These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32428206)

  • 1. In silico validation of pooled genotyping strategies for genomic evaluation in Angus cattle.
    Alexandre PA; Reverter A; Lehnert SA; Porto-Neto LR; Dominik S
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pooled genotyping strategies for the rapid construction of genomic reference populations1.
    Alexandre PA; Porto-Neto LR; Karaman E; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Dec; 97(12):4761-4769. PubMed ID: 31710679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework.
    Baller JL; Kachman SD; Kuehn LA; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32497209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of clustering methods for cross-validation, choice of phenotypes, and genotyping strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictions.
    Baller JL; Howard JT; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1534-1549. PubMed ID: 30721970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias, dispersion, and accuracy of genomic predictions for feedlot and carcase traits in Australian Angus steers.
    Alexandre PA; Li Y; Hine BC; Duff CJ; Ingham AB; Porto-Neto LR; Reverter A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Sep; 53(1):77. PubMed ID: 34565347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of Igenity genomically estimated breeding values for predicting Australian Angus BREEDPLAN traits.
    Boerner V; Johnston D; Wu XL; Bauck S
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Feb; 93(2):513-21. PubMed ID: 25549982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
    Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values from pure-breed and across-breed predictions in Australian beef cattle.
    Boerner V; Johnston DJ; Tier B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):61. PubMed ID: 25927468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic selection for the improvement of meat quality in beef.
    Pimentel EC; König S
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3418-26. PubMed ID: 22665643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic evaluation of Brown Swiss dairy cattle with limited national genotype data and integrated external information.
    Luštrek B; Vandenplas J; Gorjanc G; Potočnik K
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5738-5754. PubMed ID: 33685705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in genomic predictions when new information is added.
    Hidalgo J; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Masuda Y; Miller S; Bermann M; Garcia ALS; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Feb; 99(2):. PubMed ID: 33544869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of GEBV of sires based on pooled allele frequency of their progeny.
    Vargas Jurado N; Kuehn LA; Keele JW; Lewis RM
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 34510188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple Country and Breed Genomic Prediction of Tick Resistance in Beef Cattle.
    Cardoso FF; Matika O; Djikeng A; Mapholi N; Burrow HM; Yokoo MJI; Campos GS; Gulias-Gomes CC; Riggio V; Pong-Wong R; Engle B; Porto-Neto L; Maiwashe A; Hayes BJ
    Front Immunol; 2021; 12():620847. PubMed ID: 34248929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of genomic evaluation to dairy cattle in New Zealand.
    Winkelman AM; Johnson DL; Harris BL
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jan; 98(1):659-75. PubMed ID: 25468702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-breed genomic evaluation for tropical beef cattle when no pedigree information is available.
    Hayes BJ; Copley J; Dodd E; Ross EM; Speight S; Fordyce G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Oct; 55(1):71. PubMed ID: 37845626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of overlapping DNA pools to discern genetic differences despite pooling error.
    Keele JW; McDaneld TG; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37227930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of selection for ultrasound intramuscular fat percentage in Angus bulls on carcass traits of progeny.
    Sapp RL; Bertrand JK; Pringle TD; Wilson DE
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Aug; 80(8):2017-22. PubMed ID: 12211367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.