467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32438461)
1. Magnetic resonance scoring system for assessment of adnexal masses: added value of diffusion-weighted imaging including apparent diffusion coefficient map.
Hottat NA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 32438461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Added Value of Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Hottat NA; Badr DA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jul; 56(1):158-170. PubMed ID: 34797013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of benign from malignant adnexal masses by functional 3 tesla MRI techniques: diffusion-weighted imaging and time-intensity curves of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Malek M; Pourashraf M; Mousavi AS; Rahmani M; Ahmadinejad N; Alipour A; Hashemi FS; Shakiba M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(8):3407-12. PubMed ID: 25921153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of the ADNEX MR scoring system based on a simplified MRI protocol for the assessment of adnexal masses.
Pereira PN; Sarian LO; Yoshida A; Araújo KG; Barros RHO; Baião AC; Parente DB; Derchain S
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(2):63-71. PubMed ID: 29467113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and Reproducibility of the ADNEX MR Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses.
Basha MAA; Abdelrahman HM; Metwally MI; Alayouty NA; Mohey N; Zaitoun MMA; Almassry HN; Yousef HY; El Sammak AA; Aly SA; Algazzar HY; Farag MAEM; Mosallam W; Abo Shanab WS; Ibrahim SA; Mohamed EA; Mohamed AEM; Afifi AHM; Harb OA; Azmy TM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):292-304. PubMed ID: 32715577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External validation of the MR imaging scoring system for the management of adnexal masses.
Ruiz M; Labauge P; Louboutin A; Limot O; Fauconnier A; Huchon C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():115-9. PubMed ID: 27583370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ADC-derived spatial features can accurately classify adnexal lesions.
Fathi Kazerooni A; Nabil M; Haghighat Khah H; Alviri M; Heidari-Sooreshjaani M; Gity M; Malek M; Saligheh Rad H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1061-1071. PubMed ID: 28901638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. External validation of ADNEX MR SCORING system: a single-centre retrospective study.
Sasaguri K; Yamaguchi K; Nakazono T; Mizuguchi M; Aishima S; Yokoyama M; Irie H
Clin Radiol; 2019 Feb; 74(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 30514585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modified MR scoring system for assessment of sonographically indeterminate ovarian and adnexal masses in the absence of dynamic contrast-enhanced.
Moradi B; Rahmani M; Aghasi M; Yarandi F; Malek M; Hosseini A; Ghafouri K; Hasan Zadeh Tabatabaei MS; Shirali E; Riahi Samani P; Firouznia S
Br J Radiol; 2024 Jan; 97(1153):150-158. PubMed ID: 38263830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pattern Recognition or Adnexal MR Scoring System: Which Is More Accurate in Evaluating Adnexal Lesions?
Malek M; Hosseini A; Moradi B; Rahmani M; Aghasi M; Akhavan S; Ahmadinejad N; Abdolghafoorian H
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 Apr; 25(4):1265-1270. PubMed ID: 38679986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Accuracies of the Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging ADNEX Scoring Systems For Ovarian Adnexal Mass: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cui L; Xu H; Zhang Y
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):897-908. PubMed ID: 34217614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion in characterization of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses.
Kaur G; Manchanda S; Sharma R; Vyas S; Kandasamy D; Hari S; Bhatla N; Mathur SR
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 May; 49(5):1512-1521. PubMed ID: 38607571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subjective assessment and IOTA ADNEX model in evaluation of adnexal masses in patients with history of breast cancer.
Pozzati F; Sassu CM; Marini G; Mascilini F; Biscione A; Giannarelli D; Garganese G; Fragomeni SM; Scambia G; Testa AC; Moro F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 62(4):594-602. PubMed ID: 37204769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of the Ovarian-Adnexa Reporting and Data System Ultrasound Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and the ADNEX MR Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses.
Wang T; Cui W; Nie F; Huang X; Huang L; Liu L; Zhu Y; Zheng R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Sep; 49(9):2072-2080. PubMed ID: 37321953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adnexal masses: development and preliminary validation of an MR imaging scoring system.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Aubert E; Rockall A; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Rouzier R; Daraï E; Bazot M
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):432-43. PubMed ID: 23468574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay.
Di Legge A; Pollastri P; Mancari R; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Franchi D; Jurkovic D; Coccia ME; Timmerman D; Scambia G; Testa A; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 28004457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ADNEX model to triage adnexal masses: An external validation study and comparison with the IOTA two-step strategy and subjective assessment by an experienced ultrasound operator.
Viora E; Piovano E; Baima Poma C; Cotrino I; Castiglione A; Cavallero C; Sciarrone A; Bastonero S; Iskra L; Zola P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():207-211. PubMed ID: 32146226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
