These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32438851)

  • 1. Can hype be a force for good?: Inviting unexpected engagement with science and technology futures.
    Roberson TM
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Jul; 29(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32438851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Science communication in transition: genomics hype, public engagement, education and commercialization pressures.
    Bubela T
    Clin Genet; 2006 Nov; 70(5):445-50. PubMed ID: 17026631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hype and public trust in science.
    Master Z; Resnik DB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2013 Jun; 19(2):321-35. PubMed ID: 22045550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spinning the Genome: Why Science Hype Matters.
    Caulfield T
    Perspect Biol Med; 2018; 61(4):560-571. PubMed ID: 30613038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Science and the sources of hype.
    Caulfield T; Condit C
    Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(3-4):209-17. PubMed ID: 22488464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to (or not to) communicate science.
    Rose SP
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2003 Apr; 31(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 12653626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. More engagement but less participation: China's alternative approach to public communication of science and technology.
    Jia H
    Public Underst Sci; 2022 Apr; 31(3):331-339. PubMed ID: 35491921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ecological validity and the study of publics: The case for organic public engagement methods.
    Gehrke PJ
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 23887250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unbalanced progress: The hard road from science popularisation to public engagement with science in China.
    Jia H; Liu L
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 24434709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? How do the shifting information flows in healthcare affect the deficit model of science communication?
    Ko H
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):427-32. PubMed ID: 27117770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A surfeit of science: The "CSI effect" and the media appropriation of the public understanding of science.
    Cole SA
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Feb; 24(2):130-46. PubMed ID: 23825289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Promises and perils of gene drives: Navigating the communication of complex, post-normal science.
    Brossard D; Belluck P; Gould F; Wirz CD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Apr; 116(16):7692-7697. PubMed ID: 30642954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. UK science press officers, professional vision and the generation of expectations.
    Samuel G; Williams C; Gardner J
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Jan; 26(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 26265709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inaccuracies: Axe science hype from social media.
    Smoliga JM; Kendall CJ
    Nature; 2017 Feb; 542(7639):31. PubMed ID: 28150756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives.
    Woolley JP; McGowan ML; Teare HJ; Coathup V; Fishman JR; Settersten RA; Sterckx S; Kaye J; Juengst ET
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Jun; 17(1):33. PubMed ID: 27260081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expectations and beliefs in science communication: Learning from three European gene therapy discussions of the early 1990s.
    Meyer G
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Apr; 25(3):317-31. PubMed ID: 25313143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biotechnology and the popular press: hype and the selling of science.
    Caulfield T
    Trends Biotechnol; 2004 Jul; 22(7):337-9. PubMed ID: 15245905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. To hype, or not to(o) hype. Communication of science is often tarnished by sensationalization, for which both scientists and the media are responsible.
    Rinaldi A
    EMBO Rep; 2012 Apr; 13(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 22422003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Science, misinformation and digital technology during the Covid-19 pandemic.
    Monasterio Astobiza A
    Hist Philos Life Sci; 2021 May; 43(2):68. PubMed ID: 33977437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Bio:Fiction film festival: Sensing how a debate about synthetic biology might evolve.
    Schmidt M; Meyer A; Cserer A
    Public Underst Sci; 2015 Jul; 24(5):619-35. PubMed ID: 24164747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.