302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32430580)
1. Kinetic modeling and parametric imaging with dynamic PET for oncological applications: general considerations, current clinical applications, and future perspectives.
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Pan L; Sachpekidis C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jan; 48(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 32430580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative approaches of dynamic FDG-PET and PET/CT studies (dPET/CT) for the evaluation of oncological patients.
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Pan L; Strauss LG
Cancer Imaging; 2012 Sep; 12(1):283-9. PubMed ID: 23033440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parametric Imaging With Dynamic PET for Oncological Applications: Protocols, Interpretation, Current Applications and Limitations for Clinical Use.
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Pan L; Sachpekidis C
Semin Nucl Med; 2022 May; 52(3):312-329. PubMed ID: 34809877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long axial field of view (LAFOV) PET-CT: implementation in static and dynamic oncological studies.
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Pan L; Sachpekidis C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Sep; 50(11):3354-3362. PubMed ID: 37079129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total-Body PET Multiparametric Imaging of Cancer Using a Voxelwise Strategy of Compartmental Modeling.
Wang G; Nardo L; Parikh M; Abdelhafez YG; Li E; Spencer BA; Qi J; Jones T; Cherry SR; Badawi RD
J Nucl Med; 2022 Aug; 63(8):1274-1281. PubMed ID: 34795014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitation of dynamic total-body PET imaging: recent developments and future perspectives.
Gu F; Wu Q
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Oct; 50(12):3538-3557. PubMed ID: 37460750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parametric imaging: a promising approach for the evaluation of dynamic PET-18F-FDG studies - the DKFZ experience.
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Pan L; Strauss LG
Hell J Nucl Med; 2010; 13(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 20411165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-axial field-of-view PET/CT: perspectives and review of a revolutionary development in nuclear medicine based on clinical experience in over 7000 patients.
Alberts I; Sari H; Mingels C; Afshar-Oromieh A; Pyka T; Shi K; Rominger A
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Mar; 23(1):28. PubMed ID: 36934273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative studies using positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis and therapy planning of oncological patients.
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Strauss L
Hell J Nucl Med; 2006; 9(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 16617388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatiotemporal analysis of tumor uptake patterns in dynamic (18)FDG-PET and dynamic contrast enhanced CT.
Malinen E; Rødal J; Knudtsen IS; Søvik Å; Skogmo HK
Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):873-82. PubMed ID: 21767187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total-Body PET Kinetic Modeling and Potential Opportunities Using Deep Learning.
Wang Y; Li E; Cherry SR; Wang G
PET Clin; 2021 Oct; 16(4):613-625. PubMed ID: 34353745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phantom Validation of a Conservation of Activity-Based Partial Volume Correction Method for Arterial Input Function in Dynamic PET Imaging.
Driscoll B; Shek T; Vines D; Sun A; Jaffray D; Yeung I
Tomography; 2022 Mar; 8(2):842-857. PubMed ID: 35314646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total Body PET-CT Protocols in Oncology.
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Pan L; Sachpekidis C
Semin Nucl Med; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38851935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oncology.
Schmidt GP; Kramer H; Reiser MF; Glaser C
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 17762383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic whole-body PET imaging: principles, potentials and applications.
Rahmim A; Lodge MA; Karakatsanis NA; Panin VY; Zhou Y; McMillan A; Cho S; Zaidi H; Casey ME; Wahl RL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Feb; 46(2):501-518. PubMed ID: 30269154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Tumor Uptake Heterogeneity Characterization Between Static and Parametric 18F-FDG PET Images in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Tixier F; Vriens D; Cheze-Le Rest C; Hatt M; Disselhorst JA; Oyen WJ; de Geus-Oei LF; Visser EP; Visvikis D
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1033-9. PubMed ID: 26966161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Practical Considerations for Total-Body PET Acquisition and Imaging.
Spencer BA; McBride K; Hunt H; Jones T; Cherry SR; Badawi RD
Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2729():371-389. PubMed ID: 38006507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total-body PET/CT - First Clinical Experiences and Future Perspectives.
Ng QK; Triumbari EKA; Omidvari N; Cherry SR; Badawi RD; Nardo L
Semin Nucl Med; 2022 May; 52(3):330-339. PubMed ID: 35272853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PET Parametric Imaging: Past, Present, and Future.
Wang G; Rahmim A; Gunn RN
IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci; 2020 Nov; 4(6):663-675. PubMed ID: 33763624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
