These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32442669)

  • 21. Effects of work zone configurations and traffic density on performance variables and subjective workload.
    Shakouri M; Ikuma LH; Aghazadeh F; Punniaraj K; Ishak S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Oct; 71():166-76. PubMed ID: 24926939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Crashes and near-crashes on horizontal curves along rural two-lane highways: Analysis of naturalistic driving data.
    Wang B; Hallmark S; Savolainen P; Dong J
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():163-169. PubMed ID: 29203015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 May; 78():212-221. PubMed ID: 25794922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Road safety from the perspective of driver gender and age as related to the injury crash frequency and road scenario.
    Russo F; Biancardo SA; Dell'Acqua G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24279963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of chevron alignment signs on driver performance on horizontal curves with different roadway geometries.
    Zhao X; Wu Y; Rong J; Ma J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Feb; 75():226-35. PubMed ID: 25525973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How do drivers behave during indecision zone maneuvers?
    Xiong H; Narayanaswamy P; Bao S; Flannagan C; Sayer J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():274-279. PubMed ID: 26210884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Investigation into passing behavior at passing zones to validate and extend the use of driving simulators in two-lane roads safety analysis.
    Karimi A; Bassani M; Boroujerdian AM; Catani L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 May; 139():105487. PubMed ID: 32135336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lane change behavior with a side blind zone alert system.
    Kiefer RJ; Hankey JM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):683-90. PubMed ID: 18329421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The evaluation of eye-catching effect in freeway tunnel entrance zone based on fixation behavior characteristics.
    Han L; Du Z; He S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(2):122-132. PubMed ID: 38019558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prevalence of driver physical factors leading to unintentional lane departure crashes.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul; 18(5):481-487. PubMed ID: 27740863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Driver responses to differing urban work zone configurations.
    Morgan JF; Duley AR; Hancock PA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):978-85. PubMed ID: 20380928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Driver perception of roadside configurations on two-lane rural roads: Effects on speed and lateral placement.
    Bella F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():251-62. PubMed ID: 22595299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A driving simulator study of driver performance on deceleration lanes.
    Calvi A; Benedetto A; De Blasiis MR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():195-203. PubMed ID: 22269501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Creating pedestrian crash scenarios in a driving simulator environment.
    Chrysler ST; Ahmad O; Schwarz CW
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S12-7. PubMed ID: 26027964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of cooperative systems on driver behavior in heavy fog condition based on a driving simulator.
    Chang X; Li H; Qin L; Rong J; Lu Y; Chen X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():197-205. PubMed ID: 31054492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modelling how drivers respond to a bicyclist crossing their path at an intersection: How do test track and driving simulator compare?
    Boda CN; Dozza M; Bohman K; Thalya P; Larsson A; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():238-250. PubMed ID: 29248617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of bus drivers reaction to simulated traffic collision situations - eye-tracking studies.
    Bortkiewicz A; Gadzicka E; Siedlecka J; Kosobudzki M; Dania M; Szymczak W; Jóźwiak Z; Szyjkowska A; Viebig P; Pas-Wyroślak A; Makowiec-Dąbrowska T; Kapitaniak B; Hickman JS
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2019 Apr; 32(2):161-174. PubMed ID: 30575822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of cyclists present at rural intersections on speed behavior and workload of car drivers: a driving simulator study.
    Duivenvoorden K; Hogema J; Hagenzieker M; Wegman F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():254-9. PubMed ID: 25000155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Driving with Glaucoma: Task Performance and Gaze Movements.
    Kübler TC; Kasneci E; Rosenstiel W; Heister M; Aehling K; Nagel K; Schiefer U; Papageorgiou E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 92(11):1037-46. PubMed ID: 26501733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.