131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32430258)
1. The role of software in quality assurance for indirect digital intraoral imaging.
Buchanan A; Hancock R; Kalathingal S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Sep; 130(3):313-321. PubMed ID: 32430258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perception versus reality-findings from a phosphor plate quality assurance study.
Buchanan A; Benton B; Carraway A; Looney S; Kalathingal S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Apr; 123(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 28159585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fish scale artefact on an intraoral imaging receptor.
Buchanan A; Morales C; Looney S; Kalathingal S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Dec; 46(8):20170224. PubMed ID: 28749701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postprocessing of all-zirconia restorations in digital dental radiographs: a quality assurance predicament.
Buchanan A; Orta A; Kalathingal S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Apr; 127(4):330-338. PubMed ID: 30661961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variable-resolution cone-beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model.
Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Frydenberg M; Kirkevang LL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Dec; 108(6):939-45. PubMed ID: 19875312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor image plate artifacts and their prevalence.
Elkhateeb SM; Aloyouny AY; Omer MMS; Mansour SM
World J Clin Cases; 2022 Jan; 10(2):437-447. PubMed ID: 35097068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of 3 different disinfection methods on the image quality of photostimulable phosphor plates.
Buchanan A; Ghosh S; Kalathingal S; Dalsania H; Raina R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Feb; 137(2):172-181. PubMed ID: 37926603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of phosphor plate-based radiographic image specifications on fractal analysis of alveolar bone.
Oliveira-Santos N; Michels M; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Oct; 128(4):418-423. PubMed ID: 31324583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of a photostimulable storage phosphor digital system with or without the sharpen filter and cone beam CT for detecting approximal enamel subsurface demineralization.
Belém MD; Tabchoury CP; Ferreira-Santos RI; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120313. PubMed ID: 23412461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of resolution characteristics of digital intraoral radiographic images using a task transfer function.
Kuramoto T; Takarabe S; Tsuru H; Shibayama Y; Kato T; Yoshiura K
Oral Radiol; 2022 Oct; 38(4):638-644. PubMed ID: 35767125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image resolution and exposure time of digital radiographs affects fractal dimension of periapical bone.
Baksi BG; Fidler A
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Oct; 16(5):1507-10. PubMed ID: 22124611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of pixel values for two photostimulable phosphor plates in consecutive standardized scannings.
Freitas P; Yaedú RY; Rubira-Bullen IR; Escarpinati M; Vieira MC; Schiabel H; Lauris JR
Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17119702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of image sharpening on radiographic image quality.
Clark JL; Wadhwani CP; Abramovitch K; Rice DD; Kattadiyil MT
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):927-933. PubMed ID: 30166247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of different spatial resolutions and enhancement filters on radiographic detection of simulated furcation defects with intraoral digital radiography.
Santos CV; Correia VAG; Felizardo HMA; Esteves A; Rossi-Júnior WC; Pigossi SC; Gaêta-Araujo H
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Oct; 136(4):518-528. PubMed ID: 37407350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Efficiency and Image Quality of Photostimulable Phosphor Plate and Charge-Coupled Device Receptors in Dental Radiography.
Zhang W; Huynh C; Jadhav A; Pinales J; Arvizu L; Tsai J; Flores N
J Dent Educ; 2019 Oct; 83(10):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 31235501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the microstructure, chemical composition, and image quality of different PSP receptors.
Souza-Pinto GN; Nejaim Y; Gomes AF; Canteras FB; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
Braz Oral Res; 2022; 36():e130. PubMed ID: 36383836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How many times can we use a phosphor plate? A preliminary study.
Ergün S; Güneri P; Ilgüy D; Ilgüy M; Boyacioglu H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jan; 38(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19114423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of artificial occlusal caries in a phosphor imaging plate system with two types of LCD monitors versus three different films.
Ilgüy M; Dinçer S; Ilgüy D; Bayirli G
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Jun; 22(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 18949518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
