These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32441034)

  • 1. Lexique-Infra: grapheme-phoneme, phoneme-grapheme regularity, consistency, and other sublexical statistics for 137,717 polysyllabic French words.
    Gimenes M; Perret C; New B
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Dec; 52(6):2480-2488. PubMed ID: 32441034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manulex-infra: distributional characteristics of grapheme-phoneme mappings, and infralexical and lexical units in child-directed written material.
    Peereman R; Lété B; Sprenger-Charolles L
    Behav Res Methods; 2007 Aug; 39(3):579-89. PubMed ID: 17958171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The English Sublexical Toolkit: Methods for indexing sound-spelling consistency.
    Wiley RW; Singh S; Baig Y; Key K; Purcell JJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38594441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-assisted training of phoneme-grapheme correspondence for children who are deaf and hard of hearing: effects on phonological processing skills.
    Nakeva von Mentzer C; Lyxell B; Sahlén B; Wass M; Lindgren M; Ors M; Kallioinen P; Uhlén I
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Dec; 77(12):2049-57. PubMed ID: 24210843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative quantitative analysis of Greek orthographic transparency.
    Protopapas A; Vlahou EL
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):991-1008. PubMed ID: 19897808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inferring sublexical correspondences from sight vocabulary: evidence from 6- and 7-year-olds.
    Stuart M; Masterson J; Dixon M; Quinlan P
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):353-66. PubMed ID: 10371874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Teacher candidates' mastery of phoneme-grapheme correspondence: massed versus distributed practice in teacher education.
    Sayeski KL; Earle GA; Eslinger RP; Whitenton JN
    Ann Dyslexia; 2017 Apr; 67(1):26-41. PubMed ID: 26969573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How predictable is spelling? Developing and testing metrics of phoneme-grapheme contingency.
    Perry C; Ziegler JC; Coltheart M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):897-915. PubMed ID: 12188519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors that influence phoneme-grapheme correspondence learning.
    Mauer DM; Kamhi AG
    J Learn Disabil; 1996 May; 29(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 8732887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond the two-strategy model of skilled spelling: effects of consistency, grain size, and orthographic redundancy.
    Perry C; Ziegler JC
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Feb; 57(2):325-56. PubMed ID: 14742179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grapheme-Phoneme Learning in an Unknown Orthography: A Study in Typical Reading and Dyslexic Children.
    Law JM; De Vos A; Vanderauwera J; Wouters J; Ghesquière P; Vandermosten M
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1393. PubMed ID: 30158886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grapheme-phoneme processing of single words.
    Walter N; Cliche S; Joubert S; Beauregard M; Joanette Y
    Brain Cogn; 2001; 46(1-2):295-9. PubMed ID: 11527353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arabic phoneme-grapheme correspondence by non-native, deaf children with cochlear implants and normal hearing children.
    Anis FN; Umat C; Ahmad K; Abdul Hamid B
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Nov; 23(6):347-357. PubMed ID: 36005236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. LEXOP: a lexical database providing orthography-phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words.
    Peereman R; Content A
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 1999 May; 31(2):376-9. PubMed ID: 10495825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthography-phonology consistency in English: Theory- and data-driven measures and their impact on auditory vs. visual word recognition.
    Lim A; O'Brien B; Onnis L
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1283-1313. PubMed ID: 37553536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developmental surface dyslexia and dysgraphia: an orthographic processing impairment.
    Hanley JR; Hastie K; Kay J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 Feb; 44(2):285-319. PubMed ID: 1565802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orthographic transparency and grapheme-phoneme conversion: An ERP study in Arabic and French readers.
    Simon G; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):141-52. PubMed ID: 16822485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developmental surface and phonological dyslexia in both Greek and English.
    Sotiropoulos A; Hanley JR
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():205-216. PubMed ID: 28710937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of grapheme-to-phoneme probability on writing durations.
    Afonso O; Álvarez CJ; Kandel S
    Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):579-92. PubMed ID: 25421318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.