These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32440927)

  • 1. Experimental Evidence for Sex Differences in Sexual Variety Preferences: Support for the Coolidge Effect in Humans.
    Hughes SM; Aung T; Harrison MA; LaFayette JN; Gallup GG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):495-509. PubMed ID: 32440927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex differences in short-term mate preferences and behavioral mimicry: a semi-naturalistic experiment.
    van Straaten I; Engels RC; Finkenauer C; Holland RW
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Dec; 37(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 17682936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra-sex Variation in Human Mating Strategies: Different People, Different Tactics.
    Castro FN; Hattori WT; de Araújo Lopes F
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1729-36. PubMed ID: 25896490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why.
    Li NP; Kenrick DT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):468-89. PubMed ID: 16594832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of Partner Novelty in Sexual Functioning: A Review.
    Morton H; Gorzalka BB
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2015; 41(6):593-609. PubMed ID: 25222339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex differences in sexual psychology produce sex-similar preferences for a short-term mate.
    Shackelford TK; Goetz AT; LaMunyon CW; Quintus BJ; Weekes-Shackelford VA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2004 Aug; 33(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 15162086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in preference for risky behaviors during courtship.
    Prokop P; Pazda A
    Scand J Psychol; 2020 Aug; 61(4):560-564. PubMed ID: 32103513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of an explorative empirical study on human mating in Germany: handsome men, not high-status men, succeed in courtship.
    Pashos A; Niemitz C
    Anthropol Anz; 2003 Sep; 61(3):331-41. PubMed ID: 14524006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
    March E; Van Doorn G; Grieve R
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918812138. PubMed ID: 30428700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Multi-Method Study Examining the Role of Swiping on Dating Apps: Mate Value Preferences, Sexual Satisfaction, and Need Satisfaction with Matches in Emerging Adults.
    Vranken I; Sumter S; Vandenbosch L
    Arch Sex Behav; 2024 Jul; 53(7):2547-2582. PubMed ID: 38839703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do young dating app users and non-users differ in mating orientations?
    Barrada JR; Castro Á; Fernández Del Río E; Ramos-Villagrasa PJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246350. PubMed ID: 33529217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are Sex Differences in Preferences for Physical Attractiveness and Good Earning Capacity in Potential Mates Smaller in Countries With Greater Gender Equality?
    Zhang L; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(2):1474704919852921. PubMed ID: 31146580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What do women's advertised mate preferences reveal? An analysis of video dating profiles.
    Goetz CD
    Evol Psychol; 2013 May; 11(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 23718946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Romantic preferences in Brazilian undergraduate students: from the short term to the long term.
    Castro FN; de Araújo Lopes F
    J Sex Res; 2011 Sep; 48(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 20830643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in post-coital behaviors in long- and short-term mating: an evolutionary perspective.
    Hughes SM; Kruger DJ
    J Sex Res; 2011 Sep; 48(5):496-505. PubMed ID: 20799133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Men's Preference for Women Who Like Women: The Effects of Desire for Sexual Variety and Willingness to Have Sex Without Commitment.
    Apostolou M
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(3):1474704919856800. PubMed ID: 31284747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender differences in affective responses to sexual rejection.
    de Graaf H; Sandfort TG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2004 Aug; 33(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 15162085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Religious identification as a moderator of evolved sexual strategies of men and women.
    Njus DM; Bane CM
    J Sex Res; 2009; 46(6):546-57. PubMed ID: 19343580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.