143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32428648)
1. Hickman Central Venous Catheters in Children: Open Versus Percutaneous Technique.
Bawazir OA; Altokhais TI
Ann Vasc Surg; 2020 Oct; 68():209-216. PubMed ID: 32428648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Replacement Versus Same-Site Salvage Using Hickman Catheter for Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: A Comparative Study.
Bawazir OA; Binyahib SM; Bawazir R; Bawazir A
Ann Vasc Surg; 2021 Oct; 76():443-448. PubMed ID: 33905847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tunnelled central venous access devices in small children: A comparison of open vs. ultrasound-guided percutaneous insertion in children weighing ten kilograms or less.
Vierboom L; Darani A; Langusch C; Soundappan S; Karpelowsky J
J Pediatr Surg; 2018 Sep; 53(9):1832-1838. PubMed ID: 29706443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Open tunneled central line insertion in children - External or internal jugular vein?
Alshafei A; Tareen F; Maphango N; White D; O'Connor B; Sriparan T
J Pediatr Surg; 2018 Nov; 53(11):2318-2321. PubMed ID: 30054059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A review of 5434 percutaneous pediatric central venous catheters inserted by anesthesiologists.
Malbezin S; Gauss T; Smith I; Bruneau B; Mangalsuren N; Diallo T; Skhiri A; Nivoche Y; Dahmani S; Brasher C
Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Nov; 23(11):974-9. PubMed ID: 23659462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The changing profile of safe techniques for the insertion of a central venous catheter in pediatric patients - improvement in the outcome with the experiences of 500 insertions in a single institution.
Kaji T; Kawano T; Yamada W; Yamada K; Onishi S; Nakame K; Mukai M; Ieiri S; Takamatsu H
J Pediatr Surg; 2016 Dec; 51(12):2044-2047. PubMed ID: 27829522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tunneled central venous catheters in children with malignant and chronic diseases: A comparison of open vs. percutaneous implantation.
Blum LV; Abdel-Rahman U; Klingebiel T; Fiegel H; Gfroerer S; Rolle U
J Pediatr Surg; 2017 May; 52(5):810-812. PubMed ID: 28188038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and clinical outcome of the port-a-cath in children: a tertiary care-center experience.
Bawazir O; Banoon E
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jun; 18(1):134. PubMed ID: 32560722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome of landmark-guided percutaneously inserted tunneled central venous catheters in infants and children under 3 years with cancer.
Martynov I; Raedecke J; Klima-Frysch J; Kluwe W; Schoenberger J
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2018 Oct; 65(10):e27295. PubMed ID: 29943891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of subcutaneous tunneling for prevention of bacterial colonization of femoral central venous catheters in critically ill children.
Nahum E; Levy I; Katz J; Samra Z; Ashkenazi S; Ben-Ari J; Schonfeld T; Dagan O
Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2002 Nov; 21(11):1000-4. PubMed ID: 12442019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hemodialysis Catheters in Infants: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.
Ma GMY; Ventura LM; Amiribadi A; Gnannt R; Nemec R; Noone D; Licht C; Amaral J; Temple M; Muthasami P; Parra D; Chamlati R; Connolly B
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2020 May; 31(5):778-786. PubMed ID: 32305244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peripherally inserted central catheters in the treatment of children with cancer: Results of a multicenter study.
Rykov MY; Zaborovskij SV; Shvecov AN; Shukin VV
J Vasc Access; 2018 Jul; 19(4):378-381. PubMed ID: 29546772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access.
Raad I; Davis S; Becker M; Hohn D; Houston D; Umphrey J; Bodey GP
Arch Intern Med; 1993 Aug; 153(15):1791-6. PubMed ID: 8392831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Open Versus Ultrasound Guided Tunneled Central Venous Access in children: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Soundappan SSV; Lam L; Cass DT; Karpelowsky J
J Surg Res; 2021 Apr; 260():284-292. PubMed ID: 33360753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. External jugular vein cross-over as a new technique for percutaneous central venous port access in case of left central venous occlusion.
Marcy PY; El Hajjam M; Lacout A; Nöel C; Simon JJ; Figl A
J Vasc Access; 2013; 14(4):388-91. PubMed ID: 23817955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. IR Approaches to Difficult Removals of Totally Implanted Venous Access Port Catheters in Children: A Single-Center Experience.
Patel PA; Parra DA; Bath R; Amaral JG; Temple MJ; John PR; Connolly BL
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):876-81. PubMed ID: 27106735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Traditional Long-Term Central Venous Catheters Versus Transhepatic Venous Catheters in Infants and Young Children.
Marshall AM; Danford DA; Curzon CL; Anderson V; Delaney JW
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2017 Oct; 18(10):944-948. PubMed ID: 28746169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patency of neck veins following ultrasound-guided percutaneous Hickman line insertion.
Wragg RC; Blundell S; Bader M; Sharif B; Bennett J; Jester I; Bromley P; Arul GS
Pediatr Surg Int; 2014 Mar; 30(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 24072203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial.
Biffi R; Orsi F; Pozzi S; Pace U; Bonomo G; Monfardini L; Della Vigna P; Rotmensz N; Radice D; Zampino MG; Fazio N; de Braud F; Andreoni B; Goldhirsch A
Ann Oncol; 2009 May; 20(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 19179550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percutaneous infraclavicular insertion of long-term central venous Hickman catheters.
Hughes CJ; Ramsey-Stewart G; Storey DW
Aust N Z J Surg; 1989 Nov; 59(11):889-93. PubMed ID: 2818350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
