325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32442132)
21. Theories Informing eHealth Implementation: Systematic Review and Typology Classification.
Heinsch M; Wyllie J; Carlson J; Wells H; Tickner C; Kay-Lambkin F
J Med Internet Res; 2021 May; 23(5):e18500. PubMed ID: 34057427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of the Intention to Use Mobile Health Applications Using a Technology Acceptance Model in an Israeli Adult Population.
Shemesh T; Barnoy S
Telemed J E Health; 2020 Sep; 26(9):1141-1149. PubMed ID: 31930955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Development of a tripolar model of technology acceptance: Hospital-based physicians' perspective on EHR.
Beglaryan M; Petrosyan V; Bunker E
Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jun; 102():50-61. PubMed ID: 28495348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Technology-Based Innovations to Foster Personalized Healthy Lifestyles and Well-Being: A Targeted Review.
Spanakis EG; Santana S; Tsiknakis M; Marias K; Sakkalis V; Teixeira A; Janssen JH; de Jong H; Tziraki C
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jun; 18(6):e128. PubMed ID: 27342137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Perceptions of Patients Regarding Mobile Health Interventions for the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed Methods Study.
Alwashmi MF; Fitzpatrick B; Farrell J; Gamble JM; Davis E; Nguyen HV; Farrell G; Hawboldt J
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e17409. PubMed ID: 32706697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mobile Health Divide Between Clinicians and Patients in Cancer Care: Results From a Cross-Sectional International Survey.
Tarricone R; Cucciniello M; Armeni P; Petracca F; Desouza KC; Hall LK; Keefe D
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Sep; 7(9):e13584. PubMed ID: 31493318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Exploring Factors Affecting Voluntary Adoption of Electronic Medical Records Among Physicians and Clinical Assistants of Small or Solo Private General Practice Clinics.
Or C; Tong E; Tan J; Chan S
J Med Syst; 2018 May; 42(7):121. PubMed ID: 29845400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Perceptions of Health Care Providers Regarding a Mobile Health Intervention to Manage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Study.
Alwashmi MF; Fitzpatrick B; Davis E; Gamble JM; Farrell J; Hawboldt J
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jun; 7(6):e13950. PubMed ID: 31199330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intervention and Evaluation of Mobile Health Technologies in Management of Patients Undergoing Chronic Dialysis: Scoping Review.
Yang Y; Chen H; Qazi H; Morita PP
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Apr; 8(4):e15549. PubMed ID: 32242823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. End User and Implementer Experiences of mHealth Technologies for Noncommunicable Chronic Disease Management in Young Adults: Systematic Review.
Slater H; Campbell JM; Stinson JN; Burley MM; Briggs AM
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Dec; 19(12):e406. PubMed ID: 29233804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Smartphone-Based Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion: Scoping Review of the Evidence Over the Last 10 Years.
Domin A; Spruijt-Metz D; Theisen D; Ouzzahra Y; Vögele C
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jul; 9(7):e24308. PubMed ID: 34287209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A phase III wait-listed randomised controlled trial of novel targeted inter-professional clinical education intervention to improve cancer patients' reported pain outcomes (The Cancer Pain Assessment (CPAS) Trial): study protocol.
Phillips JL; Heneka N; Lovell M; Lam L; Davidson P; Boyle F; McCaffrey N; Fielding S; Shaw T
Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):62. PubMed ID: 30658657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Supporting Self-Management of Cardiovascular Diseases Through Remote Monitoring Technologies: Metaethnography Review of Frameworks, Models, and Theories Used in Research and Development.
Cruz-Martínez RR; Wentzel J; Asbjørnsen RA; Noort PD; van Niekerk JM; Sanderman R; van Gemert-Pijnen JE
J Med Internet Res; 2020 May; 22(5):e16157. PubMed ID: 32436852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Technology acceptance and critical mass: Development of a consolidated model to explain the actual use of mobile health care communication tools.
Byrd TF; Kim JS; Yeh C; Lee J; O'Leary KJ
J Biomed Inform; 2021 May; 117():103749. PubMed ID: 33766780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Technology Acceptance in Mobile Health: Scoping Review of Definitions, Models, and Measurement.
Nadal C; Sas C; Doherty G
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e17256. PubMed ID: 32628122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mobile Apps for Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review of Features and Content Quality.
Nicholas J; Larsen ME; Proudfoot J; Christensen H
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Aug; 17(8):e198. PubMed ID: 26283290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Current and future applications of mobile health technology for evaluating spine surgery patients: a review.
Greenberg JK; Javeed S; Zhang JK; Benedict B; Frumkin MR; Xu Z; Zhang J; Rodebaugh TL; Lu C; Piccirillo JF; Steinmetz M; Ghogawala Z; Bydon M; Ray WZ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 May; 38(5):617-626. PubMed ID: 36670535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Healthcare Workers' Perspectives of mHealth Adoption Factors in the Developing World: Scoping Review.
Addotey-Delove M; Scott RE; Mars M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 36673995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Social Media mHealth Solution to Address the Needs of Dengue Prevention and Management in Sri Lanka.
Lwin MO; Vijaykumar S; Rathnayake VS; Lim G; Panchapakesan C; Foo S; Wijayamuni R; Wimalaratne P; Fernando ON
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jul; 18(7):e149. PubMed ID: 27369296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluating Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake of mHealth Apps in Cancer Care Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: Scoping Literature Review.
Ardito V; Golubev G; Ciani O; Tarricone R
JMIR Cancer; 2023 Mar; 9():e42092. PubMed ID: 36995750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
