165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32442297)
1. 3D-GNOME 2.0: a three-dimensional genome modeling engine for predicting structural variation-driven alterations of chromatin spatial structure in the human genome.
Wlasnowolski M; Sadowski M; Czarnota T; Jodkowska K; Szalaj P; Tang Z; Ruan Y; Plewczynski D
Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Jul; 48(W1):W170-W176. PubMed ID: 32442297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D-GNOME: an integrated web service for structural modeling of the 3D genome.
Szalaj P; Michalski PJ; Wróblewski P; Tang Z; Kadlof M; Mazzocco G; Ruan Y; Plewczynski D
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jul; 44(W1):W288-93. PubMed ID: 27185892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D-GNOME 3.0: a three-dimensional genome modelling engine for analysing changes of promoter-enhancer contacts in the human genome.
Wlasnowolski M; Kadlof M; Sengupta K; Plewczynski D
Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Jul; 51(W1):W5-W10. PubMed ID: 37158257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An integrated 3-Dimensional Genome Modeling Engine for data-driven simulation of spatial genome organization.
Szałaj P; Tang Z; Michalski P; Pietal MJ; Luo OJ; Sadowski M; Li X; Radew K; Ruan Y; Plewczynski D
Genome Res; 2016 Dec; 26(12):1697-1709. PubMed ID: 27789526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of common structural variants on 3D chromatin structure.
Shanta O; Noor A; ; Sebat J
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):95. PubMed ID: 32000688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spring Model - Chromatin Modeling Tool Based on OpenMM.
Kadlof M; Rozycka J; Plewczynski D
Methods; 2020 Oct; 181-182():62-69. PubMed ID: 31790732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial chromatin architecture alteration by structural variations in human genomes at the population scale.
Sadowski M; Kraft A; Szalaj P; Wlasnowolski M; Tang Z; Ruan Y; Plewczynski D
Genome Biol; 2019 Jul; 20(1):148. PubMed ID: 31362752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structural variants drive context-dependent oncogene activation in cancer.
Xu Z; Lee DS; Chandran S; Le VT; Bump R; Yasis J; Dallarda S; Marcotte S; Clock B; Haghani N; Cho CY; Akdemir KC; Tyndale S; Futreal PA; McVicker G; Wahl GM; Dixon JR
Nature; 2022 Dec; 612(7940):564-572. PubMed ID: 36477537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. TADeus2: a web server facilitating the clinical diagnosis by pathogenicity assessment of structural variations disarranging 3D chromatin structure.
Poszewiecka B; Pienkowski VM; Nowosad K; Robin JD; Gogolewski K; Gambin A
Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Jul; 50(W1):W744-W752. PubMed ID: 35524567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. From DNA human sequence to the chromatin higher order organisation and its biological meaning: Using biomolecular interaction networks to understand the influence of structural variation on spatial genome organisation and its functional effect.
Chiliński M; Sengupta K; Plewczynski D
Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2022 Jan; 121():171-185. PubMed ID: 34429265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Somatic structural variant formation is guided by and influences genome architecture.
Sidiropoulos N; Mardin BR; Rodríguez-González FG; Bochkov ID; Garg S; Stütz AM; Korbel JO; Aiden EL; Weischenfeldt J
Genome Res; 2022 Apr; 32(4):643-655. PubMed ID: 35177558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chromosome conformation capture technologies as tools to detect structural variations and their repercussion in chromatin 3D configuration.
Stephenson-Gussinye A; Furlan-Magaril M
Front Cell Dev Biol; 2023; 11():1219968. PubMed ID: 37457299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic Interplay between Structural Variations and 3D Genome Organization in Pancreatic Cancer.
Du Y; Gu Z; Li Z; Yuan Z; Zhao Y; Zheng X; Bo X; Chen H; Wang C
Adv Sci (Weinh); 2022 Jun; 9(18):e2200818. PubMed ID: 35570408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Geographic distribution and adaptive significance of genomic structural variants: an anthropological genetics perspective.
Eaaswarkhanth M; Pavlidis P; Gokcumen O
Hum Biol; 2014; 86(4):260-75. PubMed ID: 25959693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. svclassify: a method to establish benchmark structural variant calls.
Parikh H; Mohiyuddin M; Lam HY; Iyer H; Chen D; Pratt M; Bartha G; Spies N; Losert W; Zook JM; Salit M
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():64. PubMed ID: 26772178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting pathogenic non-coding SVs disrupting the 3D genome in 1646 whole cancer genomes using multiple instance learning.
Nieboer MM; Nguyen L; de Ridder J
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14411. PubMed ID: 34257393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrative detection and analysis of structural variation in cancer genomes.
Dixon JR; Xu J; Dileep V; Zhan Y; Song F; Le VT; Yardımcı GG; Chakraborty A; Bann DV; Wang Y; Clark R; Zhang L; Yang H; Liu T; Iyyanki S; An L; Pool C; Sasaki T; Rivera-Mulia JC; Ozadam H; Lajoie BR; Kaul R; Buckley M; Lee K; Diegel M; Pezic D; Ernst C; Hadjur S; Odom DT; Stamatoyannopoulos JA; Broach JR; Hardison RC; Ay F; Noble WS; Dekker J; Gilbert DM; Yue F
Nat Genet; 2018 Oct; 50(10):1388-1398. PubMed ID: 30202056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. GenomeFlow: a comprehensive graphical tool for modeling and analyzing 3D genome structure.
Trieu T; Oluwadare O; Wopata J; Cheng J
Bioinformatics; 2019 Apr; 35(8):1416-1418. PubMed ID: 30215673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interpreting the impact of noncoding structural variation in neurodevelopmental disorders.
D'haene E; Vergult S
Genet Med; 2021 Jan; 23(1):34-46. PubMed ID: 32973355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional chromatin ensemble reconstruction via stochastic embedding.
Guarnera E; Tan ZW; Berezovsky IN
Structure; 2021 Jun; 29(6):622-634.e3. PubMed ID: 33567266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
