These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Inbreeding depression and male-mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Miller PS; Glasner J; Hedrick PW Genetica; 1993; 88(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 8375666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Inbreeding depresses sperm competitiveness, but not fertilization or mating success in male Tribolium castaneum. Michalczyk L; Martin OY; Millard AL; Emerson BC; Gage MJ Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Nov; 277(1699):3483-91. PubMed ID: 20554548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effect of inbreeding and heritability of sperm competition success in the bulb mite Rhizoglyphus robini. Konior M; Keller L; Radwan J Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Jun; 94(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 15742000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox. Neff BD; Pitcher TE J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 18589454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Inbreeding depression in an insect with maternal care: influences of family interactions, life stage and offspring sex. Meunier J; Kölliker M J Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 26(10):2209-20. PubMed ID: 23981229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Double decomposition: decomposing the variance in subcomponents of male extra-pair reproductive success. Losdat S; Arcese P; Reid JM J Anim Ecol; 2015 Sep; 84(5):1384-95. PubMed ID: 25976301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Limited effects of inbreeding on breeding coloration. Bererhi B; Lindsay WR; Schwartz TS; Wapstra E; Olsson M J Hered; 2023 Apr; 114(2):143-151. PubMed ID: 36715308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Meiotic drive changes sperm precedence patterns in house mice: potential for male alternative mating tactics? Sutter A; Lindholm AK BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Jun; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 27328665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. No evidence of inbreeding avoidance despite demonstrated survival costs in a polygynous rodent. Olson LE; Blumstein DT; Pollinger JR; Wayne RK Mol Ecol; 2012 Feb; 21(3):562-71. PubMed ID: 22145620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Inbreeding reveals mode of past selection on male reproductive characters in Drosophila melanogaster. Ala-Honkola O; Hosken DJ; Manier MK; Lüpold S; Droge-Young EM; Berben KS; Collins WF; Belote JM; Pitnick S Ecol Evol; 2013 Jul; 3(7):2089-102. PubMed ID: 23919154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Males from populations with higher competitive mating success produce sons with lower fitness. Nguyen TTX; Moehring AJ J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):528-534. PubMed ID: 30811733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection increase offspring quality but impose survival costs to female field crickets. Matzke M; Rossi A; Tuni C J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):296-308. PubMed ID: 36484616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Sex-specific effects of inbreeding in wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster under benign and stressful conditions. Enders LS; Nunney L J Evol Biol; 2010 Nov; 23(11):2309-23. PubMed ID: 20874846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Correlational selection on personality and social plasticity: morphology and social context determine behavioural effects on mating success. Montiglio PO; Wey TW; Chang AT; Fogarty S; Sih A J Anim Ecol; 2017 Mar; 86(2):213-226. PubMed ID: 27859289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Sexual selection leads to a tenfold difference in reproductive success of alternative reproductive tactics in male Atlantic salmon. Tentelier C; Lepais O; Larranaga N; Manicki A; Lange F; Rives J Naturwissenschaften; 2016 Jun; 103(5-6):47. PubMed ID: 27216174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Trade-offs between fighting and breeding: a social network analysis of bison male interactions. Wyman MT; Pinter-Wollman N; Mooring MS J Mammal; 2021 Apr; 102(2):504-519. PubMed ID: 34121954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Environmental quality alters female costs and benefits of evolving under enforced monogamy. Grazer VM; Demont M; Michalczyk Ł; Gage MJ; Martin OY BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Feb; 14():21. PubMed ID: 24499414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]