These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32431886)

  • 1. Multiple factors affect discrimination learning performance, but not between-individual variation, in wild mixed-species flocks of birds.
    Reichert MS; Crofts SJ; Davidson GL; Firth JA; Kulahci IG; Quinn JL
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Apr; 7(4):192107. PubMed ID: 32431886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game.
    Reichert MS; Morand-Ferron J; Kulahci IG; Firth JA; Davidson GL; Crofts SJ; Quinn JL
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Nov; 90(11):2497-2509. PubMed ID: 34091901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive flexibility in the wild: Individual differences in reversal learning are explained primarily by proactive interference, not by sampling strategies, in two passerine bird species.
    Morand-Ferron J; Reichert MS; Quinn JL
    Learn Behav; 2022 Mar; 50(1):153-166. PubMed ID: 35015239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Taking the Operant Paradigm into the Field: Associative Learning in Wild Great Tits.
    Morand-Ferron J; Hamblin S; Cole EF; Aplin LM; Quinn JL
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133821. PubMed ID: 26288131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. To graze or gorge: consistency and flexibility of individual foraging tactics in tits.
    Milligan ND; Radersma R; Cole EF; Sheldon BC
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Jul; 86(4):826-836. PubMed ID: 28191628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of memory and the hippocampus: comparison of food-storing and nonstoring birds on a one-trial associative memory task.
    Clayton NS
    J Neurosci; 1995 Apr; 15(4):2796-807. PubMed ID: 7722629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Episodic-like memory in wild free-living blue tits and great tits.
    Davies JR; Keuneke LS; Clayton NS; Davidson GL
    Curr Biol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38964317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the importance of accounting for alternative foraging tactics when assessing cognitive performance in wild animals.
    Vernouillet A
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Nov; 90(11):2474-2477. PubMed ID: 34734419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artificial selection for reversal learning reveals limited repeatability and no heritability of cognitive flexibility in great tits (
    van den Heuvel K; Quinn JL; Kotrschal A; van Oers K
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Jul; 290(2003):20231067. PubMed ID: 37464752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social learning within and across predator species reduces attacks on novel aposematic prey.
    Hämäläinen L; Mappes J; Rowland HM; Teichmann M; Thorogood R
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 May; 89(5):1153-1164. PubMed ID: 32077104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Worms under cover: relationships between performance in learning tasks and personality in great tits (Parus major).
    Amy M; van Oers K; Naguib M
    Anim Cogn; 2012 Sep; 15(5):763-70. PubMed ID: 22532072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social phenotype-dependent selection of social environment in wild great and blue tits: an experimental study.
    Regan CE; Beck KB; McMahon K; Crofts S; Firth JA; Sheldon BC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Nov; 289(1986):20221602. PubMed ID: 36350218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different Seasonal Patterns in Song System Volume in Willow Tits and Great Tits.
    Longmoor GK; Lange CH; Darvell H; Walker L; Rytkönen S; Vatka E; Hohtola E; Orell M; Smulders TV
    Brain Behav Evol; 2016; 87(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 27442125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tits on the move: exploring the impact of environmental change on blue tit and great tit migration distance.
    Smallegange IM; Fiedler W; Köppen U; Geiter O; Bairlein F
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Mar; 79(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 20002861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning the ecological niche.
    Slagsvold T; Wiebe KL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jan; 274(1606):19-23. PubMed ID: 17015332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in the use of social information in foraging by captive great tits.
    Marchetti C; Drent PJ
    Anim Behav; 2000 Jul; 60(1):131-140. PubMed ID: 10924212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blue tits are outperformed by great tits in a test of motor inhibition, and experience does not improve their performance.
    Urhan U; Mårdberg M; Isaksson E; van Oers K; Brodin A
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Feb; 10(2):221176. PubMed ID: 36844809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the sex and age of birds and the size of human settlements affect recapturing of the Great Tit (Parus major) at bird feeders?
    Golawski A; Polakowski M; Filimowski P; Stępniewski K; Stępniewska K; Kiljan G; Kilon D; Pietkiewicz M; Sztwiertnia H; Cichocka A; Kosicki JZ
    Behav Processes; 2019 May; 162():162-166. PubMed ID: 30885678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perfluoroalkyl acid (PFAA) profile and concentrations in two co-occurring tit species: distinct differences indicate non-generalizable results across passerines.
    Lasters R; Groffen T; Bervoets L; Eens M
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Mar; 761():143301. PubMed ID: 33183821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Great tits do not compensate over time for a radio-tag-induced reduction in escape-flight performance.
    Tomotani BM; Muijres FT; Johnston B; van der Jeugd HP; Naguib M
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Dec; 11(23):16600-16617. PubMed ID: 34938460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.