These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32438023)

  • 1. Controversy and debate on credibility ceilings. Paper 2: Using credibility ceilings to explore skepticism about observational evidence.
    Ioannidis JPA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():211-213. PubMed ID: 32438023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Synthesis of observational studies should consider credibility ceilings.
    Salanti G; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 62(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 19131013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controversy and debate on credibility ceilings. Paper 4: Credibility ceilings da capo.
    Ioannidis JPA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():217. PubMed ID: 32438025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controversy and debate on credibility ceilings. Paper 3: errors in the statistical justification for the "credibility ceiling" method remain uncorrected.
    Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():214-216. PubMed ID: 32442482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controversy and debate on credibility ceilings. Paper 1: Fundamental problems with the "credibility ceiling" method for meta-analyses.
    Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():208-210. PubMed ID: 32450128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of credibility ceilings probes the robustness of meta-analyses of biomarkers and cancer risk.
    Papatheodorou SI; Tsilidis KK; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 25433443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.
    Patton MQ
    Health Serv Res; 1999 Dec; 34(5 Pt 2):1189-208. PubMed ID: 10591279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of servicescape and service credibility on older adults' intention to recover.
    Lai KP; Chong SC
    J Health Organ Manag; 2020 Feb; ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):. PubMed ID: 32064822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate.
    Yamamoto YT
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Jan; 21(1):101-25. PubMed ID: 22530490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of perforated metal ceiling systems (supported airflow ceilings) with laminar airflow ceilings in type A (DIN 1946 T.4) operating rooms under surgical conditions].
    Bischoff WE; Kindermann A; Sander U; Sander J
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1995 Oct; 198(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 9409897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 7: Response to comments on the paper 2-6 re "Improving the generalizability and credibility of Core Outcome Sets (COSs) by involving large international sample of participants".
    Chevance A; Tran VT; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():232-234. PubMed ID: 32565218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 6: Improving the generalizability, credibility and implementation of core outcome sets - the example of the Cochrane Skin-Core Outcome Set Initiative (CS-COUSIN).
    Schmitt J; Kottner J; Lange T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():229-231. PubMed ID: 32413389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Controversy matters: Impacts of topic and solution controversy on the perceived credibility of a scientist who advocates.
    Beall L; Myers TA; Kotcher JE; Vraga EK; Maibach EW
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187511. PubMed ID: 29136643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Credibility of observational studies: why public health researchers should care?
    Boccia S
    Eur J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 25(4):554-5. PubMed ID: 26138821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reconsidering evaluation criteria regarding health care research: toward an integrative framework of quantitative and qualitative criteria].
    Miyata H; Kai I
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2006 May; 53(5):319-28. PubMed ID: 16813064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of patient reimbursement method on health-care utilization: evidence from China.
    Zhong H
    Health Econ; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1312-29. PubMed ID: 20882574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lung cancer from asbestos textured ceilings: a case study.
    Dahlgren JG; Talbott PJ
    Int J Occup Environ Health; 2016 Apr; 22(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 27097900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens.
    Cutcliffe JR; McKenna HP
    J Adv Nurs; 1999 Aug; 30(2):374-80. PubMed ID: 10457239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of top-level domains and advertisements on health web-site credibility.
    Walther JB; Wang Z; Loh T
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Sep; 6(3):e24. PubMed ID: 15471750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blinding protocols, treatment credibility, and expectancy: methodologic issues in clinical trials of osteopathic manipulative treatment.
    Licciardone JC; Russo DP
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2006 Aug; 106(8):457-63. PubMed ID: 16943515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.