These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32440035)

  • 1. Assessment of adhesive bond strength from ultrasonic tone-bursts.
    Cantrell JH
    J Nondestr Eval; 2018; 37(4):. PubMed ID: 32440035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A constant-frequency ultrasonic phase method for monitoring imperfect adherent/adhesive interfaces.
    Haldren H; Yost WT; Perey D; Elliott Cramer K; Gupta MC
    Ultrasonics; 2022 Mar; 120():106641. PubMed ID: 34808475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Swept-frequency ultrasonic phase evaluation of adhesive bonding in tri-layer structures.
    Haldren HA; Perey DF; Yost WT; Cramer KE; Gupta MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Mar; 145(3):1609. PubMed ID: 31067958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laser ultrasonic characterization of adhesive bonds between epoxy coating and aluminum substrate.
    Wang H; Qian ML; Liu W
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e1349-53. PubMed ID: 16782159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Ultrasonic Vibration on Adhesive Bonding of CFRP/Al Alloy Joints Grafted with Silane Coupling Agent.
    Wu M; Tong X; Wang H; Hua L; Chen Y
    Polymers (Basel); 2020 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 32325793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasonic measurement of the diffusion bond strength.
    Lavrentyev AI; Beals JT
    Ultrasonics; 2000 Mar; 38(1-8):513-6. PubMed ID: 10829716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of interfacial adhesion on the ultrasonic interaction with adhesive joints: A theoretical study using spring-type interfaces.
    Mori N; Matsuda N; Kusaka T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3541. PubMed ID: 31255134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Apparent anisotropy of adhesive bonds with weak adhesion and non-destructive evaluation of interfacial properties.
    Siryabe E; Rénier M; Meziane A; Galy J; Castaings M
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Aug; 79():34-51. PubMed ID: 28427015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SH ultrasonic guided waves for the evaluation of interfacial adhesion.
    Castaings M
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Sep; 54(7):1760-75. PubMed ID: 24698120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some studies on evaluation of degradation in composite adhesive joints using ultrasonic techniques.
    Vijaya Kumar RL; Bhat MR; Murthy CR
    Ultrasonics; 2013 Aug; 53(6):1150-62. PubMed ID: 23541960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laser ultrasonics in a multilayer structure: Plane wave synthesis and inverse problem for nondestructive evaluation of adhesive bondings.
    Hodé R; Raetz S; Chigarev N; Blondeau J; Cuvillier N; Gusev V; Ducousso M; Tournat V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Sep; 150(3):2076. PubMed ID: 34598603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling the propagation of ultrasonic waves in the interface region between two bonded elements.
    Delsanto PP; Hirsekorn S; Agostini V; Loparco R; Koka A
    Ultrasonics; 2002 May; 40(1-8):605-10. PubMed ID: 12160009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reflection and transmission coefficients of the SH0 mode in the adhesive structures with imperfect interface.
    Ding J; Wu B; He C
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Aug; 70():248-57. PubMed ID: 27236364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on adhesive enhancement of plasma-modified nickel surface.
    Wang H; Zhang Q; Chen Y; Hua L; Liu Z
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2022 Sep; 89():106126. PubMed ID: 36007330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analytical and numerical modeling of non-collinear shear wave mixing at an imperfect interface.
    Zhang Z; Nagy PB; Hassan W
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():165-76. PubMed ID: 26482394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shear Strength and Interfacial Toughness Characterization of Sapphire-Epoxy Interfaces for Nacre-Inspired Composites.
    Behr S; Jungblut L; Swain MV; Schneider GA
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2016 Oct; 8(40):27322-27331. PubMed ID: 27632228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adhesive Joints of Additively Manufactured Adherends: Ultrasonic Evaluation of Adhesion Strength.
    Kowalczyk J; Ulbrich D; Sędłak K; Nowak M
    Materials (Basel); 2022 May; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 35591623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The bonding of an adhesive resin cement to single and combined adherends encountered in resin-bonded bridge work: an in vitro study.
    Aboush YE; Jenkins CB
    Br Dent J; 1991 Sep; 171(6):166-9. PubMed ID: 1832915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of different adherend materials and combinations on in vitro shear bond strength.
    Zhang X; Chai ZG; Wang H; Wang YJ; Chen JH
    Dent Mater J; 2013; 32(4):622-7. PubMed ID: 23903645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design of a new, multi-purpose, light-curing adhesive comprising a silane coupling agent, acidic adhesive monomers and dithiooctanoate monomers for bonding to varied metal and dental ceramic materials.
    Ikemura K; Tanaka H; Fujii T; Deguchi M; Negoro N; Endo T; Kadoma Y
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 21778601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.