BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32434406)

  • 1. Reasons for Conversion and Adverse Intraoperative Events in Robotically Enhanced Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Revascularization.
    van der Merwe J; Casselman F; Vermeulen Y; Stockman B; Degrieck I; Van Praet F
    Innovations (Phila); 2020; 15(3):251-260. PubMed ID: 32434406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reason and Timing for Conversion to Sternotomy in Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Patient Outcomes.
    Christidis NK; Fox SA; Swinamer SA; Bagur R; Sridhar K; Lavi S; Iglesias I; Bainbridge D; Jones PM; Harle CC; Chu MWA; Teefy P; Kiaii BB
    Innovations (Phila); 2018; 13(6):423-427. PubMed ID: 30540591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Analysis of Perioperative and Mid-Term Results of TECAB and MIDCAB for Revascularization of Anterior Wall.
    Kofler M; Schachner T; Reinstadler SJ; Stastny L; Dumfarth J; Wiedemann D; Feuchtner G; Friedrich G; Bonatti J; Bonaros N
    Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(3):207-213. PubMed ID: 28542076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Novel Approach Using Computed Tomography Angiograms to Predict Sternotomy or Complicated Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Robotically Assisted Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass.
    Cook RC; Fung AY; Percy ED; Mayo JR
    Innovations (Phila); 2018; 13(3):207-210. PubMed ID: 29905587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mid-Term Follow-up of Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Is the Early Learning Phase Detrimental?
    Rodriguez ML; Lapierre HR; Sohmer B; Glineur D; Ruel M
    Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(2):116-120. PubMed ID: 28328569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes after different non-sternotomy approaches to left single-vessel revascularization: a comparative study with up to 10-year follow-up.
    Sabashnikov A; Patil NP; Weymann A; Mohite PN; Zych B; García Sáez D; Popov AF; Wahlers T; Wittwer T; Wippermann J; Amrani M; Trimlett R; Simon AR; Pepper J; Bahrami T
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Oct; 46(4):e48-55. PubMed ID: 25064052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost and Outcome of Minimally Invasive Techniques for Coronary Surgery Using Robotic Technology.
    Pasrija C; Kon ZN; Ghoreishi M; Lehr EJ; Gammie JS; Griffith BP; Bonatti J; Taylor BS
    Innovations (Phila); 2018; 13(4):282-286. PubMed ID: 30130263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lessons learned from robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery: risk factors for conversion to median sternotomy.
    Daniel WT; Puskas JD; Baio KT; Liberman HA; Devireddy C; Finn A; Halkos ME
    Innovations (Phila); 2012; 7(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 23274864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolution of Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Learning Curve.
    Andrawes PA; Shariff MA; Nabagiez JP; Steward R; Azab B; Povar N; Sarza M; Demissie S; Sadel SM; Nichols M; McGinn JT
    Innovations (Phila); 2018; 13(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 29697596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pain and the Quality of Life Following Robotic Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery.
    Ezelsoy M; Oral K; Caynak B; Bayramoglu Z; Akpinar B
    Heart Surg Forum; 2016 Aug; 19(4):E165-8. PubMed ID: 27585193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical factors influencing surgical approach selection of robotic-enhanced minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting].
    Cheng N; Gao CQ; Yang M; Wu Y
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 51(11):1016-20. PubMed ID: 24444688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors and Outcomes of Sternotomy Conversion and Cardiopulmonary Bypass Assistance in Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
    Rodriguez ML; Lapierre HR; Sohmer B; Ruel JP; Ruel MA
    Innovations (Phila); 2016; 11(5):315-320. PubMed ID: 27828807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass surgery via distal mini-sternotomy : Promising clinical results with anaortic, multivessel, all-arterial technique.
    Martinovic I; Lindemann S; Irqsusi M; Mirat J; Vcev A; Wittlinger T; Noutsias M
    Herz; 2019 Nov; 44(7):666-672. PubMed ID: 29637231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: anesthetic, monitoring, and pain control considerations.
    Heres EK; Marquez J; Malkowski MJ; Magovern JA; Gravlee GP
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1998 Aug; 12(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 9713723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robot-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. ThoraCAB.
    Ishikawa N; Watanabe G; Tomita S; Yamaguchi S; Nishida Y; Iino K
    Circ J; 2014; 78(2):399-402. PubMed ID: 24334565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early and long-term clinical outcomes after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting versus off-pump coronary surgery via sternotomy in isolated proximal left anterior descending artery disease: A propensity score matching analysis.
    Stanislawski R; Aboul-Hassan SS; Marczak J; Stankowski T; Peksa M; Nawotka M; Cichon R
    J Card Surg; 2020 Dec; 35(12):3412-3419. PubMed ID: 32985720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lateral MIDCAB grafting via limited posterior thoracotomy.
    Fonger JD; Doty JR; Sussman MS; Salomon NW
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1997 Sep; 12(3):399-404; discussion 404-5. PubMed ID: 9332918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High thoracic epidural anesthesia for coronary artery bypass grafting using two different surgical approaches in conscious patients.
    Kessler P; Neidhart G; Bremerich DH; Aybek T; Dogan S; Lischke V; Byhahn C
    Anesth Analg; 2002 Oct; 95(4):791-7, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12351247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB): two techniques for beating heart surgery.
    Detter C; Reichenspurner H; Boehm DH; Thalhammer M; Raptis P; Schütz A; Reichart B
    Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 12114131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in the era of percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Raffa GM; Malvindi PG; Ornaghi D; Citterio E; Cappai A; Basciu A; Barbone A; Fossati F; Tarelli G; Settepani F
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2015 Feb; 16(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 23877205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.