These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32434933)

  • 1. An instrument for assessing the quality of informed consent documents for elective procedures: development and testing.
    Spatz ES; Suter LG; George E; Perez M; Curry L; Desai V; Bao H; Geary LL; Herrin J; Lin Z; Bernheim SM; Krumholz HM
    BMJ Open; 2020 May; 10(5):e033297. PubMed ID: 32434933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of informed consent documents among US. hospitals: a cross-sectional study.
    Spatz ES; Bao H; Herrin J; Desai V; Ramanan S; Lines L; Dendy R; Bernheim SM; Krumholz HM; Lin Z; Suter LG
    BMJ Open; 2020 May; 10(5):e033299. PubMed ID: 32434934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elements of informed consent and decision quality were poorly correlated in informed consent documents.
    Brehaut JC; Carroll K; Elwyn G; Saginur R; Kimmelman J; Shojania K; Syrowatka A; Nguyen T; Fergusson D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1472-80. PubMed ID: 25857675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a New Tool for Writing Research Key Information in Plain Language.
    Kurtz-Rossi S; Okonkwo IA; Chen Y; Dueñas N; Bilodeau T; Rushforth A; Klein A
    Health Lit Res Pract; 2024 Jan; 8(1):e30-e37. PubMed ID: 38466225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Participatory improvement of a template for informed consent documents in biobank research - study results and methodological reflections.
    Bossert S; Kahrass H; Heinemeyer U; Prokein J; Strech D
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):78. PubMed ID: 29262814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Formal quality assessment of informed consent documents in 9 hospitals].
    Calle-Urra JE; Parra-Hidalgo P; Saturno-Hernández PJ; Martínez-Martínez MJ; Navarro-Moya FJ
    Rev Calid Asist; 2013; 28(4):234-43. PubMed ID: 23867613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed Consent Documents Used in Critical Care Trials Often Do Not Implement Recommendations.
    Atwere P; McIntyre L; Carroll K; Hayes T; Brehaut JC
    Crit Care Med; 2018 Feb; 46(2):e111-e117. PubMed ID: 29088004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do informed consent documents for chiropractic clinical research studies meet readability level recommendations and contain required elements: a descriptive study.
    Twist E; Lawrence DJ; Salsbury SA; Hawk C
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2014; 22(1):40. PubMed ID: 25505516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is there an impact of a video-based patient informed consent in elective hand surgery?
    Osterloh J; Müller-Seubert W; Cai A; Arkudas A; Horch RRE
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Jun; 144(6):2899-2903. PubMed ID: 38850419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Satisfying the needs of Japanese cancer patients: a comparative study of detailed and standard informed consent documents.
    Sato K; Watanabe T; Katsumata N; Sato T; Ohashi Y
    Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 24408900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.
    Emanuel EJ; Boyle CW
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e2110843. PubMed ID: 33909052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed consent documents do not encourage good-quality decision making.
    Brehaut JC; Carroll K; Elwyn G; Saginur R; Kimmelman J; Shojania K; Syrowatka A; Nguyen T; Hoe E; Fergusson D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 65(7):708-24. PubMed ID: 22537428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring the process and quality of informed consent for clinical research: development and testing.
    Cohn EG; Jia H; Smith WC; Erwin K; Larson EL
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2011 Jul; 38(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 21708532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects.
    Joffe S; Cook EF; Cleary PD; Clark JW; Weeks JC
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Jan; 93(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 11208884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed consent conversations and documents: A quantitative comparison.
    Koyfman SA; Reddy CA; Hizlan S; Leek AC; Kodish AE;
    Cancer; 2016 Feb; 122(3):464-9. PubMed ID: 26505269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of study-related patient information sheets in randomised neuro-oncology phase III-trials.
    Reinert C; Kremmler L; Burock S; Bogdahn U; Wick W; Gleiter CH; Koller M; Hau P
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):150-8. PubMed ID: 24103146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hospital informed consent for procedure forms: facilitating quality patient-physician interaction.
    Bottrell MM; Alpert H; Fischbach RL; Emanuel LL
    Arch Surg; 2000 Jan; 135(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 10636343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Details of risk-benefit communication in informed consent documents for phase I/II trials.
    Kahrass H; Bossert S; Schürmann C; Strech D
    Clin Trials; 2021 Feb; 18(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 33231107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation and Improvement of the Informed Consent Documents in 9 Hospitals, Spain].
    Calle-Urra JE; Parra-Hidalgo P; Saturno-Hernández P; Fonseca-Miranda Y; Martínez-Martínez MJ
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2015; 89(3):307-19. PubMed ID: 26388344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.