screen with DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria: results from a diverse community sample of gamblers.
Goodie AS; MacKillop J; Miller JD; Fortune EE; Maples J; Lance CE; Campbell WK
Assessment; 2013 Oct; 20(5):523-31. PubMed ID: 23946283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using the NORC DSM Screen for Gambling Problems as an outcome measure for pathological gambling: psychometric evaluation.
Hodgins DC
Addict Behav; 2004 Nov; 29(8):1685-90. PubMed ID: 15451138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of a Spanish translation of a measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling.
Jiménez-Murcia S; Stinchfield R; Alvarez-Moya E; Jaurrieta N; Bueno B; Granero R; Aymamí MN; Gómez-Peña M; Martínez-Giménez R; Fernández-Aranda F; Vallejo J
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Mar; 25(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 18592357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Gambling Disorder Screening Questionnaire, a self-administered diagnostic questionnaire for gambling disorder based on the DSM-5 criteria.
Villella C; Pascucci M; de Waure C; Bellomo A; Conte G
Riv Psichiatr; 2016; 51(5):206-211. PubMed ID: 27869907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
