These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32435547)

  • 1. Exploring the interactions among SNARC effect, finger counting direction and embodied cognition.
    Prete G; Tommasi L
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9155. PubMed ID: 32435547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unimanual SNARC Effect: Hand Matters.
    Riello M; Rusconi E
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():372. PubMed ID: 22207856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No fingers, no SNARC? Neither the finger counting starting hand, nor its stability robustly affect the SNARC effect.
    Hohol M; Wołoszyn K; Cipora K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Oct; 230():103765. PubMed ID: 36242923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space-number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants).
    Pellegrino M; Pinto M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Rossi-Arnaud C; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 237(10):2633-2643. PubMed ID: 31384968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How Deep Is Your SNARC? Interactions Between Numerical Magnitude, Response Hands, and Reachability in Peripersonal Space.
    Lohmann J; Schroeder PA; Nuerk HC; Plewnia C; Butz MV
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():622. PubMed ID: 29765347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
    Patro K; Shaki S
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cultural factors weaken but do not reverse left-to-right spatial biases in numerosity processing: Data from Arabic and English monoliterates and Arabic-English biliterates.
    Lopiccolo D; Chang CB
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261146. PubMed ID: 34914756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial-numerical association of response code effect as a window to mental representation of magnitude in long-term memory among Hebrew-speaking children.
    Feldman A; Oscar-Strom Y; Tzelgov J; Berger A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 May; 181():102-109. PubMed ID: 30735908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?
    Mapelli D; Rusconi E; Umiltà C
    Cognition; 2003 Jul; 88(3):B1-10. PubMed ID: 12804817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practice-induced SNARC: evidence from a null-SNARC sample.
    Palaz E; Çetinkaya H; Tuncali Z; Kamar B; Dural S
    Cogn Process; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38739287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The SNARC effect: a preregistered study on the interaction of horizontal, vertical, and sagittal spatial-numerical associations.
    Aleotti S; Massaccesi S; Priftis K
    Psychol Res; 2023 Jun; 87(4):1256-1266. PubMed ID: 35960336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Number Location on the SNARC Effect: Evidence From the Processing of Rotated Traditional Chinese Numerical Words.
    Wang Z; Zhu X; Jiang Y
    Iperception; 2020; 11(2):2041669520917169. PubMed ID: 32284844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconstructing the origins of the space-number association: spatial and number-magnitude codes must be used jointly to elicit spatially organised mental number lines.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Doricchi F
    Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():143-156. PubMed ID: 31079015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Number space is made by response space: Evidence from left spatial neglect.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Scozia G; D'Onofrio M; Raffa G; Nigro S; Arnaud CR; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Apr; 154():107773. PubMed ID: 33567295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Crossed hands and the SNARC effect: a failure to replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993).
    Wood G; Nuerk HC; Willmes K
    Cortex; 2006 Nov; 42(8):1069-79; discussion 1119-23. PubMed ID: 17209413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-symbolic magnitudes are represented spatially: Evidence from a non-symbolic SNARC task.
    Nemeh F; Humberstone J; Yates MJ; Reeve RA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203019. PubMed ID: 30161171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanism of the SNARC Effect in Numerical Magnitude, Time Sequence, and Spatial Sequence Tasks: Involvement of LTM and WM.
    Wang Q; Liu M; Shi W; Kang J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1558. PubMed ID: 30186215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The SNARC and MARC effects measured online: Large-scale assessment methods in flexible cognitive effects.
    Cipora K; Soltanlou M; Reips UD; Nuerk HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Aug; 51(4):1676-1692. PubMed ID: 30805864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.