These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32430796)

  • 1. Stability Assessment of Intracranial Aneurysms Using Machine Learning Based on Clinical and Morphological Features.
    Zhu W; Li W; Tian Z; Zhang Y; Wang K; Zhang Y; Liu J; Yang X
    Transl Stroke Res; 2020 Dec; 11(6):1287-1295. PubMed ID: 32430796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment by flow diverters using machine learning.
    Paliwal N; Jaiswal P; Tutino VM; Shallwani H; Davies JM; Siddiqui AH; Rai R; Meng H
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Nov; 45(5):E7. PubMed ID: 30453461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artificial intelligence applied to development of predictive stability model for intracranial aneurysms.
    Tao J; Wei W; Song M; Hu M; Zhao H; Li S; Shi H; Jia L; Zhang C; Dong X; Chen X
    Eur J Med Res; 2024 Oct; 29(1):505. PubMed ID: 39425221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and validation of machine learning prediction model based on computed tomography angiography-derived hemodynamics for rupture status of intracranial aneurysms: a Chinese multicenter study.
    Chen G; Lu M; Shi Z; Xia S; Ren Y; Liu Z; Liu X; Li Z; Mao L; Li XL; Zhang B; Zhang LJ; Lu GM
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):5170-5182. PubMed ID: 32350658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of Aneurysm Stability Using a Machine Learning Model Based on PyRadiomics-Derived Morphological Features.
    Liu Q; Jiang P; Jiang Y; Ge H; Li S; Jin H; Li Y
    Stroke; 2019 Sep; 50(9):2314-2321. PubMed ID: 31288671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of a dichotomy in morphological predictors of rupture status between sidewall- and bifurcation-type intracranial aneurysms.
    Baharoglu MI; Lauric A; Gao BL; Malek AM
    J Neurosurg; 2012 Apr; 116(4):871-81. PubMed ID: 22242668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphological-Hemodynamic Characteristics of Intracranial Bifurcation Mirror Aneurysms.
    Fan J; Wang Y; Liu J; Jing L; Wang C; Li C; Yang X; Zhang Y
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Jul; 84(1):114-120.e2. PubMed ID: 25753233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can machine learning predict pharmacotherapy outcomes? An application study in osteoporosis.
    Lin YT; Chu CY; Hung KS; Lu CH; Bednarczyk EM; Chen HY
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Oct; 225():107028. PubMed ID: 35930862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can we explain machine learning-based prediction for rupture status assessments of intracranial aneurysms?
    Mu N; Rezaeitaleshmahalleh M; Lyu Z; Wang M; Tang J; Strother CM; Gemmete JJ; Pandey AS; Jiang J
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 36626819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting incomplete occlusion of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters using machine learning models.
    Hammoud B; El Zini J; Awad M; Sweid A; Tjoumakaris S; Jabbour P
    J Neurosurg; 2024 Jun; 140(6):1716-1725. PubMed ID: 38039540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Machine Learning Models can Detect Aneurysm Rupture and Identify Clinical Features Associated with Rupture.
    Silva MA; Patel J; Kavouridis V; Gallerani T; Beers A; Chang K; Hoebel KV; Brown J; See AP; Gormley WB; Aziz-Sultan MA; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Arnaout O; Patel NJ
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Nov; 131():e46-e51. PubMed ID: 31295616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpretable machine learning model to predict rupture of small intracranial aneurysms and facilitate clinical decision.
    Xiong W; Chen T; Li J; Xiang L; Zhang C; Xiang L; Li Y; Chu D; Wu Y; Jie Q; Qiu R; Xu Z; Zou J; Fan H; Zhao Z
    Neurol Sci; 2022 Nov; 43(11):6371-6379. PubMed ID: 35997829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shared and Distinct Rupture Discriminants of Small and Large Intracranial Aneurysms.
    Varble N; Tutino VM; Yu J; Sonig A; Siddiqui AH; Davies JM; Meng H
    Stroke; 2018 Apr; 49(4):856-864. PubMed ID: 29535267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computed Tomography Angiography Evaluation of Risk Factors for Unstable Intracranial Aneurysms.
    Wang GX; Gong MF; Wen L; Liu LL; Yin JB; Duan CM; Zhang D
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jul; 115():e27-e32. PubMed ID: 29567291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of rupture risk in anterior communicating artery aneurysms with a feed-forward artificial neural network.
    Liu J; Chen Y; Lan L; Lin B; Chen W; Wang M; Li R; Yang Y; Zhao B; Hu Z; Duan Y
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3268-3275. PubMed ID: 29476219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of statistical learning approaches for cerebral aneurysm rupture assessment.
    Detmer FJ; Lückehe D; Mut F; Slawski M; Hirsch S; Bijlenga P; von Voigt G; Cebral JR
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Jan; 15(1):141-150. PubMed ID: 31485987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Classification models using circulating neutrophil transcripts can detect unruptured intracranial aneurysm.
    Poppenberg KE; Tutino VM; Li L; Waqas M; June A; Chaves L; Jiang K; Jarvis JN; Sun Y; Snyder KV; Levy EI; Siddiqui AH; Kolega J; Meng H
    J Transl Med; 2020 Oct; 18(1):392. PubMed ID: 33059716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of bleb formation in intracranial aneurysms using machine learning models based on aneurysm hemodynamics, geometry, location, and patient population.
    Salimi Ashkezari SF; Mut F; Slawski M; Cheng B; Yu AK; White TG; Woo HH; Koch MJ; Amin-Hanjani S; Charbel FT; Rezai Jahromi B; Niemelä M; Koivisto T; Frosen J; Tobe Y; Maiti S; Robertson AM; Cebral JR
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2022 Oct; 14(10):1002-1007. PubMed ID: 34686573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT-based radiomics analysis of different machine learning models for differentiating benign and malignant parotid tumors.
    Zheng Y; Zhou D; Liu H; Wen M
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):6953-6964. PubMed ID: 35484339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Integrated Model Combining Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms for Classification of Rupture Status of IAs.
    Chen R; Mo X; Chen Z; Feng P; Li H
    Front Neurol; 2022; 13():868395. PubMed ID: 35645962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.