These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32438429)

  • 1. Evaluation of Mandibular First Molars' Axial Inclination and Alveolar Morphology in Different Facial Patterns: A CBCT Study.
    Ferreira MC; Freitas KMS; Herrera-Sanches FS; Santos PBD; Garib D; Janson G; Freitas MR
    Eur J Dent; 2020 Mar; 14(2):250-259. PubMed ID: 32438429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of WALA ridge in different facial patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Tonial FG; Ferreira MC; Araki J; de Mello Ferreira V; da Luz Silva Lima M; Guimarães CH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jun; 161(6):e580-e587. PubMed ID: 35430089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Miniscrew insertion sites of infrazygomatic crest and mandibular buccal shelf in different vertical craniofacial patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Matias M; Flores-Mir C; Almeida MR; Vieira BDS; Freitas KMS; Nunes DC; Ferreira MC; Ursi W
    Korean J Orthod; 2021 Nov; 51(6):387-396. PubMed ID: 34803027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Median mandibular flexure at different mouth opening and its relation to different facial types: A prospective clinical study.
    Prasad M; Hussain MZ; Shetty SK; Kumar TA; Khaur M; George SA; Dalwai S
    J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2013 Jul; 4(2):426-30. PubMed ID: 24082745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical facial patterns: a cross-sectional study in growing children.
    Lione R; Franchi L; Noviello A; Bollero P; Fanucci E; Cozza P
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Oct; 35(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 24081727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional evaluation of molar buccolingual inclinations after orthodontic treatment using edgewise mechanics.
    Billings B; Helms L; Kula K; Utreja A; Eckert G; Ghoneima A
    Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):529-542. PubMed ID: 28803805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptions of brachyfacial, mesofacial and dolichofacial individuals with regard to the buccal corridor in different facial types.
    Pithon MM; Mata KR; Rocha KS; Costa Bdo N; Neves F; Barbosa GC; Coqueiro Rda S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014; 22(5):382-9. PubMed ID: 25466472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristics of Spatial Changes in Molars and Alveolar Bone Resorption among Patients with Loss of Mandibular First Molars: A CBCT-Based Morphometric Study.
    Hong H; Zhou J; Fan Q; Jiao R; Kuang Q; Zhou H; Hua C; Yang Z; Lai W; Long H
    J Clin Med; 2023 Mar; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 36902721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft- and Hard-Tissue Thicknesses in Patients with Different Vertical Facial Patterns and the Transverse Deficiencies, An Integrated CBCT-3D Digital Model Analysis.
    Zaragoza Ballester A; Ferrando Cascales Á; Barrera Mora JM; Friedlander I; Agustín-Panadero R; Ferrando Cascales R
    J Clin Med; 2023 Feb; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 36835918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transverse Analysis of Maxilla and Mandible in Adults with Normal Occlusion: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Lee KJ; Jeon HH; Boucher N; Chung CH
    J Imaging; 2022 Apr; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 35448227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the correlation between facial index and the cortical bone thickness of the maxilla and mandible-A computer tomography based study.
    Dixit S; Shyagali TR; Kambalyal P
    Arch Oral Biol; 2023 Feb; 146():105606. PubMed ID: 36577312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of cone beam CT volume orientation on alveolar bone measurements in patients with different facial profiles.
    Costa ED; Peyneau PD; Ambrosano GMB; Oliveira ML
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Sep; 48(6):20180330. PubMed ID: 30864821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bucco alveolar bone thickness of mandibular impacted third molars with different inclinations: a CBCT study.
    Zambrano-De la Peña LS; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA; Ruiz-Mora GA; Arriola-Guillén LE; Guerrero ME
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2020 Sep; 42(9):1051-1056. PubMed ID: 32140764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epidemiological survey on third molar agenesis and facial pattern among adolescents requiring orthodontic treatment.
    Gómez de Diego R; Montero J; López-Valverde N; Ignacio de Nieves J; Prados-Frutos JC; López-Valverde A
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Sep; 9(9):e1088-e1095. PubMed ID: 29075410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Association Between Skeletal Facial Types and Third Molars Impaction in a Saudi Arabian Subpopulation: A CBCT Study.
    Bin Rubaia'an MA; Neyaz A; Talic F; Alkhamis A; Alghabban A; Assari A
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2023; 15():143-156. PubMed ID: 37601239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Buccolingual Inclination of Second Molars in Untreated Adolescents and Adults with Near Normal Occlusion: A CBCT Study.
    Li C; Dimitrova B; Boucher NS; Chung CH
    J Clin Med; 2022 Nov; 11(22):. PubMed ID: 36431105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Movement of mandibular molar into edentulous alveolar ridge: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Santos PBDD; Herrera Sanches FS; Ferreira MC; de Almeida ALPF; Janson G; Garib D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):907-913. PubMed ID: 28457268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of facial types on the morphology and location of the greater palatine foramen: a CBCT study.
    Lacerda-Santos JT; Granja GL; de Freitas GB; Manhães LRC; de Melo DP; Dos Santos JA
    Oral Radiol; 2022 Jul; 38(3):337-343. PubMed ID: 34409547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Anthropometric analysis of the mandible morphology in young females with different vertical skeletal pattern].
    Xie Z; Li G; Guo J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 30(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 22768772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability associated with mandibular buccal shelf area width and height in subjects with different growth pattern, sex, and growth status.
    Gandhi V; Upadhyay M; Tadinada A; Yadav S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jan; 159(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 33221093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.