These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32442332)

  • 1. Remote robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: An animal feasibility study.
    Eleid MF; Zheng PP; Gulati R; Bergman P; Kottenstette N; Li Y; Lerman A; Sandhu GS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Feb; 97(3):E274-E279. PubMed ID: 32442332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.
    Weisz G; Metzger DC; Caputo RP; Delgado JA; Marshall JJ; Vetrovec GW; Reisman M; Waksman R; Granada JF; Novack V; Moses JW; Carrozza JP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 61(15):1596-600. PubMed ID: 23500318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Mahmud E; Naghi J; Ang L; Harrison J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 10(13):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 28683937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Network latency and long-distance robotic telestenting: Exploring the potential impact of network delays on telestenting performance.
    Madder RD; VanOosterhout S; Mulder A; Bush J; Martin S; Rash AJ; Tan JM; Parker JL; Kalafut A; Li Y; Kottenstette N; Bergman P; Nowak B
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Apr; 95(5):914-919. PubMed ID: 31410958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of network performance on remote robotic-assisted endovascular interventions in porcine model.
    Legeza P; Britz GW; Shah A; Sconzert K; Sungur JM; Chinnadurai P; Sinha K; Lumsden AB
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Feb; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 33550514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the R-One robotic system for percutaneous coronary intervention: the R-EVOLUTION study.
    Durand E; Sabatier R; Smits PC; Verheye S; Pereira B; Fajadet J
    EuroIntervention; 2023 Apr; 18(16):e1339-e1347. PubMed ID: 36602883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion.
    Harrison J; Ang L; Naghi J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Patel MP; Reeves RR; Mahmud E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jul; 19(5 Pt A):526-531. PubMed ID: 29221959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Traditional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Cohort.
    Patel TM; Shah SC; Soni YY; Radadiya RC; Patel GA; Tiwari PO; Pancholy SB
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(5):e008888. PubMed ID: 32406263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Into a High-Risk PCI Program.
    Chitturi KR; Kanake S; Nguyen T; Loc B; Baden K; Bavishi C; Kumar A; Liu Z; Chan A; Karuparthi PR; Hirai T
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Oct; 43():115-119. PubMed ID: 35610138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system.
    Granada JF; Delgado JA; Uribe MP; Fernandez A; Blanco G; Leon MB; Weisz G
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Apr; 4(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 21511227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic-Assisted PCI: The Future of Coronary Intervention?
    Stevenson A; Kirresh A; Ahmad M; Candilio L
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Feb; 35():161-168. PubMed ID: 33867293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic telestenting performance in transcontinental and regional pre-clinical models.
    Madder RD; VanOosterhout S; Parker J; Sconzert K; Li Y; Kottenstette N; Madsen A; Sungur JM; Bergman P
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Feb; 97(3):E327-E332. PubMed ID: 32583944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety and feasibility of performing staged non-culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention within the index hospitalization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.
    Loh JP; Kitabata H; Torguson R; Satler LF; Kent KM; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Lindsay J; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(5):258-63. PubMed ID: 24034862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Planned Robotic Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Feasibility Report.
    Walters D; Patel M; Reeves R; Ang L; Al Khiami B; Mahmud E
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 32(6):201-205. PubMed ID: 32330119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report.
    Smitson CC; Ang L; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M; Mahmud E
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 30(4):152-156. PubMed ID: 29335386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety and feasibility of robotic assisted percutaneous coronary intervention compared to standard percutaneous coronary intervention- a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tripathi B; Sharma P; Arora S; Murtaza M; Singh A; Solanki D; Kapadia S; Sharma A; Pershad A
    Indian Heart J; 2021; 73(5):549-554. PubMed ID: 34627567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complex robotic compared to manual coronary interventions: 6- and 12-month outcomes.
    Walters D; Reeves RR; Patel M; Naghi J; Ang L; Mahmud E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Mar; 93(4):613-617. PubMed ID: 30456889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experience and Outcomes of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction of Tertiary Care Center in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
    Jahic E
    Med Arch; 2017 Jun; 71(3):183-187. PubMed ID: 28974830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and technical outcomes of robotic versus manual percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jaffar-Karballai M; Haque A; Voller C; Elleithy A; Harky A
    J Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 80(6):495-504. PubMed ID: 35165012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Mangels DR; Giri J; Hirshfeld J; Wilensky RL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(6):948-955. PubMed ID: 28722293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.