169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32440631)
21. Evaluation of the quality and readability of online information about breast cancer in China.
Li Y; Zhou X; Zhou Y; Mao F; Shen S; Lin Y; Zhang X; Chang TH; Sun Q
Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Apr; 104(4):858-864. PubMed ID: 32988687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of search term on the quality and accuracy of online information regarding distal radius fractures.
Dy CJ; Taylor SA; Patel RM; Kitay A; Roberts TR; Daluiski A
J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 37(9):1881-7. PubMed ID: 22857909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Internet search term affects the quality and accuracy of online information about developmental hip dysplasia.
Fabricant PD; Dy CJ; Patel RM; Blanco JS; Doyle SM
J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Jun; 33(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 23653022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet.
Azer SA; AlOlayan TI; AlGhamdi MA; AlSanea MA
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 23(9):1676-1696. PubMed ID: 28321169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Internet Health Resources on Nocturnal Enuresis: A Readability, Quality, and Accuracy Analysis.
Fung ACH; Lee MHL; Leung JL; Chan IHY; Wong KKY
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2024 Feb; 34(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 37595631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Readability and quality of online eating disorder information-Are they sufficient? A systematic review evaluating websites on anorexia nervosa using DISCERN and Flesch Readability.
Arts H; Lemetyinen H; Edge D
Int J Eat Disord; 2020 Jan; 53(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 31589331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Readability and Variability Among Online Resources for Patella Dislocation: What Patients Are Reading.
Echuri H; Wendell CW; Brown S; Mulcahey MK
Orthopedics; 2022; 45(2):e62-e66. PubMed ID: 35021028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.
Kaicker J; Borg Debono V; Dang W; Buckley N; Thabane L
BMC Med; 2010 Oct; 8():59. PubMed ID: 20939875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
Kong KA; Hu A
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.
Vives M; Young L; Sabharwal S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2826-31. PubMed ID: 19910867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Googling fibroids: A critical appraisal of information available on the internet.
Hirsch M; Wojtaszewska A; Saridogan E; Mavrelos D; Barker C; Duffy JMN
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jul; 250():224-230. PubMed ID: 32473505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. All I Have Learned, I Have Learned from Google: Why Today's Facial Rejuvenation Patients are Prone to Misinformation, and the Steps We can take to Contend with Unreliable Information.
Mehta N; Gupta A; Nissan M
Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 35(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 31412380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study.
Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analysis of Readability, Quality, and Content of Online Information Available for "Stem Cell" Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis.
Ng MK; Mont MA; Piuzzi NS
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Mar; 35(3):647-651.e2. PubMed ID: 31678019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality Analysis of Online Resources for Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease.
Treffalls JA; Treffalls RN; Zachary H; Clothier W; Tolbert PH; Yan Q; Davies MG
Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Jul; 83():1-9. PubMed ID: 34995744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality and Reliability of Publicly Accessible Information on Laser Treatments for Urinary Incontinence: What Is Available to Our Patients?
Perruzza D; Jolliffe C; Butti A; McCaffrey C; Kung R; Gagnon L; Lee P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1524-1530. PubMed ID: 31927043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Readability of websites containing information about prostate cancer treatment options.
Ellimoottil C; Polcari A; Kadlec A; Gupta G
J Urol; 2012 Dec; 188(6):2171-5. PubMed ID: 23083852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quality, Readability, and Trends for Websites on Ankyloglossia.
Aaronson NL; Castaño JE; Simons JP; Jabbour N
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 Jul; 127(7):439-444. PubMed ID: 29774762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ankle Fractures: The Current State of Online Patient Information.
Noback PC; Trupia EP; Dziesinski LK; Sarpong NO; Trofa DP; Vosseller JT
Foot Ankle Spec; 2021 Aug; 14(4):324-333. PubMed ID: 32674596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
