These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32441325)

  • 1. Looking where it's hard to see: a case study documenting rare Eucyclogobius newberryi presence in a California lagoon.
    Dressler TL; Lafferty KD; Jerde CL; Dudley T
    J Fish Biol; 2020 Aug; 97(2):572-576. PubMed ID: 32441325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Looking where it's hard to see: a case study documenting rare Eucyclogobius newberryi presence in a California lagoon.
    J Fish Biol; 2021 Feb; 98(2):426. PubMed ID: 33570205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using occupancy modelling to compare environmental DNA to traditional field methods for regional-scale monitoring of an endangered aquatic species.
    Schmelzle MC; Kinziger AP
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jul; 16(4):895-908. PubMed ID: 26677162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A New Species of the Bay Goby Genus Eucyclogobius, Endemic to Southern California: Evolution, Conservation, and Decline.
    Swift CC; Spies B; Ellingson RA; Jacobs DK
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158543. PubMed ID: 27462700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using vertebrate environmental DNA from seawater in biomonitoring of marine habitats.
    Sigsgaard EE; Torquato F; Frøslev TG; Moore ABM; Sørensen JM; Range P; Ben-Hamadou R; Bach SS; Møller PR; Thomsen PF
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 31729081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating monitoring options for conservation: comparing traditional and environmental DNA tools for a critically endangered mammal.
    Qu C; Stewart KA
    Naturwissenschaften; 2019 Feb; 106(3-4):9. PubMed ID: 30778682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and Validation of Environmental DNA (eDNA) Markers for Detection of Freshwater Turtles.
    Davy CM; Kidd AG; Wilson CC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130965. PubMed ID: 26200348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rampant drift in artificially fragmented populations of the endangered tidewater goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi).
    McCraney WT; Goldsmith G; Jacobs DK; Kinziger AP
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Aug; 19(16):3315-27. PubMed ID: 20666998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of environmental DNA to detect an endangered marine skate species in the wild.
    Weltz K; Lyle JM; Ovenden J; Morgan JAT; Moreno DA; Semmens JM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178124. PubMed ID: 28591215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA.
    Port JA; O'Donnell JL; Romero-Maraccini OC; Leary PR; Litvin SY; Nickols KJ; Yamahara KM; Kelly RP
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(2):527-41. PubMed ID: 26586544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Traditional trapping methods outperform eDNA sampling for introduced semi-aquatic snakes.
    Rose JP; Wademan C; Weir S; Wood JS; Todd BD
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219244. PubMed ID: 31265475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. eDNA as a tool for identifying freshwater species in sustainable forestry: A critical review and potential future applications.
    Coble AA; Flinders CA; Homyack JA; Penaluna BE; Cronn RC; Weitemier K
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 649():1157-1170. PubMed ID: 30308887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combining surface and soil environmental DNA with artificial cover objects to improve terrestrial reptile survey detection.
    Kyle KE; Allen MC; Dragon J; Bunnell JF; Reinert HK; Zappalorti R; Jaffe BD; Angle JC; Lockwood JL
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Dec; 36(6):e13939. PubMed ID: 35603473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
    Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marine environmental DNA: Approaches, applications, and opportunities.
    Eble JA; Daly-Engel TS; DiBattista JD; Koziol A; Gaither MR
    Adv Mar Biol; 2020; 86(1):141-169. PubMed ID: 32600544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomonitoring of marine vertebrates in Monterey Bay using eDNA metabarcoding.
    Andruszkiewicz EA; Starks HA; Chavez FP; Sassoubre LM; Block BA; Boehm AB
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176343. PubMed ID: 28441466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental DNA: An Emerging Tool in Ecological Assessment.
    Wang P; Yan Z; Yang S; Wang S; Zheng X; Fan J; Zhang T
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2019 Nov; 103(5):651-656. PubMed ID: 31583422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods.
    Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive management of large aquatic ecosystem recovery programs in the United States.
    Thom R; St Clair T; Burns R; Anderson M
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 2):424-430. PubMed ID: 27545987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concurrent visual encounter sampling validates eDNA selectivity and sensitivity for the endangered wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta).
    Akre TS; Parker LD; Ruther E; Maldonado JE; Lemmon L; McInerney NR
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215586. PubMed ID: 31017960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.